Comparison of sodium alginate-based and sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials based on rheological analysis

Author(s):  
Ryohei Hirose ◽  
Naoto Watanabe ◽  
Yuji Naito ◽  
Hikaru Hashimoto ◽  
Satoshi Sugino ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohei Hirose ◽  
Takuma Yoshida ◽  
Yuji Naito ◽  
Naoto Watanabe ◽  
Hikaru Hashimoto ◽  
...  

AbstractIn Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Dong ◽  
Lili Zhao ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Zhining Fan

Gut and Liver ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 027-032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Hoon Eun ◽  
Joo Young Cho ◽  
In Seop Jung ◽  
Bong Min Ko ◽  
Soo Jin Hong ◽  
...  

Marine Drugs ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Masanori Mori ◽  
Rintaro Asahi ◽  
Yoshihiro Yamamoto ◽  
Takanobu Mashiko ◽  
Kayo Yoshizumi ◽  
...  

Filler injection demand is increasing worldwide, but no ideal filler with safety and longevity currently exists. Sodium alginate (SA) is the sodium salt of alginic acid, which is a polymeric polysaccharide obtained by linear polymerization of two types of uronic acid, d-mannuronic acid (M) and l-guluronic acid (G). This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic value of SA. Nine SA types with different M/G ratios and viscosities were tested and compared with a commercially available sodium hyaluronate (SH) filler. Three injection modes (onto the periosteum, intradermally, or subcutaneously) were used in six rats for each substance, and the animals were sacrificed at 4 or 24 weeks. Changes in the diameter and volume were measured macroscopically and by computed tomography, and histopathological evaluations were performed. SA with a low M/G ratio generally maintained skin uplift. The bulge gradually decreased over time but slightly increased at 4 weeks in some samples. No capsule formation was observed around SA. However, granulomatous reactions, including macrophage recruitment, were observed 4 weeks after SA implantation, although fewer macrophages and granulomatous reactions were observed at 24 weeks. The long-term volumizing effects and degree of granulomatous reactions differed depending on the M/G ratio and viscosity. By contrast, SH showed capsule formation but with minimal granulomatous reactions. The beneficial and adverse effects of SA as a filler differed according to the viscosity or M/G ratio, suggesting a better long-term volumizing effect than SH with relatively low immunogenicity


2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Kawata ◽  
Keijiro Sunada ◽  
Kiichi Satoh ◽  
Yoshinari Kaneko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document