Life cycle environmental consequences of grass-fed and dairy beef production systems in the Northeastern United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 1619-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole E. Tichenor ◽  
Christian J. Peters ◽  
Gregory A. Norris ◽  
Greg Thoma ◽  
Timothy S. Griffin
1970 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. H. Lindquist ◽  
M. J. Thomson

AbstractMessa nana Klug, a European birch leaf miner which was previously reported in northeastern United States, was recently discovered in southeastern Ontario. Its life cycle and some immature stages are described.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 756-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thu Lan T. Nguyen ◽  
John E. Hermansen ◽  
Lisbeth Mogensen

animal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 100247
Author(s):  
J. Herron ◽  
T.P. Curran ◽  
A.P. Moloney ◽  
M. McGee ◽  
E.G. O'Riordan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Pedro Henrique Presumido ◽  
Fernando Sousa ◽  
Artur Gonçalves ◽  
Tatiane Cristina Dal Bosco ◽  
Manuel Feliciano

The sustainability of meat production systems has been highlighted by the impact on the environment and the conservation of natural resources. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a specific review of the environmental sustainability of beef production in a life cycle assessment (LCA) context. Questions about the main environmental impacts caused by beef production were discussed. The phases of the LCA were detailed as well as the main functional units, boundaries of the systems and categories of impacts used in recent studies. LCA is a fast, easy and intuitive method that correlates human activities and their environmental performance in different sectors, such as beef production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akifumi Ogino ◽  
Kritapon Sommart ◽  
Sayan Subepang ◽  
Makoto Mitsumori ◽  
Keisuke Hayashi ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2916
Author(s):  
Marty Matlock ◽  
Martin Christie ◽  
Greg Thoma

Agricultural production systems have been identified as significant sources of anthropogenic impacts across several environmental key performance indicators (KPIs). Livestock husbandry is growing in global importance as the demand for high-quality protein continues to increase. It is therefore imperative to have sustainable intensification technologies, and we describe one such technology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Enogen® corn grain compared to conventional feed corn when used as an ingredient in backgrounding and feed yard beef rations using life cycle assessment. The project was conducted in compliance with ISO standards, including a third-party panel review. A series of scenarios were analyzed to evaluate the impacts of boundaries and functional units on the outcomes. The use of Enogen corn as a feed component in beef production showed a quantifiable benefit in terms of the sustainability metrics of primary interest in this study. The gate-to-gate improvements at the feed yard and backgrounding based on full field trial datasets from field trials conducted at Kansas State University and at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln showed 3.4 and 5.8 percent reductions in Global Warming Potential, respectively. It is particularly noteworthy that the improvement in feed conversion ratio at the feed yard results in approximately 6 percent improvement in the four key environmental performance metrics of beef production, which demonstrates potential for the sector to meet its sustainability targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document