Social network connections and increased preparation intentions for a disaster

Author(s):  
Joy E. Losee ◽  
Gregory D. Webster ◽  
Christopher McCarty
2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Brown ◽  
Katharine D. Drake

ABSTRACT This study examines (1) whether network ties help explain variation in tax avoidance, and (2) how the relation between network ties and tax avoidance varies depending on the nature and context of those ties. We posit that information on a range of tax-avoidance strategies is shared among firms through their social network connections. Using board interlocks to proxy for these connections, we find that firms with greater board ties to low-tax firms have lower cash ETRs themselves. Ties to low-tax firms are more influential when the focal firm and its network partner are operationally and strategically similar, as are ties created by executive directors. Board ties to low-tax firms are also more influential when the focal firm and its network partner engage the same local auditor. Overall, our results suggest that the influence of firms' network ties on their tax-avoidance behavior depends on the character of those ties.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1176-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Zárate ◽  
Gordon Nagayama Hall ◽  
Victoria C. Plaut

Fame and eminence, as traditionally measured, limit the definition of impact to the publication world. We add two types of impact to the traditional measures of fame and eminence. Many of the traditional measures of fame or eminence are based on social-network connections, whereby individuals appoint other people to positions of eminence. Editorial boards are one specific example. Eminence is also limited to number of publications, for example, with little regard for the impact of those publications at the societal level. In addition to the dominant measures of eminence, societal impact broadens the definition of impact to reflect real-world changes. Two examples include mentoring, which is rarely mentioned as a criterion for eminence, and policy value, such as when research influences important public policy. These additions are discussed in reference to the general underrepresentation of researchers of color in academia.


Author(s):  
Cindi Smatt ◽  
Molly McLure Wasko

The concept of a community of practice is emerging as an essential building block of the knowledge economy. Brown and Duguid (2001) argue that organizations should be conceptualized as consisting of autonomous communities whose interactions can foster innovation within an organization and accelerate the introduction of innovative ideas. The key to competitive advantage depends on a firm’s ability to coordinate across autonomous communities of practice internally and leverage the knowledge that flows into these communities from network connections (Brown & Duguid, 2001). But how does an organization do this? A key challenge for management is understanding how to balance strategies that capture knowledge without killing it (Brown & Duguid, 2000).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toman Barsbai ◽  
Victoria Licuanan ◽  
Andreas Steinmayr ◽  
Erwin Tiongson ◽  
Dean Yang

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toman Barsbai ◽  
Victoria Licuanan ◽  
Andreas Steinmayr ◽  
Erwin R. Tiongson ◽  
Dean Yang

Author(s):  
Martin Kilduff ◽  
Jung Won Lee

Social networks involve ties (and their absence) between people in social settings such as organizations. Yet much social network research, given its roots in sociology, ignores the individuality of people in emphasizing the constraints of the structural positions that people occupy. A recent movement to bring people back into social network research draws on the rich history of social psychological research to show that ( a) personality (i.e., self-monitoring) is key to understanding individuals’ occupation of social network positions, ( b) individuals’ perceptions of social networks relate to important outcomes, and ( c) relational energy is transmitted through social network connections. Research at different levels of analysis includes the network around the individual (the ego network), dyadic ties, triadic structures, and whole networks of interacting individuals. We call for future research concerning personality and structure, social network change, perceptions of networks, and cross-cultural differences in how social network connections are understood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document