Laparoscopic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Uterine Preservation: Surgical Techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. S128
Author(s):  
X. Guan ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
Z. Guan ◽  
K. Blazek ◽  
L. Pan ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2073
Author(s):  
Liliana Mereu ◽  
Francesca Dalprà ◽  
Saverio Tateo

Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) refers to a spectrum of surgical techniques that allow the performance of laparoscopic surgery through consolidation of all ports into one surgical incision. LESS has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to multiport laparoscopy and in the last year in gynecology; hence, this approach has been largely applied for selective indications to perform total hysterectomy. We performed a literature review on single site hysterectomy and described indications and technique, highlighting practical problems, pointers, limitations and recent technical development as robotic assistance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Weibl ◽  
Hans-Christoph Klingler ◽  
Tobias Klatte ◽  
Mesut Remzi

Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site surgery (LESS) for kidney diseases is quickly evolving and has a tendency to expand the urological armory of surgical techniques. However, we should not be overwhelmed by the surgical skills only and weight it against the basic clinical and oncological principles when compared to standard laparoscopy. The initial goal is to define the ideal candidates and ideal centers for LESS in the future. Modification of basic instruments in laparoscopy presumably cannot result in better functional and oncological outcomes, especially when the optimal working space is limited with the same arm movements. Single port surgery is considered minimally invasive laparoscopy; on the other hand, when using additional ports, it is no more single port, but hybrid traditional laparoscopy. Whether LESS is a superior or equally technique compared to traditional laparoscopy has to be proven by future prospective randomized trials.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Röthlin

Anhand der Pseudozysteneinteilung nach D'Egidio und Schein werden die verschiedenen chirurgischen Techniken der Pseudozystendrainage und -resektion diskutiert. Die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der laparoskopischen Technik werden dargestellt. Auf die "Konkurrenz" der endoskopischen und interventionellen Therapien wird lediglich am Rand verwiesen. Prognostisch hängt der weitere Verlauf nach Pseudozystenoperation weniger von der Operationstechnik, als vom natürlichen Verlauf der Erkrankung (chron. Pankreatitis) und vom Sistieren, bzw. Weiterbestehen der zugrundeliegenden Noxe ab.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartanusz ◽  
Porchet

The treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is complex. The three treatment modalities that are currently applied (in a histologically non-specific manner) are surgery, radiotherapy and the administration of steroids. The development of new spinal instrumentations and surgical approaches considerably changed the extent of therapeutic options in this field. These new surgical techniques have made it possible to resect these tumours totally, with subsequent vertebral reconstruction and spinal stabilization. In this respect, it is important to clearly identify those patients who can benefit from such an extensive surgery. We present our management algorithm to help select patients for surgery and at the same time identifying those for whom primary non-surgical therapy would be indicated. The retrospective review of surgically treated patients in our department in the last four years reveals a meagre application of conventional guidelines for the selection of the appropriate operative approach in the surgical management of these patients. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Redwan ◽  
C Biancosino ◽  
G Wöbker ◽  
F Giebel ◽  
R Zanner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document