Organizational capital, corporate tax avoidance, and firm value

2021 ◽  
pp. 102050
Author(s):  
Mostafa Monzur Hasan ◽  
Gerald J. Lobo ◽  
Buhui Qiu
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Yorke ◽  
Mohammed Amidu ◽  
Cletus Agyemin Boateng

Scientax ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-247
Author(s):  
John Erhan Prasetyo Hermawan ◽  
Riko Riandoko

This study examines the effect of increases in financial constraints measured at both firm-specific and macroeconomic level on corporate tax avoidance behaviour. Based on a hand-collected sample of 60 publicly listed firms on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the year 2009 to 2016, our regression result shows that firms facing increased firm-specific constraints exhibit lower cash effective tax rates ranging from 0.55 to 9.57 percent which equate to between 0.60 and 10.29 percent of operating cash flows, whereas at macroeconomic constraints do not. The firm-specific constraints result is consistent with our hypothesis and Edwards, et al. (2016), whereas macroeconomic constraints result is inconsistent. Nevertheless, its inconsistency can be caused by several factors, i.e.: (1) the change of corporate tax rate from 28 to 25 percent as fiscal policy after the impact of Global Financial Crisis 2008. It could reduce tax avoidance behaviour; (2) Indonesian Go Public Information Centre stated that the purpose of the firms’ Initial Public Offering (IPO) is not only to finance the firms’ operation due to increases in financial constraints, but also to increase firm value, improve corporate image, grow employee loyalty, maintain business continuity and get tax incentives; (3) the equity financing in Indonesia is more related to equity participation activities conducted among shareholders that’s not listed on the stock or bond markets, e.g. private placement, joint venture, mergers and acquisitions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xudong Chen ◽  
Na Hu ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
Xiaofei Tang

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine whether corporate tax avoidance behavior increases firm value in Chinese context. A large number of studies conduct their designs on the consumption that tax avoidance represents wealth transfer from government to enterprises and therefore enhances firm value. This study argues that, contrast to developed countries, tax avoidance does not necessarily add value to opaque Chinese firms relative to transparent counterparts due to higher agency costs. Design/methodology/approach – Using a large sample of Chinese listed-firms data for the period 2001-2009 and fixed effects regression model, this study examines the relation between tax avoidance and firm value. A series of robustness checks are conducted to alleviate the concern of endogeneity. Findings – The authors find that tax avoidance behavior increases agency costs and reduces firm value. The authors further find that information transparency interacts with corporate tax avoidance, moderating the relation between tax avoidance and firm value. Investors in China react negatively to corporate tax avoidance behavior, but this negative reaction could be mitigated by information transparency. The results are robust to a series of alternative treatments, including varied measures, first-order differential approach and 2SLS. Originality/value – The results suggest that tax avoidance does not necessarily increase firm value, part of gains are encroached by self-serving managers. Moreover, investors in China downplay the significance of tax avoidance, although corporate information transparency could soften their negative tone.


2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihir A Desai ◽  
Dhammika Dharmapala

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (30) ◽  
pp. 114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Luis Leite Santana ◽  
Amaury José Rezende

Este trabalho investiga a relação entre a elisão fiscal empresarial e o valor da firma no Brasil. Embora se possa esperar que as práticas de elisão fiscal resultem em geração de valor para o acionista, teorias alternativas sugerem que isto nem sempre ocorre; custos de agência implícitos, detectados recentemente pela literatura, podem exceder os benefícios da economia tributária, causando destruição de valor. Para verificar o que ocorre, foi conduzida uma análise de dados em painel incluindo 323 companhias negociadas em bolsa nos anos de 2006 a 2012, totalizando 1.704 observações do tipo firma-ano. Foram adotados a BTD, controlada por accruals, como proxy para a elisão fiscal e o q de Tobin como proxy para valor da firma. Os resultados mostram que a elisão fiscal e o valor da firma estão negativamente associados. Avaliou-se também o efeito da governança corporativa, encontrando-se evidências limitadas de que ela pode mitigar a destruição de valor.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhammika Dharmapala ◽  
Mihir A. Desai

Author(s):  
Mihir A. Desai ◽  
Dhammika Dharmapala

Author(s):  
Md. Nazrul Islam ◽  
Fathyah Hashim

The aim of the present paper is to look at whether corporate tax avoidance (CTA) contributes to firm value in the perspective of Bangladeshi listed firms. Our conceptual assumption is that in presence of agency conflicts, corporate managers take on tax avoidance (TA) initiatives to extract their own benefits through taking advantage as of the loopholes of current tax laws. Further, CTA does not fulfill the ethical and social demands. Agency costs and social irresponsibility that produce from TA activities could adversely influence the firm value. It is also among the first paper focusing on the TA and firm value association in the perspective of Bangladeshi listed firms after the gradual decline of stock market index during the year 2019, whereas most of the adjacent South Asian countries’ bourse has achieved gradual improve. However, the present paper aims to integrate relevant studies and theories to extend the intended potentials for limiting corporate tax avoidance to enhance the value of the listed companies in Bangladesh. This study has evaluated CTA behavior from a combination of agency theory and stakeholder theory standpoint rather than traditional sight of tax burden decreasing strategy. Moreover, as existing literature reveals inconsistent and less evidence that attempt to examine the consequence of CTA on firm value, the present paper proposes and shows an imperative proposition for potential empirical research.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Herron ◽  
Rajarishi Nahata

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050008
Author(s):  
Richard Herron ◽  
Rajarishi Nahata

We analyze the valuation-tax avoidance relation and find there is, in fact, a market value discount for tax avoidance. We identify several channels for the adverse valuation effects of tax avoidance. Tax-avoiding firms that (i) lack foreign income, (ii) are financially constrained, and (iii) incur relatively high capital expenditures have lower valuations. A portfolio long the highest and short the lowest tax-avoiding firms has a significantly positive four-factor alpha, highlighting greater risk and thus lower valuation associated with tax avoidance. Our results are robust to a variety of tests, including several different tax avoidance measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document