scholarly journals Relationship of Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale to feeding performance of premature infants

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Bingham ◽  
Taka Ashikaga ◽  
Soraya Abbasi
2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512500030p1-7512500030p1
Author(s):  
Tsu-Hsin Howe ◽  
Ching-Fan Sheu

Abstract Date Presented 04/23/21 The Neonatal Oral–Motor Assessment Scale is a clinical tool commonly used to evaluate the oral–motor skills of neonates. This study is to examine its predictability in feeding performance using newly organized items. The results showed that in addition to the adjusted age and weight at observed feed, jaw depression and jaw initiation were the significant predictors for successful bottle feed. Discuss implications of findings and the need for standardized assessment in neonates' feeding. Primary Author and Speaker: Tsu-Hsin Howe Additional Authors and Speakers: Christine L. Kroll


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saakje P. da Costa ◽  
Nicole Hübl ◽  
Nicole Kaufman ◽  
Arend F. Bos

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1115-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cori Zarem ◽  
Hiroyuki Kidokoro ◽  
Jeffrey Neil ◽  
Michael Wallendorf ◽  
Terrie Inder ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-387
Author(s):  
Alireza Alidad ◽  
Maryam Tarameshlu ◽  
Leila Ghelichi ◽  
Hamid Haghani

PURPOSE: Feeding problems are common in premature infants (PIs) and may lead to negative consequences such as malnutrition, dehydration, excessive weight loss, as well as developmental and psychological deficits. Moreover, they are associated with increased length of hospital stay/cost. There is not enough evidence on how feeding problems should be treated in PIs. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of non-nutritive sucking combined with oral motor stimulation and oral support on feeding performance in PIs. METHODS: A single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 44 PIs with feeding problems. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups: (1) combined intervention (CI) and (2) non-nutritive sucking (NNS). The CI group received NNS, oral motor stimulation and oral support simultaneously. Infants in both groups received 14 treatment sessions for 14 consecutive days. The Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) was used as the primary outcome measure. Weight, volume of milk intake, time to achieve full oral feeding, and length of hospital stay were secondary outcome measures. All measures were assessed before treatment, after the 7th session, after the 14th session, and after 7 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Both groups improved in all outcome measures across time (P < 0.001). The improvements in the POFRAS, volume of milk intake, and time to achieve full oral feeding were significantly greater in the CI group than the NNS group (P < 0.001). The improvements attained in weight and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the CI and NNS groups (P > 0.05). Large effect sizes were found for POFRAS score in both CI (d = 3.98) and NNS (d = 2.19) groups. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that the combined intervention including NNS, oral motor stimulation, and oral support significantly improved the feeding performance in PIs.


Revista CEFAC ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Coube de Carvalho Yamamoto ◽  
Leila Sauer Prade ◽  
Geovana de Paula Bolzan ◽  
Angela Regina Maciel Weinmann ◽  
Márcia Keske-Soares

ABSTRACT Objective: this study aimed at investigating the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA) tool to be used with preterm infants and to compare its results with the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) to start oral feeding. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study, consisting in a sample of 45 healthy and clinically stable preterm infants, assessed at their first oral feeding with two tools: the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment and Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale. Stata 10.0 software was used for data analysis. Results: 10 preterm infants with readiness for oral feeding showed normal oral motor function, and 16, presented with oral motor dysfunction, did not show readiness for feeding (p <0.05). The time of transition for full oral feeding was 13.5 (± 8.1) days for preterm infants with better results in both assessment tools, and 17.7 (± 10.9) days for those who did not show readiness for oral feeding and had oral motor dysfunction to initiate oral feeding, resulting in a given clinical relevance, even showing no significance (p> 0.05). Conclusion: these results suggest that the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment can be an adjunctive method for evaluation of the oral motor function at the first oral feeding in preterm infants.


2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saakje P Da Costa ◽  
Cees P Van Der Schans

2016 ◽  
Vol 105 (8) ◽  
pp. e339-e344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saakje P. da Costa ◽  
Nicole Hübl ◽  
Nicole Kaufman ◽  
Arend F. Bos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document