Bi-level optimization model for regional energy system planning under demand response scenarios

2021 ◽  
pp. 129009
Author(s):  
Yan Ding ◽  
Xiaoting Wei
Energy Policy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 111578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Wang ◽  
Petra W. Heijnen ◽  
Pieter J. Imhof

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2457
Author(s):  
Wenshi Wang ◽  
Houqi Dong ◽  
Yangfan Luo ◽  
Changhao Zhang ◽  
Bo Zeng ◽  
...  

In this paper, a novel methodological framework for energy hub (EH) planning, considering the correlation between renewable energy source (RES) and demand response (DR) uncertainties, is proposed. Unlike other existing works, our study explicitly considers the potential correlation between the uncertainty of integrated energy system operations (i.e., wind speed, light intensity, and demand response). Firstly, an EH single-objective interval optimization model is established, which aims at minimizing investment and operation costs. The model fully considers the correlation between various uncertain parameters. Secondly, the correlation between uncertainties is dealt with by the interval models of multidimensional parallelism and affine coordinate transformation, which are transformed into a deterministic optimization problem by the interval order relationship and probability algorithm, and then solved by a genetic algorithm. Finally, an experimental case is analyzed, and the results show that the research method in this paper has good engineering practicability. At the same time, different correlations among uncertainties have different influences on integrated energy system planning. Correlation and influence are positively correlated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 256 ◽  
pp. 02007
Author(s):  
Zheng Wang ◽  
Xuxia Li ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
Yan Liang ◽  
Yingying Hu ◽  
...  

At present, most comprehensive energy planning methods aim at economy. A distributed integrated energy system planning method considering reliability and integrated demand response is proposed. This method considers that IDR can effectively realize the peak valley cutting of load characteristics, improve the system economy, and increase the reliability constraint penalty cost to make it more realistic. The example results show that the proposed method can consider the economy and reliability of configuration results under different conditions, and realize the selection of equipment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 11341
Author(s):  
Jixian Cui ◽  
Chenghao Liao ◽  
Ling Ji ◽  
Yulei Xie ◽  
Yangping Yu ◽  
...  

This paper is aimed at proposing a short-term hybrid energy system robust optimization model for regional energy system planning and air pollution mitigation based on the inexact multi-stage stochastic integer programming and conditional value-at-risk method through a case study in Shandong Province, China. Six power conversion technologies (i.e., coal-fired power, hydropower, photovoltaic power, wind power, biomass power, and nuclear power) and power demand sectors (agriculture, industry, building industry, transportation, business, and residential department) were considered in the proposed model. The optimized electricity generation, capacity expansion schemes, and economic risks were selected to analyze nine defined scenarios. Results revealed that electricity generations of clean and new power had obvious increasing risks and were key considerations of establishing additional capacities to meet the rising social demands. Moreover, the levels of pollutants mitigation and risk-aversion had a significant influence on different power generation schemes and on the total system cost. In addition, the optimization method developed in this paper could effectively address uncertainties expressed as probability distributions and interval values, and could avoid the system risk in energy system planning problems. The proposed optimization model could be valuable for supporting the adjustment or justification of air pollution mitigation management and electric power planning schemes in Shandong, as well as in other regions of China.


2010 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 536-537
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Oke ◽  
Shin Higashiyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Murata ◽  
Hirofumi Takikawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document