scholarly journals A comparison of knee joint biomechanics during free gait and cartilage T2 mapping values in healthy individuals in their twenties and forties

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S123-S124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ota ◽  
T. Nakamura ◽  
A. Ando ◽  
A. Fukuyama ◽  
A. Watanabe ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
L. van Kouwenhove ◽  
G.J. Verkerke ◽  
K. Postema ◽  
R. Dekker ◽  
J.M. Hijmans

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Nissan

The internal equilibrium of human joints has been dealt with by many investigators, either as a means for better understanding and treating joint diseases or as a basis for prosthetic design. In all cases there is less information than needed for an accurate solution, and the investigators have to use simplifying geometry and restricting assumptions. In this work a permutation method was used, which takes advantage of big computer facilities in order to reduce the number of assumptions needed. The method was used for the case of the knee joint. The results were compared to those available using a regular method, showing the permutation one to be superior.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulashi Simkheada ◽  
Gustavo A. Orozco ◽  
Rami K. Korhonen ◽  
Petri Tanska ◽  
Mika Mononen

Author(s):  
Nynke B. Rooks ◽  
Marco T. Y. Schneider ◽  
Ahmet Erdemir ◽  
Jason P. Halloran ◽  
Peter J. Laz ◽  
...  

Abstract Accurately capturing the bone and cartilage morphology and generating a mesh remains a critical step in the workflow of computational knee joint modeling. Currently there is no standardized method to compare meshes of different element types and nodal densities, making comparisons across research teams a significant challenge. The aim of this paper is to describe a method to quantify differences in knee joint bone and cartilages meshes, independent of bone and cartilage mesh topology. Bone mesh-to-mesh distances, subchondral bone boundaries and cartilage thicknesses from meshes of any type of mesh are obtained using a series of steps involving registration, resampling, and radial basis function fitting after which the comparisons are performed. Subchondral bone boundaries and cartilage thicknesses are calculated and visualized in a common frame of reference for comparison. The established method is applied to models developed by five modeling teams. Our approach to obtain bone mesh-to-mesh distances decreased the divergence seen in selecting a reference mesh (i.e. comparing mesh A-to-B vs. mesh B-to-A). In general the bone morphology was similar across teams. The cartilage thicknesses for all models were calculated and the mean absolute cartilage thickness difference was presented, the articulating areas had the best agreement across teams. The teams showed disagreement on the subchondral bone boundaries. The method presented in this paper allows for objective comparisons of bone and cartilage geometry that is agnostic to mesh type and nodal density.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jereme B. Outerleys ◽  
Michael J. Dunbar ◽  
Glen Richardson ◽  
Cheryl L. Hubley-Kozey ◽  
Janie L. Astephen Wilson

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery improves knee joint kinematics and kinetics during gait for most patients, but a lack of evidence exists for the level and incidence of improvement that is achieved. The objective of this study was to quantify patient-specific improvements in knee biomechanics relative to osteoarthritis (OA) severity levels. Seventy-two patients underwent 3-dimensional (3D) gait analysis before and 1 year after TKA surgery, as well as 72 asymptomatic adults and 72 with moderate knee OA. A combination of principal component analysis and discriminant analyses were used to categorize knee joint biomechanics for patients before and after surgery relative to asymptomatic, moderate, and severe OA. Post-TKA, 63% were categorized with knee biomechanics consistent with moderate OA, 29% with severe OA, and 8% asymptomatic. The magnitude and pattern of the knee adduction moment and angle (frontal plane features) were the most significant contributors in discriminating between pre-TKA and post-TKA knee biomechanics. Standard of care TKA improves knee biomechanics during gait to levels most consistent with moderate knee OA and predominately targets frontal plane features. These results provide evidence for the level of improvement in knee biomechanics that can be expected following surgery and highlight the biomechanics most targeted by surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document