Expression of activation induced deaminase (AID) and BRAF V600E mutation in malignant melanoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. e80-e81
Author(s):  
Daisuke Omoto ◽  
Emi Mashima ◽  
Yumiko Sakuragi ◽  
Natsuko Saito ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Obadofin ◽  
K. Badmos ◽  
N. Orsi ◽  
M. Bipin ◽  
O. Rotimi ◽  
...  

Background. In Blacks, malignant melanoma (MM) is associated with greater morbidity and mortality compared to Caucasians. MMs with BRAF V600E mutation as well as those with loss of p16 protein expression are associated with aggressive behavior and worse prognosis. Objectives. We determined BRAF (V600E) mutation status and loss of p16 expression in MM cases in Lagos, Nigeria, and correlated these with histopathologic parameters and patients’ age. Methods. Forty-five cases of MM received between January 2005 and December 2014 in the Anatomic and Molecular Pathology Department of Lagos University Teaching Hospital were subjected to immunohistochemical studies to determine BRAF V600E mutation and p16 protein expression. These included cutaneous (n=37), musosal (n=3), and ocular MM (n=2) as well as lymph node metastatases (n=3). Results. BRAF (V600E) mutations were detected in 5/45 (11%) while 31/45 (69%) of the cases had loss of p16 expression. No statistically significant association was found between the BRAF (V600E) mutation, loss of p16 expression, and histologic parameters such as histologic variant, Clark level, Breslow thickness, and ulceration. Conclusion. BRAF (V600E) mutation was detected only in a small proportion of cases while loss of p16 expression occurred in most cases which also had high Clark level, high Breslow thickness, and ulceration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 9511
Author(s):  
Elena Porumb-Andrese ◽  
Ramona Gabriela Ursu ◽  
Iuliu Ivanov ◽  
Irina-Draga Caruntu ◽  
Vlad Porumb ◽  
...  

Background: The prevalence of melanoma in Romanian patients is underestimated. There is a need to identify the BRAF V600E mutation to accurately treat patients with the newest approved BRAF inhibitor therapy. This is a pilot study in which we first aimed to choose the optimal DNA purification method from formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) malignant melanoma skin samples to assess the BRAF mutation prevalence and correlate it with clinical pathological parameters. Methods: 30 FFPE samples were purified in parallel with two DNA extraction kits, a manual and a semi-automated kit. The extracted DNA in pure and optimum quantity was tested for the BRAF V600E mutation using the quantitative allele-specific amplification (quasa) method. quasa is a method for the sensitive detection of mutations that may be present in clinical samples at low levels. Results: The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 60% (18/30) samples in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the skin. BRAFV600E mutation was equally distributed by gender and was associated with age >60, nodular melanoma, and trunk localization. Conclusions: The high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in our study group raises awareness for improvements to the national reporting system and initiation of the target therapy for patients with malignant melanoma of the skin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuji Seo ◽  
Emi Noguchi ◽  
Masayuki Yoshida ◽  
Taisuke Mori ◽  
Maki Tanioka ◽  
...  

Background. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are rare and carry poor prognoses. They are also more aggressive than other breast cancers and are known for their resistance to chemotherapy. Prolonged treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib is a therapy for malignant melanoma that improves the progression-free survival and overall survival. Such molecular-targeted therapies are also being developed for cancers with BRAF mutation, a driver of malignant melanoma. Case Presentation. A 57-year-old woman with metaplastic breast cancer and chemotherapy-refractory massive pleural effusion. After contained anthracycline regimen failure, her breast cancer progressed to an advanced stage. We ordered next-generation sequencing- (NGS-) based tumor molecular profiling from core needle biopsy of the breast. The NGS report indicated the presence of a BRAF V600E mutation. After initiation of dabrafenib and trametinib, her symptom and the pleural effusion were decreased. The first assessment of CT scans showed a decreased pleural effusion and shrunken subcutaneous lesions. Approximately 2 weeks later, a new lesion appeared. She died from 12 weeks after initiation of dabrafenib and trametinib treatment. Conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of BRAF mutation breast cancer treated with dabrafenib and trametinib and it heralds the possibility of targeted therapy for rare breast cancers.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5311-5311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Andritsos ◽  
James S. Blachly ◽  
Kari Kendra ◽  
Gerard Lozanski ◽  
Michael R. Grever

Abstract The activating BRAF mutation V600E has been identified in many human cancers, including colon and lung adenocarcinoma, papillary thyroid cancer, malignant melanoma, and hairy cell leukemia. Here we report for the first time treatment of hairy cell leukemia and malignant melanoma both harboring the BRAF V600E mutation with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. The patient is a 67-year-old man with a history of classic hairy cell leukemia (immunophenotype CD11c, CD19, CD20 (bright), CD25, and CD103). At the time of diagnosis he had pancytopenia and received therapy with cladribine 0.12 mg/kg/day as a 2 hour infusion daily for 5 days, achieving a complete hematologic remission (CHR). His disease recurred 2 years later and he was again treated with cladribine 0.9 mg/kg/day as a 7 day continuous infusion, achieving a CHR. He remained in remission for 5 years, and this time received salvage therapy with pentostatin 4 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 12 doses. He achieved a CHR with minimal residual disease on bone marrow biopsy (0.3% of lymphocytes). He also had dyserythropoiesis concerning for myelodysplastic syndrome in addition to neurologic toxicity with gait imbalance. He was managed expectantly for the next 2 years, during which time he developed an 8 mm red nodule on the extensor surface of his right forearm, and a shave biopsy showed nodular melanoma, Clark’s level IV. He underwent a wide local excision with a negative axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by adjuvant sargramostim (GM-CSF) for 12 months. His melanoma then recurred at the site of the prior excision. A PET scan showed an additional lesion in the midportion of the right arm. The excised solitary recurrence was sent for BRAF V600E mutation testing, which was positive. He received a course of radiotherapy (30 Gy over 14 days) to the affected limb, after which he had no evidence of disease. During this time, he was found to have worsening thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly, as well as a rising IL2 receptor level (peak 3952 U/mL; normal < 970), while bone marrow biopsy showed a 20% cellular marrow with 40% involvement by classic HCL. BRAF testing of the bone marrow by Sanger sequencing was positive for the V600E mutation. Because both his HCL and melanoma harbored the BRAF V600E mutation, the patient was eligible for and enrolled on a phase I clinical trial of dabrafenib for BRAF V600E mutant malignancies. Dabrafenib was initiated orally at a dose of 150 mg twice daily. Each cycle was 28 days. After 3 cycles, the bone marrow cellularity had improved to 30% with a decrease in the leukemic content to 10-15% of marrow cellularity. After 6 cycles, the bone marrow cellularity was normal for age with no residual HCL detectable by immunohistochemical stains or flow cytometric immunophenotyping. PET/CT scan at this time demonstrated no FDG avid lesions and no splenomegaly. Toxicites have consisted of characteristic RAF-associated skin changes and one instance of squamous cell carcinoma, which was excised. He has otherwise had no side effects from therapy. The patient has now completed 12 cycles of therapy with dabrafenib without evidence of either HCL or melanoma. He will remain on therapy as long as he is deriving clinical benefit per protocol. Given the increased risk of second primary malignancies in HCL, BRAF mutation testing should be considered for patients developing solid tumors in which this has been described, as co-treatment may be possible. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Dabrafenib for treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Kendra:Glaxo Smith-Kline: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermin Aminah Usman ◽  
Bethy S Hernowo ◽  
Maringan Diapari Lumbantobing ◽  
Reti Hindritiani

Background and Objective: Detection of BRAF V¬600E gene mutation in Malignant Melanoma (MM) is essential in offering anti BRAF targeted therapy for MM patients. Expression of BRAF V600E mutant protein detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) is affordable, rapid, and reliable. This study aimed to measure the sensitivity and specificity of IHC compared to BRAFV 600E immunoexpression by molecular detection.Method: This study used a paraffin block of acral MM patients to analyze BRAF V600E mutation status using anti-BRAF V600E IHC compared to Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT PCR) which is a gold standard.Result: In total, ninety-six samples were tested using IHC and RT-PCR. RT-PCR showed that 15 (15.6%) samples were positive for BRAF V600E mutation. The sensitivity and specificity for IHC were 73.3% and 87.6% respectively. Concordance value of IHC was 85.4%. There were 10 false positives and 4 false negatives. IHC staining may be applied as early detection of BRAFV600E mutation in MM patients that are going to receive anti BRAF targeted therapy.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (52) ◽  
pp. 85929-85936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Kawaguchi ◽  
Kentaro Igarashi ◽  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Tasuku Kiyuna ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Dr. Susanne Krome

BRAF-mutierte nicht kleinzellige Bronchialkarzinome (NSCLC) sind besonders aggressiv. Gezielte Antikörpertherapien verbesserten die Behandlungsergebnisse. Bei einem ALK-Rearrangement ging eine lange progressionsfreie Zeit nicht zu Lasten der Post-Progressionsphase. Die Sekundäranalyse einer nicht randomisierten Phase-II-Studie zeigt dies nun auch für Patienten mit einer BRAF-V600E-Mutation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document