Mediating and moderating effects of a client focus on the innovation–financial performance relationship

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 101611
Author(s):  
Nor’Aini Yusof ◽  
Amy Marisa ◽  
Lai Kong Seng
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Moderating Effects

The bright and dark sides of green customer integration (GCI): evidence from Chinese manufacturers

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiwen Feng ◽  
Hongyan Sheng ◽  
Minghui Li
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Information Sharing ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Resource Dependence Theory ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Opportunistic Behavior ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Customer Integration ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

PurposeBased on resource dependence theory and transaction cost economics this study explores how green customer integration (GCI) affects financial performance via information sharing and opportunistic behavior, and the moderating effects of dependence and trust.Design/methodology/approachThis study develops a theoretical model and tests it using data from two-waved survey data of 206 Chinese manufacturers. The hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear regression analysis.FindingsThe results show that GCI has a significant and positive impact on information sharing, but its impact on opportunistic behavior is insignificant. Notably, information sharing has a significant and positive impact on financial performance, while opportunistic behavior has an insignificant impact on financial performance. In addition, dependence negatively moderates the impact of GCI on information sharing and positively moderates the impact of GCI on opportunistic behavior. Trust negatively moderates the impact of GCI on opportunistic behavior.Originality/valueAlthough GCI has received widespread attention, how it affects a firm's performance remains unclear. Most previous studies have focused only on its bright side and ignored its dark side. This study highlights how GCI affects financial performance through information sharing and opportunistic behavior, and the moderating effects of dependence and trust. This enriches the understanding of how and under what conditions GCI affects a firm's performance.

THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ADAPTIVE AND INTELLECTUAL RESOURCE CAPABILITIES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850026 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAMUEL ADOMAKO
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Entrepreneurial Orientation ◽  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
Intellectual Resource ◽  
The Relationship

Extant entrepreneurial orientation (EO) literature suggests that EO positively affects firm performance, but several factors influence the potency of this relationship. However, the influence of adaptive and intellectual resource capabilities on the EO–performance linkage lacks theoretical clarity. Accordingly, deriving insights from the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities framework, this paper argues that variations in financial performance are a function of degree of EO and levels of adaptive and intellectual resource capabilities. Using primary data gathered from 245 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in Ghana, the study finds that when a firm’s adaptive and intellectual resource capabilities are well developed and deployed, the potency of EO as a driver of financial performance is enhanced.

The moderating effects of environmental risk of the industry on the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Semenova ◽  
Lars G. Hassel
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Environmental Risk ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – Industries differ in their environmental impacts, such as emissions, water and energy use, fuel consumption and hazardous wastes, which will have implications for how environmental performance translates to operating performance and market value at company level. By incorporating industry-specific differences of environmental impacts, this paper includes industry-level environmental risk as a moderating factor on the relationship between two indicators of corporate environmental performance (CEP) (management and policy) and corporate financial performance (profitability and market value). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using panel data of US companies across all industries, the paper empirically tests a regression model, which includes an interaction effect representing both the form and strength of dependency of CEP on the environmental risk of the industry. The paper adopts the natural resource based theory to argue that financial returns are a decreasing function of CEP in high environmental impact industries, where environmental spending beyond compliance is costly and there is not much opportunity for consumer orientation. Findings – The results show that environmental management has different impacts on operating performance at high and low environmental risk of the industry (form of relationship) while environmental policy (reporting) has a stronger signal on market premium in industries with low rather than high environmental risk (strength of relationship). Differences in both form and strength of moderating effects are demonstrated. Research limitations/implications – Further research can introduce other industry-specific moderating factors, such as the disclosure maturity of the industry and the institutionalization of environmental disclosures across boarders in the industries, in order to explore the complexity of the relationship. Practical implications – The results of the paper are relevant to investors, company managers and a broad group of stakeholders when considering both industry- and company-level environmental risks. Originality/value – Previous studies have relied on controlling for industry membership. This paper uses an industry-specific environmental variable, environmental risk of the industry, to examine the form and strength of moderating effects.

The moderating effects of a board of directors on FDI’s international diversification in Turkey

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kader Şahin ◽  
Seyfettin Artan ◽  
Seda Tuysuz
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
International Diversification ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Moderator Variable ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the moderating effects of a board of directors on foreign direct investment (FDI)’s international diversification in Turkey. Design/methodology/approach – A sample of Turkish multinational firms with FDI was used. Two different aspects of international diversification were considered: the relationship between international diversification and financial performance and the moderating effect of board composition on the relationship between international diversification and the firm’s financial performance. Firm-level data were obtained from the Istanbul Stock Exchange in Turkey. Findings – The findings reveal that international diversification leads to better financial performance according to market-based measures. On the other hand, this study indicates that the board characteristics have a moderating effect on international diversification and financial performance. Research limitations/implications – The study is based on a sample of publicly listed firms in Turkey, and this restriction limits the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications – The internalization efforts of Turkish FDI have led to better financial performance in terms of market-based measures. The results have stated that the interest of independent outside directors is aligned with lower-risk investment decisions. Independence of independent outside directors in Turkey is interrogated by practitioners or the Capital Markets Board of Turkey. The larger board size which a moderator variable is provided, the wider shareholder value in Turkey is. Social implications – One can understand that the development of market-supporting institutions provides the support for entry to an emerging economy which is inefficient or incomplete markets and highly concentrated family ownership. Originality/value – These findings provide important implications for corporate governance and highlight the need for further research on the role of governance in firm internationalization. This study not only helps to understand how board characteristics affect the choice of international diversification decisions, but the results also allow to assess the performance implications of these choices for a particular period.

scholarly journals Reassessing Supply Chain Fit: A Look at Moderating Factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Afresco Brazhkin
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Environmental Uncertainty ◽  
Supply Chain Design ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Product Diversity ◽  
Geographic Dispersion ◽  
Moderating Factors ◽  
The Relationship

Numerous studies have stressed the critical nature of aligning a product's attributes to its supply chain design (i.e., supply chain fit). Fisher (1997) developed the concept of supply chain fit, stating that enterprises must evaluate the nature of their products' demand before constructing a supply chain. I extend Fisher's (1997) paradigm by providing a more thorough understanding of when firms should invest in supply chain fit. I argue that assuming that perfect supply chain fit always results in enhanced financial performance is oversimplistic, as the benefits of perfect supply chain fit may be outweighed by the resources expended to attain it. To conduct this research, I will use archival and survey data to examine the moderating effects of six dimensions of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain fit and financial performance (e.g., munificence, market dynamism, technological dynamism, technical complexity, product diversity, and geographic dispersion).

When does it pay to stand out as stand-up? Competitive contingencies in the corporate social performance–corporate financial performance relationship

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gras ◽  
Ryan Krause
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Social Orientation ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Contingency Model ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Strategic Differentiation

We develop a competitive contingency model of the relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance, focusing on the moderating effects of industry-based factors. We conceptualize corporate social performance as a form of strategic differentiation and predict that the positive link between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance is strongest when a firm competes in an environment that is not conducive to corporate social performance. Analyses of data from roughly 2500 publicly traded firms between 2002 and 2009 support the moderating effects of industry munificence and social orientation. We discuss the implications of our contingency model for firms seeking a competitive advantage through corporate social performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document