Does temporal evolution occur in ictal high-frequency oscillations in patients with intractable partial epilepsy?: A concern about local field potentials vs. action potentials

2017 ◽  
Vol 381 ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
D. Fujii ◽  
K. Kobayashi ◽  
A. Shimotake ◽  
K. Kanazawa ◽  
T. Kikuchi ◽  
...  
Epilepsia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shennan Aibel Weiss ◽  
Catalina Alvarado-Rojas ◽  
Anatol Bragin ◽  
Eric Behnke ◽  
Tony Fields ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Watanabe ◽  
Mami Okada ◽  
Yuji Ikegaya

AbstractHippocampal ripples are transient neuronal features observed in high-frequency oscillatory bands of local field potentials, and they occur primarily during periods of behavioral immobility and slow-wave sleep. Ripples have been defined based on mathematically engineered features, such as magnitudes, durations, and cycles per event. However, the “ripples” could vary from laboratory to laboratory because their definition is subject to human bias, including the arbitrary choice of parameters and thresholds. In addition, local field potentials are often influenced by myoelectric noise arising from animal movement, making it difficult to distinguish ripples from high-frequency noises. To overcome these problems, we extracted ripple candidates under few constraints and labeled them as binary or stochastic “true” or “false” ripples using Gaussian mixed model clustering and a deep convolutional neural network in a weakly supervised fashion. Our automatic method separated ripples and myoelectric noise and was able to detect ripples even when the animals were moving. Moreover, we confirmed that a convolutional neural network was able to detect ripples defined by our method. Leave-one-animal-out cross-validation estimated the area under the precision-recall curve for ripple detection to be 0.72. Finally, our model establishes an appropriate threshold for the ripple magnitude in the case of the conventional detection of ripples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (36) ◽  
pp. E8567-E8576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilknur Telkes ◽  
Ashwin Viswanathan ◽  
Joohi Jimenez-Shahed ◽  
Aviva Abosch ◽  
Musa Ozturk ◽  
...  

Although motor subtypes of Parkinson’s disease (PD), such as tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD), have been defined based on symptoms since the mid-1990s, no underlying neural correlates of these clinical subtypes have yet been identified. Very limited data exist regarding the electrophysiological abnormalities within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) that likely accompany the symptom severity or the phenotype of PD. Here, we show that activity in subbands of local field potentials (LFPs) recorded with multiple microelectrodes from subterritories of STN provide distinguishing neurophysiological information about the motor subtypes of PD. We studied 24 patients with PD and found distinct patterns between TD (n = 13) and PIGD (n = 11) groups in high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and their nonlinear interactions with beta band in the superior and inferior regions of the STN. Particularly, in the superior region of STN, the power of the slow HFO (sHFO) (200–260 Hz) and the coupling of its amplitude with beta-band phase were significantly stronger in the TD group. The inferior region of STN exhibited fast HFOs (fHFOs) (260–450 Hz), which have a significantly higher center frequency in the PIGD group. The cross-frequency coupling between fHFOs and beta band in the inferior region of STN was significantly stronger in the PIGD group. Our results indicate that the spatiospectral dynamics of STN-LFPs can be used as an objective method to distinguish these two motor subtypes of PD. These observations might lead to the development of sensing and stimulation strategies targeting the subterritories of STN for the personalization of deep-brain stimulation (DBS).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document