Limited Evidence Suggests That Alveolar Ridge Preservation is More Favorable Than Unassisted Socket Healing in Minimizing Alveolar Ridge Dimensional Changes After Extraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-87
Author(s):  
Victor Tu ◽  
Satish Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Socket Healing

scholarly journals Radiographic and Histologic Analysis 1–2 Years after Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Maxillary Premolar and Molar: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6591
Author(s):  
Sung-Wook Yoon ◽  
Young Woo Song ◽  
Ui-Won Jung ◽  
Jae-Kook Cha
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Histologic Analysis ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Bone Height

After tooth extraction, notable ridge alterations occur due to resorption of bundle bones during the healing process. In areas with thin or damaged socket walls and multiple adjacent tooth extraction, dimensional changes are more prominent in the marginal proportion. In addition to the marginal changes, upper molar teeth are also vulnerable to pneumatization of the maxillary sinus. To reduce dimensional changes in extraction sockets, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is favored by many clinicians in areas where a large amount of dimensional change is expected. This case report presents two cases of ARP using collagenated demineralized bovine bone mineral and demineralized porcine bone mineral in the apically involved upper premolar and molar, respectively. Implants were placed one and two years, respectively, after the ARP. Radiographic analyses of residual bone height and volume were measured using cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT) and histologic analysis of newly formed mineralized bone and residual graft material percentages were measured from the collected tissue samples using a trephine bur. Implants were placed using a simple technique, without any additional bone grafts at the marginal proportion. The ARP technique could maintain the alveolar bone height and volume, as well as minimize the invasiveness of surgical procedures during implant surgery.

scholarly journals Tissue Dimensional Changes Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Different Xenografts Associated with a Collagen Membrane. Results at the 4-Month Re-Entry Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo Guarnieri ◽  
Ippoliti Stefano ◽  
Luigi Stefanelli ◽  
Francesca De Angelis ◽  
Stefano Di Carlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation

scholarly journals Comparative Study between a Novel In Vivo Method and CBCT for Assessment of Ridge Alterations after Socket Preservation—Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Vasilena Ivanova ◽  
Ivan Chenchev ◽  
Stefan Zlatev ◽  
Georgi Iordanov ◽  
Eitan Mijiritsky
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation

The aim of this study was to compare two different methods for evaluation of alveolar bone resorption after the socket preservation procedure. In the current study, 9 patients with a total of nine teeth indicated for extraction were included. Patients received alveolar ridge preservation with allograft (BoneAlbumin™, OrthoSera Dental, Gyor, Hungary) or Platelet-Rich fibrin (PRF). CBCT (Planmeca ProMax 3D, Helsinki, Finland), was taken at 1 week and 4 months after the socket preservation procedure. A 3D scan, obtained with Trios (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) of the alveolar bone of the surgical site and the adjacent teeth at the place of extraction was performed during the surgical procedure, immediately after the graft placement in the alveolar socket, and after 4 months. Virtual study models were generated using the three-dimensional file processing software “Meshlab” (ISTI—CNR Rome Italy). The changes of alveolar height and width were measured and analyzed. Results were taken from both methods. Radiographic examination revealed that the average value of horizontal resorption is 0.6–2.4 mm, and vertical resorption is 0.46–2.8 mm. On virtual models, the average value for horizontal resorption is 1.92–3.64 mm, the vertical resorption value is 0.95–2.10 mm. The Trios intraoral scan can provide non-invasive and more accurate quantitative insights into the dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after the bone remodeling process. More research is needed for verification of these results.

scholarly journals The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Papi ◽  
Bianca Di Murro ◽  
Marco Tromba ◽  
Pier Carmine Passarelli ◽  
Antonio D’Addona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Ptfe Membrane ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
Ridge Width ◽  
One Year

The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem®, botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial.

scholarly journals The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1853
Author(s):  
João Cenicante ◽  
João Botelho ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Natural Consequence ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
The Past ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Alveolar ridge resorption is a natural consequence of teeth extraction, with unpleasant aesthetic and functional consequences that might compromise a future oral rehabilitation. To minimize the biological consequences of alveolar ridge resorption, several surgical procedures have been designed, the so-called alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques. One important characteristic is the concomitant use of biomaterial in ARP. In the past decade, autogenous teeth as a bone graft material in post-extraction sockets have been proposed with very interesting outcomes, yet with different protocols of preparation. Here we summarize the available evidence on autogenous teeth as a biomaterial in ARP, its different protocols and future directions.

scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study of how alveolar ridge preservation affects the need of alveolar ridge augmentation at posterior tooth implant sites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Fang Hu ◽  
Ying-Chu Lin ◽  
Yu-Ting Huang ◽  
Yu-Hsiang Chou
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Posterior Tooth ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Treatment Plans

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can reduce the need of ridge augmentation at posterior tooth sites. Material and methods This study enrolled patients who received dental implants at posterior tooth sites during 2013–2019. Demographic data and dental treatment histories were collected. Based on healing patterns after tooth extraction, patients were divided into ARP and spontaneous healing (SH) groups. Three surgical treatment plans were devised according to the alveolar bone volume on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The three treatment plans were to perform implant alone, simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation, and staged GBR before implantation. Statistical analyses were performed to determine relationships. Results There were 92 implant records in the ARP group and 249 implant records in the SH group. A significant intergroup difference was observed regarding the frequency distribution of the treatment modality of staged GBR before implant (χ2 = 15.07, p = 0.0005). Based on the implant alone treatment modality and simple logistic regression, the SH pattern was related to staged GBR before implant (SH vs. ARP: crude odds ratio (OR) = 4.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.15–11.61, p = 0.0003). After adjusting confounding factors, the risk was still significant (adjusted OR = 5.02, 95% CI = 2.26–12.85, p = 0.0002). Conclusions The study results suggested that ARP is more likely to lead to the treatment modality of implant alone and reduce the need for staged GBR before implantation. Clinical relevance This study describes ARP capable of minimizing the need for staged GBR before implantation and shortening the treatment duration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document