Return to sport outcomes in the younger anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patient

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e82
Author(s):  
K. Webster ◽  
J. Feller ◽  
T. Whitehead
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Altered Knee Laxity and Stiffness in Response to a Soccer Match Simulation in Players Returning to Sport Within 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110130
Author(s):  
Stefano Nuccio ◽  
Luciana Labanca ◽  
Jacopo Emanuele Rocchi ◽  
Pier Paolo Mariani ◽  
Paola Sbriccoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Soccer Match ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Background: The acute effects of exercise on anterior knee laxity (AKL) and anterior knee stiffness (AKS) have been documented in healthy participants, but only limited evidence has been provided for athletes cleared to return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine if 45 minutes of a soccer match simulation lead to acute changes in AKL and AKS in soccer players returning to sport within 12 months after ACLR. We hypothesized that the reconstructed knee of the ACLR group would exhibit an altered response to sport-specific exercise. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 13 soccer players cleared to return to sport after ACLR and 13 healthy control soccer players matched for age, physical activity level, limb dominance, and anthropometric characteristics were recruited. To assess the effects of a standardized soccer match simulation (Soccer Aerobic Field Test [SAFT45]) on AKL and AKS, an arthrometric evaluation was carried out bilaterally before and immediately after SAFT45. To conduct a comprehensive examination of the force-displacement curve, the absolute and side-to-side difference (SSD) values of both AKL and AKS were extracted at 67, 134, and 200 N. Results: The ACLR and control groups showed similar AKL and AKS at baseline ( P > .05). In response to SAFT45, laxity increased bilaterally at all force levels by 14% to 17% only in the control group ( P < .025). Similarly, AKS at 134 and 200 N decreased in response to SAFT45 only in the control group (10.5% and 20.5%, respectively; P < .025). After SAFT45, the ACLR group had 1.9 and 2.5 times higher SSDs of AKS at 67 and 134 N compared with the control group, respectively ( P < .025), as well as a 1.9 times higher SSD of AKS at 134 N compared with baseline ( P = .014). Conclusion: Soccer players at the time of return to sport after ACLR showed an altered mechanical response to a sport-specific match simulation consisting of bilaterally unchanged AKL and AKS. Clinical Relevance: Soccer players showing altered AKL and AKS in response to exercise after ACLR may not be ready to sustain their preinjury levels of sport, thus potentially increasing the risk of second ACL injuries.

scholarly journals Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantifying Joint Kinematics during Complex High-Speed Tasks through Wearable Sensors

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2331
Author(s):  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Nicola Francesco Lopomo ◽  
Francesco Della Villa ◽  
Gabriele Paolini ◽  
Giulio Figari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Excellent Agreement ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Wearable Sensor ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Full Body

The aim of the present study was to quantify joint kinematics through a wearable sensor system in multidirectional high-speed complex movements used in a protocol for rehabilitation and return to sport assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury, and to validate it against a gold standard optoelectronic marker-based system. Thirty-four healthy athletes were evaluated through a full-body wearable sensor (MTw Awinda, Xsens) and a marker-based optoelectronic (Vicon Nexus, Vicon) system during the execution of three tasks: drop jump, forward sprint, and 90° change of direction. Clinically relevant joint angles of lower limbs and trunk were compared through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and the Coefficient of Multiple Correlation (CMC). An excellent agreement (r > 0.94, CMC > 0.96) was found for knee and hip sagittal plane kinematics in all the movements. A fair-to-excellent agreement was found for frontal (r 0.55–0.96, CMC 0.63–0.96) and transverse (r 0.45–0.84, CMC 0.59–0.90) plane kinematics. Movement complexity slightly affected the agreement between the systems. The system based on wearable sensors showed fair-to-excellent concurrent validity in the evaluation of the specific joint parameters commonly used in rehabilitation and return to sport assessment after ACL injury for complex movements. The ACL professionals could benefit from full-body wearable technology in the on-field rehabilitation of athletes.

Assessing Physical Activity After ACL Injury: Moving Beyond Return to Sport

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110253
Author(s):  
Christopher Kuenze ◽  
Katherine Collins ◽  
Karin Allor Pfeiffer ◽  
Caroline Lisee
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Noncommunicable Diseases ◽  
Successful Recovery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context: Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation. Evidence Acquisition: Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included physical activity OR activity AND anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.

Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Richard N. Puzzitiello ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common traumatic knee injuries experienced by athletes. Return to sport is considered the pinnacle endpoint among patients receiving ACL reconstruction. However, at the time of return to sport, patients may not be participating at their previous levels of function, as defined by clinical metrics. Purpose: To establish when patients perceive maximal subjective medical improvement according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that reported sequential PROMs up to a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Pooled analysis was conducted for PROMs at follow-up points of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinically significant improvement was determined between pairs of intervals with the minimal clinically important difference. Results: This review contains 30 studies including 2253 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was seen up to 1 year after ACL reconstruction, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 to 2 years. Clinically significant improvement in the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm questionnaires was seen up to 6 months postoperatively, but no clinical significance was noted beyond that. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, maximal subjective medical improvement is established 1 year postoperatively, with no further perceived clinical improvement beyond this time point according to current PROMs. The KOOS may be a more responsive metric to subjective improvements in this patient cohort than other patient-reported outcomes, such as the IKDC and Lysholm. Clinical Relevance: After ACL reconstruction, patients perceive interval subjective improvements until 1 year postoperatively.

scholarly journals The hybrid anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique does permit an accelerated early functional recovery and return to sport.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0017
Author(s):  
Peter Annear ◽  
Ebert Jay
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Hamstring Graft ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tegner Score

Objectives: A major reason for undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for patients is to return to high demand activity and sport. Published literature supports a return to sport (RTS) at 6-12 months, though the recovery of lower limb strength and functional symmetry is critical and is linked with a patient’s ability to RTS, as well as reducing the incidence of secondary re-tear. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and RTS between patients undergoing ACLR utilizing a hamstring graft and those undergoing a hybrid technique which augments the hamstring graft with a synthetic LARS ligament. Methods: A non-randomized study design was used to compare clinical outcomes at 10-12 months post-surgery, in 82 patients undergoing conventional ACLR via a hamstring graft (HG) and 35 patients undergoing a hybrid hamstring/LARS graft (HLG). All patients were assessed using a range of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (IKDC, KOOS, Cinncinati, Lysholm, SF-36, Tegner, Noyes, Global Rating of Change – GRC). Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) presenting the operated limb as a percentage of the unaffected limb were calculated for several strength/functional assessments (peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength, the single, triple and triple crossover hop for distance, and the 6 m timed hop). Results: There were no group differences (p>0.05) in patient demographics and the majority of PROs. The HLG group perceived themselves to be significantly ‘more recovered’ (p=0.046) on the GRC scale (HLG = 3.2, HG = 2.2), and also reported a significantly greater (p=0.004) Tegner score (HLG = 7.2, HG = 5.9). For the HG group, 62% of patients had returned to Noyes Level 1 or 2 activities, versus 80% of the HLG group. For the Tegner score, 57% of patients reported a score >6, versus 77% of the HLG group. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in LSIs between groups for the strength and functional hop tests. However, the HLG group demonstrated a mean LSI above 90% for all four hop tests, while all four were below 90% in the HG group. Both groups demonstrated mean hamstring strength LSIs above 90%, while the quadriceps strength LSI was 81.9% and 85.8% for the HG and HLG groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients in the HLG group perceived themselves to be more recovered, and had returned to a higher level of activity/sport, compared with the HG group. While not significant, the HLG group did demonstrate more favorable functional hop and quadriceps strength LSIs, which has been linked with the ability to RTS and the incidence of ACL re-tear. A larger patient cohort and follow-up is required to observe long-term outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document