Hysteroscopic Resection vs Blind Dilation and Curettage (D&C) for Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. S15
Author(s):  
A. Di Spiezio Sardo ◽  
E. Mastantuoni ◽  
G. Saccone ◽  
C. Ferrara ◽  
B. Zizolfi ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunhui Tang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Hanqing Tang ◽  
Jiahui Che ◽  
Hua Feng ◽  
...  

IntroductionCesarean scar pregnancy affects 6% of all ectopic pregnancies in women with prior cesarean section, and there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment. Options of surgical treatment have a risk of intraoperative blood loss; therefore, uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been considered as an option of reducing intraoperative blood loss. However, UAE may be overused in clinical practice, especially in China. We present this protocol for a randomized clinical trial investigating the necessity of performing UAE for cesarean scar pregnancy, in combination with surgical suction curettage, taking into account the different subtypes of cesarean scar pregnancy. We recently developed a risk-scoring system (QRS) to estimate intraoperative blood loss, with 93.8% sensitivity and 6.3% false negative. Through this randomized clinical trial, we will retrospectively validate the QRS score on predicting intraoperative blood loss.Methods and AnalysisWe propose undertaking a randomized clinical trial sequentially recruiting 200 patients. All the patients will randomly receive ultrasound guided curettage with or without UAE. Data on the subtypes of cesarean scar pregnancy (Types 1 and II and III) detected by ultrasound will be collected before operation. The score on estimating intraoperative blood loss assessed by our recently developed quantitative risk-scoring system (QRS) will be collected before the operation. We will primarily compare the duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, and complications between the two groups. We will also retrospectively analyze the association of subtypes of cesarean scar pregnancy and the options of treatment and validate the QRS score. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy within the 2-year follow-up will be secondary outcomes.Trial Registration Number[website], identifier ChiCTR2100041654.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 411
Author(s):  
Felice Sorrentino ◽  
Vincenzo De Feo ◽  
Guglielmo Stabile ◽  
Raffaele Tinelli ◽  
Maurizio Nicola D’Alterio ◽  
...  

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy which represents a consequence of a previous cesarean section. It is associated with major maternal morbidity and mortality and has potential implications on future fertility. Because of possible serious complications, CSP should be swiftly diagnosed and treated. There is no management protocol for this rare, life-threatening condition, and each patient should be evaluated individually. Several types of conservative treatment have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancy: dilation and curettage (D&C), excision of trophoblastic tissues, local or systemic administration of methotrexate, bilateral hypogastric artery ligation, and selective uterine artery embolization with curettage and/or methotrexate administration. In our study we present a cesarean scar pregnancy of a 40-year-old woman who was treated with angiographic uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic diode laser resection. Our combined UAE–hysteroscopic laser surgery appears to offer an effective, safe, and minimally invasive surgical treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 302 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Liang Tan ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Yu-Mei Chen ◽  
Ying Meng ◽  
Bang-Quan Lv ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suqing Liu ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
Bin Cai ◽  
Xiaowei Xi ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1165-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amartuvshin Tumenjargal ◽  
Hiroyuki Tokue ◽  
Hiroshi Kishi ◽  
Hiromi Hirasawa ◽  
Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document