scholarly journals Predictive value of geriatric oncology screening and geriatric assessment of older patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial protocol (PROGNOSIS-RCT)

Author(s):  
Ann-Kristine Weber Giger ◽  
Helena Møgelbjerg Ditzel ◽  
Trine Lembrecht Jørgensen ◽  
Henrik Jørn Ditzel ◽  
Afsaneh Mohammadnejad ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M Tetzlaff ◽  
An-Wen Chan ◽  
Jessica Kitchen ◽  
Margaret Sampson ◽  
Andrea C Tricco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 10022-10030
Author(s):  
Yicheng Cheng ◽  
Lihua Zheng ◽  
Yuying Shi ◽  
Congcong Zhi ◽  
Jiaying Shan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Tina Hsu ◽  
Nienke A. de Glas ◽  
Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti ◽  
...  

Aging is a heterogeneous process. Most newly diagnosed cancers occur in older adults, and it is important to understand a patient’s underlying health status when making treatment decisions. A geriatric assessment provides a detailed evaluation of medical, psychosocial, and functional problems in older patients with cancer. Specifically, it can identify areas of vulnerability, predict survival and toxicity, assist in clinical treatment decisions, and guide interventions in routine oncology practice; however, the uptake is hampered by limitations in both time and resources, as well as by a lack of expert interpretation. In this review, we describe the utility of geriatric assessment by using an illustrative case and provide a practical approach to geriatric assessment in oncology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (24) ◽  
pp. 2595-2603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Wildiers ◽  
Pieter Heeren ◽  
Martine Puts ◽  
Eva Topinkova ◽  
Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen ◽  
...  

Purpose To update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on geriatric assessment (GA) in older patients with cancer. Methods SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care. Results GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensity. The panel recommended that the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health status, fatigue, social status and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes. Although several combinations of tools and various models are available for implementation of GA in oncology practice, the expert panel could not endorse one over another. Conclusion There is mounting data regarding the utility of GA in oncology practice; however, additional research is needed to continue to strengthen the evidence base.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document