Can ultrasonography reduce the need for CT scan in diagnosing acute appendicitis?

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076
Author(s):  
Jyotindu Debnath ◽  
R. Ravikumar ◽  
Roma Rai
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Nofal ◽  
Hayder Al-Masari ◽  
Marwan Mohammed Rashed ◽  
Reham Ainawi ◽  
Desh Idnani ◽  
...  

: Acute appendicitis in elderly continue to be a diagnostic dilemma as it raises both the suspicion of malignancy and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Cancers of the appendix are rare and most of them are found accidentally on appendectomies performed for acute appendicitis. When reviewed, majority of the tumors were carcinoid, adenoma, and lymphoma. Adenocarcinomas of appendix are only 0.08% of all cancers and the treatment remains controversial. This paper presents a case of 75-year-old female presented to emergency (ER) with signs and symptoms mimicking acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy was planned after a CT scan was done as it was suggesting acute appendicitis. The specimen then was sent foe pathology lab and a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the appendix was made.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvi Sippola ◽  
Juha Grönroos ◽  
Ville Sallinen ◽  
Tero Rautio ◽  
Pia Nordström ◽  
...  

IntroductionRecent studies show that antibiotic therapy is safe and feasible for CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Spontaneous resolution of acute appendicitis has already been observed over a hundred years ago. In CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (left-sided appendicitis), studies have shown no benefit from antibiotics compared with symptomatic treatment, but this shift from antibiotics to symptomatic treatment has not yet been widely implemented in clinical practice. Recently, symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis has been demonstrated in a Korean open-label study. However, a double-blinded placebo-controlled study to illustrate the role of antibiotics and spontaneous resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is still lacking.Methods and analysisThe APPAC III (APPendicitis ACuta III) trial is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority randomised study comparing antibiotic therapy with placebo in the treatment CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis aiming to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Adult patients (18–60 years) with CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis (the absence of appendicolith, abscess, perforation and tumour) will be enrolled in five Finnish university hospitals.Primary endpoint is success of the randomised treatment, defined as resolution of acute appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital without surgical intervention within 10 days after initiating randomised treatment (treatment efficacy). Secondary endpoints include postintervention complications, recurrent symptoms after treatment up to 1 year, late recurrence of acute appendicitis after 1 year, duration of hospital stay, sick leave, treatment costs and quality of life. A decrease of 15 percentage points in success rate is considered clinically important difference. The superiority of antibiotic treatment compared with placebo will be analysed using Fisher’s one-sided test and CI will be calculated for proportion difference.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Turku University Hospital and the Finnish Medicines Agency (FIMEA). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals.Trial registration numberNCT03234296; Pre-results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (40) ◽  
pp. 3005-3009
Author(s):  
Khawaja Bilal Waheed ◽  
Waseem Jan Shah ◽  
Ali Salman Alshehri ◽  
Bilal Altaf ◽  
Muhammad Amjad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1856-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong Geon Jeon ◽  
Hyuk Jung Kim ◽  
Seung Chul Heo
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Sam S Torbati ◽  
Theodore C Chan

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.1) ◽  
pp. 7051-7055
Author(s):  
Azhagiri R ◽  
◽  
Anitha M ◽  
Hemapriya J ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. e409-e411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Zama Ali ◽  
Loi Hoi Yin ◽  
Khor Lih Kin ◽  
Arvind Kumar Sinha ◽  
Li Mei Poon

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mejia ◽  
Roland Haj ◽  
Sutasinee Nithisoontorn ◽  
Martine A. Louis ◽  
Nageswara Mandava

We present the case of an 89-years-old female with an atypical presentation of an obstructive acute appendicitis secondary to a cecal carcinoma. The physical exam revealed a distended abdomen with bilateral lower quadrants tenderness without rebound or rigidity.  CT scan demonstrated distal small bowel obstruction and ruptured acute appendicitis. Patient was treated conservatively with nasogastric decompression, intravenous fluids, and antibiotics. She later underwent CT guided drainage of a rim-enhancing fluid collection and her symptoms eventually resolved. She returned a week later and a CT imaging showed high grade distal small bowel obstruction, and findings were a 4.5 cm diameter cecal mass. She underwent an exploratory laparotomy and modified right hemicolectomy with ileostomy for. She had an uneventful postoperative course. Pathology revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the cecum stage III T4N1Mx. Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency operation in the world. Appendicitis are often rare in elderly, with atypical or delayed presentation and expanded differential diagnosis, making preoperative diagnosis challenging. With the increase overall risk of cancer in this age group, occult colonic carcinoma should be high in the differential diagnosis. Three mechanisms potentially leading to obstruction of the appendiceal lumen by the tumor includes: immediate proximity to the lumen, inflammatory changes from the tumor, back pressure on the cecum causing obstruction of the appendix. Despite advances in imaging, local inflammation, collections, and masses may be misleading. The diagnostic accuracy of CT scan reportedly can be as low as 54% for cecal tumors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Ahmadi Amoli ◽  
Abbas Naeej ◽  
Neda Nilforoushan ◽  
Hossein Zabihi Mahmoudabadi ◽  
Ehsan Rahimpour ◽  
...  

Background: Acute appendicitis is one the most common and sometimes life threatening conditions in the Emergency Department referrals. Since suspected cases of acute appendicitis require immediate diagnosis and proper intervention, the computed tomography (CT) scan becomes the most frequently used modality for such conditions. However, due to the nature of emergency wards, gastrointestinal (GI) expert radiologists may not be always available. Objectives: The current study aimed at comparing the interobserver variability of GI expert radiologists, general radiologists, and radiology residents in in CT-scan interpretation of cases suspected of acute appendicitis. Methods: Seventy patients suspected of acute appendicitis admitted to the Emergency Department of our university hospital were included in the study. CT-scan with intravenous contrast was performed on patients that their Alvarado score ranged 5 to 8. Decision for surgical or non-surgical management of patients was made by the routine treatment team of hospital and retrospectively, CT-scan images of all 70 patients were reported blindly by three groups of radiologists. Results: Out of the 70 cases, 48 had positive confirmatory pathology for appendicitis (69%) and 22 had negative pathology report (31%). The sensitivity of the reports for radiology residents, general radiologists, and GI expert radiologists was 81.3%, 93.8% and 95.8%, respectively. The specificity of the diagnosis in the three groups was 72.7%, 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The study results showed that although the interpretation was not perfect, radiology residents and general radiologists can provide reports with acceptable sensitivity and specificity in the emergency ward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document