scholarly journals Corrigendum to “When do preschoolers learn specific mathematics skills? Mapping the development of early numeracy knowledge”. [J. Exp. Child Psychol. 195 (2020) 104846]

2021 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 105114
Author(s):  
Ellen C. Litkowski ◽  
Robert J. Duncan ◽  
Jessica A.R. Logan ◽  
David J. Purpura
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-174
Author(s):  
Allyson J. Kiss ◽  
Gena Nelson ◽  
Theodore J. Christ

Despite the vast research on the early predictors of mathematics achievement, little research has investigated the predictors of various domains of mathematics (e.g., geometry, statistics). The purpose of the present study was to examine the predictive relation between first-grade early numeracy and computation skills and third-grade mathematics achievement as measured by a state test. Furthermore, we explored the relations between these measures for students who were Below Proficient and Proficient. Findings suggest that proficiency level matters when examining the relation between mathematics skills. Also, there are different patterns of significant predictors depending on the domain of later mathematics achievement and whether or not reading achievement was considered. Findings are discussed in the context of mathematics learning for students with mathematics difficulty.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimena Cosso ◽  
Alexa Ellis ◽  
Connor D. O'Rear ◽  
Erica Zippert ◽  
Sara Schmitt ◽  
...  

There is a growing literature examining the association between parents’ math anxiety and children’s mathematics skills. Previous research has considered parents’ math anxiety as a unidimensional construct that primarily focused on parents’ experiences doing mathematics themselves. However, this research did not account for parents’ experiences when doing mathematics with their children. Thus, there were two goals of the present study: 1) to identify the structure of parents’ math anxiety when considering context-dependent situations, and 2) to determine whether parent math anxiety was related to children’s early numeracy skills. We conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses using a sample of 155 preschool children (M age = 4.20 years, SD = 0.71; 51% female). The best-fitting model of parents’ math anxiety was a bifactor model, suggesting parents’ math anxiety was best conceptualized as a multidimensional construct. However, structural equation models showed parent math anxiety was not a significant predictor of children’s numeracy performance. These findings provide a foundation for understanding parents’ math anxiety as multidimensional and raise questions about potential mechanisms that may explain prior work finding mixed relations between math anxiety and children’s numeracy performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 104846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen C. Litkowski ◽  
Robert J. Duncan ◽  
Jessica A.R. Logan ◽  
David J. Purpura

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1633-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Purpura ◽  
Jessica A. R. Logan ◽  
Brenna Hassinger-Das ◽  
Amy R. Napoli

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer McDonald ◽  
Rebecca Merkley ◽  
Jacqueline Mickle ◽  
Lisa Collimore ◽  
Daniel Ansari

Research in cognitive development has highlighted that early numeracy skills are associated with later math achievement, suggesting that these skills should be targeted in early math education. Here we tested whether tools used by researchers to assess mathematical thinking could be useful in the classroom. This paper describes a collaborative project between cognitive scientists and school board researchers/educators implementing numeracy screeners with kindergarten students over the course of three school years. The Give-A-Number task (Wynn, 1990) was used with first-year kindergarten students and the Numeracy Screener [BLINDED] with second-year kindergarten students. Results indicated that educators (N = 59) found the tools feasible to implement and helpful for exploring their students’ thinking and targeting instruction. The Educators’ feedback also helped inform improvements to the implementation of the tools and future directions for both the schools and the researchers. This work emphasizes the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration to address the research-practice gap.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Clarke ◽  
Gulcan Cil ◽  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
Marah Sutherland ◽  
Jessica Turtura ◽  
...  

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112110039
Author(s):  
Kesha N. Hudson ◽  
Michael T. Willoughby

The Canadian Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (Little DCDQ-CA) is a parent-report screening instrument that identifies 3- to 4-year-old children who may be at risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). We tested the factor structure and criterion validity of the Little DCDQ-CA in a sample of preschool-aged children in the United States ( N = 233). Factor analysis indicated that the DCDQ-CA was best represented by one factor. Using cutoff scores that were proposed by the developer, 45% of the sample was identified as at-risk for DCD. Although a much larger percentage of children was identified as at-risk than would be expected based on the prevalence of formal DCD diagnoses in the population, the Little DCDQ-CA demonstrated good criterion validity. Specifically, compared with their peers, children who exceeded the at-risk criterion demonstrated worse motor competence, executive functioning skills, and early numeracy skills and were rated as having greater ADHD behaviors by their teachers, all consistent with expectations for children who are at risk for DCD. Results are discussed as they relate to future use of the Little DCDQ-CA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document