Does Early and Appropriate Antibiotic Administration Improve Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock?

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sherwin ◽  
Michael E. Winters ◽  
Gary M. Vilke ◽  
Gabriel Wardi
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Chang Huang ◽  
Chi-Chieh Hung ◽  
Yong-Ye Yang ◽  
Tsung-Han Wang ◽  
Yin-Chou Hsu

Abstract Culture results in patients with septic shock affect their management strategies. Our study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with culture-negative septic shock (CNSS) and culture-positive septic shock (CPSS). A single-center, retrospective, case-control study included adult patients diagnosed with septic shock in the emergency department between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020. They were divided into CNSS and CPSS groups based on their culture results. Patients with CPSS (63.7%, 311/488) and CNSS (36.3%, 177/488) were identified. The CPSS and CNSS groups had comparable clinical outcomes, including mechanical ventilation (29.6% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.46), renal replacement therapy (19.3% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.31), intensive care unit care (51.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.16), 30-day (35.7% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.82) and in-hospital mortality (39.5% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.63). The duration (13 [8−19] vs. 16 [10−23], days, p = 0.04) and de-escalation timing (5 [2−10] vs. 9 [7−12], day, p = 0.02) of antibiotic administration in the CNSS group was significantly shorter and earlier than in the CPSS group. Patients with CNSS and CPSS had similar clinical characteristics and adverse outcome proportions. Physicians can evaluate the feasibility of early de-escalation or discontinuation of antibiotic administration in CNSS patients with clinical improvement.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1257-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. J. Macdonald ◽  
Glenn Arendts ◽  
Daniel M. Fatovich ◽  
Simon G. A. Brown

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document