scholarly journals Marketing messages for post-pandemic destination recovery- A Delphi study

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 100676
Author(s):  
Shweta Singh ◽  
Annmarie Nicely ◽  
Jonathon Day ◽  
Liping A. Cai
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gilger ◽  
Georgette Chammas ◽  
Samuel Maceri ◽  
Nancy K. West ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-180
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Ju Choi ◽  
Il-Soo Park ◽  
Yang-Hwan Sol ◽  
Moon-Sun Ha

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1669-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Eibensteiner ◽  
◽  
Valentin Ritschl ◽  
Gema Ariceta ◽  
Augustina Jankauskiene ◽  
...  

Mindfulness ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Williams ◽  
Samantha Hartley ◽  
Peter Taylor

Abstract Objectives Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a well-evidenced relapse-prevention intervention for depression with a growing evidence-base for use in other clinical populations. The UK initiatives have outlined plans for increasing access to MBCT in clinical settings, although evidence suggests that access remains limited. Given the increased popularity and access to MBCT, there may be deviations from the evidence-base and potential risks of harm. We aimed to understand what clinicians believe should be best clinical practice regarding access to, delivery of, and adaptations to MBCT. Methods We employed a two-stage Delphi methodology. First, to develop statements around best practices, we consulted five mindfulness-based experts and reviewed the literature. Second, a total of 59 statements were taken forward into three survey rating rounds. Results Twenty-nine clinicians completed round one, with 25 subsequently completing both rounds two and three. Forty-four statements reached consensus; 15 statements did not. Clinicians agreed with statements regarding sufficient preparation for accessing MBCT, adherence to the evidence-base and good practice guidelines, consideration of risks, sufficient access to training, support, and resources within services, and carefully considered adaptations. The consensus was not reached on statements which reflected a lack of evidence-base for specific clinical populations or the complex decision-making processes involved in delivering and making adaptations to MBCT. Conclusions Our findings highlight the delicate balance of maintaining a client-centred and transparent approach whilst adhering to the evidence-base in clinical decisions around access to, delivery of, and adaptations in MBCT and have important wide-reaching implications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Dong Nguyen ◽  
Stephen D. Anesi ◽  
Saradha Chexal ◽  
David S. Chu ◽  
Pouya N. Dayani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document