scholarly journals Reducing high-risk drinking in mandated college students: Evaluation of two personalized normative feedback interventions

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana M. Doumas ◽  
Camille Workman ◽  
Diana Smith ◽  
Anabel Navarro
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore L. Wagener ◽  
Thad R. Leffingwell ◽  
Joe Mignogna ◽  
Melissa R. Mignogna ◽  
Cameron C. Weaver ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 2495-2508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Lewis ◽  
Clayton Neighbors ◽  
Laura Oster-Aaland ◽  
Benjamin S. Kirkeby ◽  
Mary E. Larimer

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 936-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel C. Araujo ◽  
Eugene H. Wong

The present study examined the relationship between high risk drinking and college students' self-perceptions. High risk drinking was defined as the consumption of four or more drinks in a row for women and five or more drinks in a row for men during a single sitting (within the last year). Historical trends regarding college-age drinking indicate that 44% of college students fit the criteria for high risk drinking at least once over the past year. A survey was administered to 210 college students (52 men and 158 women) between 18 and 22 years of age ( M = 20.9, SD = 1.3) to assess their use of alcohol and their self-perceptions. Students' self-perceptions were measured with four subscales from the Neemann-Harter Self-perception Profile for College Students. Students either volunteered to participate in this study outside of class or were solicited during class. It was predicted that students' self-perceptions would differ significantly depending upon their alcohol consumption, i.e., 17.1% were Abstainers, 25.2% were Nonproblem Drinkers, and 57.6% were High Risk Drinkers. Analysis gave significant difference on Global Self-worth between students who abstained and those who were High Risk Drinkers. However, students' perceptions of Scholastic Competence, Intellectual Ability, and Social Acceptance did not differ significantly for the alcohol consumption groups. In addition to high risk drinking, a number of other variables were associated with self-perceptions, such as high school alcohol use, low high school GPA, and students' reported academic involvement. These relations are discussed.


Author(s):  
M. Dolores Cimini ◽  
Matthew P Martens ◽  
Mary E Larimer ◽  
Jason R Kilmer ◽  
Clayton Neighbors ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tavis J. Glassman ◽  
Robert E. Braun

High-risk drinking, the consumption of 5 or more drinks on one occasion, constitutes a serious public health issue among young adults, particularly college students. In an attempt to address this issue in a cost-effective manner, many universities have implemented social marketing interventions sometimes utilizing social norm theory and in other cases using more traditional strategies. However, some practitioners, school officials, and even researchers incorrectly use the terms social marketing and social norms marketing, interchangeably. Social marketing influences health behavior through the use of marketing principles, such as the use of the 4Ps (product, price, placement, and promotion) to increase knowledge, change attitudes, and motivate individual or societal change. Conversely, social norms represents a specific theory which can be applied using social marketing principles. Social norm interventions are designed to correct peoples' misconceptions concerning the prevalence of a particular behavior. Theorists assert that by providing accurate information concerning the prevalence of the behavior of interest people will alter their behavior to fit the“norm.” Using social marketing approaches with or without social norms theory represents a promising cost-effective strategy for addressing high-risk drinking among college students. However, failing to understand and appreciate the conceptual underpinnings of how these two concepts relate to one another may result in ineffective interventions and conclusions concerning the efficacy of social marketing and/or social norms theory.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Chiauzzi ◽  
Traci Craig Green ◽  
Sarah Lord ◽  
Christina Thum ◽  
Marion Goldstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document