scholarly journals West syndrome in patients with down syndrome. Clinical description and management

2015 ◽  
Vol 357 ◽  
pp. e440
Author(s):  
C. Rojas ◽  
S. Witting ◽  
P. Ortega ◽  
F. Faure ◽  
J. Gutiérrez
2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oranee Sanmaneechai ◽  
Yoshimi Sogawa ◽  
Wendy Silver ◽  
Karen Ballaban-Gil ◽  
Solomon L. Moshé ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 3547-3562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Pavone ◽  
Agata Polizzi ◽  
Simona Domenica Marino ◽  
Giovanni Corsello ◽  
Raffaele Falsaperla ◽  
...  

Abstract Since its first clinical description (on his son) by William James West (1793–1848) in 1841, and the definition of the classical triad of (1) infantile spasms; (2) hypsarrhythmia, and (3) developmental arrest or regression as “West syndrome”, new and relevant advances have been recorded in this uncommon disorder. New approaches include terminology of clinical spasms (e.g., infantile (IS) vs. epileptic spasms (ES)), variety of clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) features (e.g., typical ictal phenomena without EEG abnormalities), burden of developmental delay, spectrum of associated genetic abnormalities, pathogenesis, treatment options, and related outcome and prognosis. Aside the classical manifestations, IS or ES may present with atypical electroclinical phenotypes (e.g., subtle spasms; modified hypsarrhythmia) and may have their onset outside infancy. An increasing number of genes, proteins, and signaling pathways play crucial roles in the pathogenesis. This condition is currently regarded as a spectrum of disorders: the so-called infantile spasm syndrome (ISs), in association with other causal factors, including structural, infectious, metabolic, syndromic, and immunologic events, all acting on a genetic predisposing background. Hormonal therapy and ketogenic diet are widely used also in combination with (classical and recent) pharmacological drugs. Biologically targeted and gene therapies are increasingly studied. The present narrative review searched in seven electronic databases (primary MeSH terms/keywords included West syndrome, infantile spasms and infantile spasms syndrome and were coupled to 25 secondary clinical, EEG, therapeutic, outcomes, and associated conditions terms) including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Sciences, Pubmed, Scopus, and OMIM to highlight the past knowledge and more recent advances.


2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 447-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madoka Kajimoto ◽  
Takashi Ichiyama ◽  
Akiko Akashi ◽  
Naoko Suenaga ◽  
Hironori Matsufuji ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hechmi Ben Hamouda ◽  
Hanen Mnasri ◽  
Sobhi Ghanmi ◽  
Habib Soua ◽  
Gazi Sakli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephen R. Hooper ◽  
Julie Hammer

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of significant intellectual disability in humans. It was one of the first chromosomal disorders of humans to be associated with intellectual disabilities and, as such, has provided an evidence-based foundation from which work on many different disorders has been launched. John Langdon Down first described this syndrome in 1866 using the term mongoloid idiocy. The initial clinical description of DS comprised physical features (e.g., epicanthal folds, flat and broad face, enlarged tongue, microcephaly, short stature) and cognitive characteristics (e.g., intellectual impairment, fine and gross motor coordination problems, poor speech articulation). He also described a relatively positive personality in these individuals. Contemporary topographical descriptions are remarkably similar to Down’s description nearly 150 years ago, but a variety of other healthrelated issues have been uncovered since that time including congenital cardiac abnormalities, hypotonia, hearing and visual impairments, hypothyroidism, and precocious aging (Rasmussen, Whitehead, Collier, and Frias 2008). In accordance with the core tenets of this text, in this chapter we discuss epidemiology, etiology, and what is known about core pathophysiological mechanisms in DS; neurological abnormalities, including contemporary findings in neuroimaging; neurocognitive and socialbehavioral manifestations; and emergent evidencebased treatment efforts. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the phenotype-genotype linkages for DS, and a review of the priorities set by a national panel of experts in DS (Rasmussen et al. 2008). When compared to other congenital abnormalities, DS represents one of the most common disorders. Contemporary prevalence estimates indicate the occurrence of DS in approximately 9.0–11.8 (Shin et al. 2009) to 13.66 (Canfield et al. 2006) per 10,000 live births. The rate of infants born with DS also has a strong relationship with increasing maternal age. For example, a 20-year-old mother has a 1 in 1,923 chance of giving birth to an infant with Down syndrome, whereas the chance for a 49-year-old mother is 1 in 12 (Prescott 1988). The cause of this phenomenon, however, is not well understood (Lamb and Hassold 2004).


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 103922
Author(s):  
Magda McGregor-Schuerman ◽  
Audrey Lo Fo Sang ◽  
Santusha Bihari ◽  
Natasja Ramdajal ◽  
Ron F. Suijkerbuijk ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 112 (10) ◽  
pp. 1397-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Carter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document