scholarly journals CT scan for suspected acute appendicitis

Author(s):  
David M. Widlus
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
K H i. Hof ◽  
G P Krestin ◽  
E W Steijerberg ◽  
H J Bonjer ◽  
J F Lange ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Saurabh . ◽  
Deepak Meena ◽  
G. L. Meena

Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the spiral-CT in patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Methods: Appendiceal spiral-CT was performed in 50 patients (21 women and 29 men) with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Scans were obtained from the L4 level to the symphysis pubis using 5 mm collimation without i.v., oral, or rectal contrast material. Prospective diagnoses based on CT findings were compared with histopathological results Results: In our study appendix diameter test sensitivity was 97.56%, specificity was 77.78 %, positive predictive value was 95.27%, negative predictive value was 87.50% and diagnostic accuracy was 94.00%. Conclusion: The accuracy of computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis was high. The results emphasize the role of computed tomography as an accurate modality in daily routine diagnostics for acute appendicitis in all clinical emergency settings. Key words: Appendicitis, CT scan, Accuracy.


1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1165
Author(s):  
Pil Yeob Choi ◽  
Sang Wook Lee ◽  
Jae Soo Kwon ◽  
Young Soon Sung ◽  
Myoung Ho Rho ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Nofal ◽  
Hayder Al-Masari ◽  
Marwan Mohammed Rashed ◽  
Reham Ainawi ◽  
Desh Idnani ◽  
...  

: Acute appendicitis in elderly continue to be a diagnostic dilemma as it raises both the suspicion of malignancy and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Cancers of the appendix are rare and most of them are found accidentally on appendectomies performed for acute appendicitis. When reviewed, majority of the tumors were carcinoid, adenoma, and lymphoma. Adenocarcinomas of appendix are only 0.08% of all cancers and the treatment remains controversial. This paper presents a case of 75-year-old female presented to emergency (ER) with signs and symptoms mimicking acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy was planned after a CT scan was done as it was suggesting acute appendicitis. The specimen then was sent foe pathology lab and a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the appendix was made.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carry Zheng ◽  
Shiela Lee ◽  
Steven Brown ◽  
Venkat Kanakala

Abstract Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of using a clinical prediction tool in the management of suspected acute appendicitis Methods Retrospective data was collected on patients undergoing appendicectomy at a single tertiary centre from November 2019 to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were all patients aged 18 and above undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Exclusion criteria were all patients that had a pathological finding other than appendicitis at laparoscopy. The pre operative AAS score at first presentation was calculated and patients grouped into low(0-10), intermediate(11-15), and high(16 and above) risk. These groups were then compared to the histological findings. Results A total of 74 patients were included, 44 male and 30 female. The age range was from 18 to 83, with a median age of 36. Of 10 patients in the low risk group, 4 (40%) had appendicitis on histology. 36 out of 40 (90%) patients in the intermediate risk group had appendicitis and 100% of the 24 patients in the high risk group. Pearson’s coefficient showed a significant correlation between the AAS risk (low, intermediate, and high) and the histological diagnosis of appendicitis (r = 0.48, p = 0.000016). Conclusions Our study did show a positive correlation between the AAS risk stratification and histological diagnosis. Based on our findings we would recommend the adoption of this score in assessing patients with suspected acute appendicitis and minimising the negative appendicectomy rate.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 620-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Gerbier ◽  
Aurélien Binet ◽  
Mathilde Etancelin ◽  
Emmanuel Barteau ◽  
Marie Auger ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1597-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang-Yu Wang ◽  
Jen-Feng Fang ◽  
Chien-Hung Liao ◽  
I-Ming Kuo ◽  
Chun-Hsiang Ou Yang ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvi Sippola ◽  
Juha Grönroos ◽  
Ville Sallinen ◽  
Tero Rautio ◽  
Pia Nordström ◽  
...  

IntroductionRecent studies show that antibiotic therapy is safe and feasible for CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Spontaneous resolution of acute appendicitis has already been observed over a hundred years ago. In CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (left-sided appendicitis), studies have shown no benefit from antibiotics compared with symptomatic treatment, but this shift from antibiotics to symptomatic treatment has not yet been widely implemented in clinical practice. Recently, symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis has been demonstrated in a Korean open-label study. However, a double-blinded placebo-controlled study to illustrate the role of antibiotics and spontaneous resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is still lacking.Methods and analysisThe APPAC III (APPendicitis ACuta III) trial is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority randomised study comparing antibiotic therapy with placebo in the treatment CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis aiming to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Adult patients (18–60 years) with CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis (the absence of appendicolith, abscess, perforation and tumour) will be enrolled in five Finnish university hospitals.Primary endpoint is success of the randomised treatment, defined as resolution of acute appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital without surgical intervention within 10 days after initiating randomised treatment (treatment efficacy). Secondary endpoints include postintervention complications, recurrent symptoms after treatment up to 1 year, late recurrence of acute appendicitis after 1 year, duration of hospital stay, sick leave, treatment costs and quality of life. A decrease of 15 percentage points in success rate is considered clinically important difference. The superiority of antibiotic treatment compared with placebo will be analysed using Fisher’s one-sided test and CI will be calculated for proportion difference.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Turku University Hospital and the Finnish Medicines Agency (FIMEA). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals.Trial registration numberNCT03234296; Pre-results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (40) ◽  
pp. 3005-3009
Author(s):  
Khawaja Bilal Waheed ◽  
Waseem Jan Shah ◽  
Ali Salman Alshehri ◽  
Bilal Altaf ◽  
Muhammad Amjad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document