Surgical management of chronic high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 2031-2038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Borbas ◽  
James Churchill ◽  
Eugene T. Ek
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 2670-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Maziak ◽  
Laurent Audige ◽  
Carmen Hann ◽  
Marvin Minkus ◽  
Markus Scheibel

Background: Factors influencing the outcome after arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations remain poorly investigated. Purpose: To identify determinants of the radiological outcome and investigate associations between radiological and clinical outcome parameters. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute high-grade AC joint dislocations. The following potential determinants of the radiological outcome were examined using univariable and multivariable regression analyses: timing of surgery, initial AC joint reduction, isolated coracoclavicular (CC) versus combined CC and AC stabilization, ossification of the CC ligaments, age, and overweight status. In addition, associations between radiological (ie, CC difference, dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clinical outcome parameters (Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft score [TS] subjective subcategory, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score [ACJI] pain subitem) were evaluated using univariable analysis. Results: One hundred four patients with a mean (±SD) age of 38.1 ± 11.5 years were included in this study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.9 years. Compared with patients with an overreduced AC joint after surgery, the CC difference was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 1.3-7.3; P = .006) higher in patients with incomplete reduction. Patients with anatomic reduction were 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.2-7.9; P = .017) more likely to develop DPT than those with an overreduced AC joint. An incompletely reduced AC joint was 5.3 times (95% CI, 2.1-13.4; P < .001) more likely to develop DPT versus an overreduced AC joint. Patients who underwent isolated CC stabilization were 4.8 times (95% CI, 1.1-21.0; P = .039) more likely to develop complete DPT than patients with additional AC stabilization. Significantly higher CC difference values were noted for patients who reported pain on the subjective TS ( P = .025). Pain was encountered more commonly in patients with DPT ( PTS = .049; PACJI = .038). Conclusion: Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results. Because of its association with superior radiographic outcomes, consideration should also be given to the use of additional AC cerclage.


Author(s):  
Peter A. Gustafson ◽  
Mark Omwansa ◽  
Andrew G. Geeslin ◽  
Vani J. Sabesan

Finite element models are used for qualitative comparison of the risk of fracture associated with clavicle tunnels in reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments for treatment of high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury. The two-tunnel reconstruction technique is found likely to have higher fracture risk than the less anatomic single tunnel reconstruction. The models suggest that four point bending is more likely than three point bending, cantilever bending, or axial loading to differentiate the reconstruction techniques in a laboratory experiment. The results must be narrowly interpreted only in a laboratory context due to the limitations of the study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Alexandre Lädermann ◽  
Olivia Zbinden ◽  
Sébastien Piotton

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512093927
Author(s):  
Jonas S Nordin ◽  
Felicia Mogianos ◽  
Anders Hauggaard ◽  
Karl Lunsjö

Background Weighted radiographs are performed to classify acromioclavicular joint dislocations; however, the evidence regarding their usefulness is conflicting. Laboratory studies suggest that internal rotation views can replace weighted radiographs, but this has not been clinically evaluated. Purpose To evaluate whether weighted or internal rotation radiographs uncovers more high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations than non-weighted radiographs. Material and Methods A total of 162 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocations were prospectively included. After applying exclusion criteria, 140 remained. Three panorama radiographs, including both coracoclavicular intervals, were completed of each participant: first, a weighted radiograph with 5-kg weights suspended from the wrists; second, a non-weighted radiograph; and third, an internal rotation radiograph. The coracoclavicular intervals were measured by two radiologists independently, and measurements were translated into Rockwood classifications. The classifications and measurements derived from the different radiographic views were compared. Results Weighted radiographs caused no significant changes in classification. For the internal rotation views, there was a significant change in classification for radiologist 2; however, the reason was that more injuries were downgraded compared to the non-weighted views. Relative to the non-weighted radiographs, the mean increase of the coracoclavicular interval on the injured side in the weighted view was 0.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.65) and in the internal rotation view 0.2 mm (95% CI 0.04–0.33). While these changes were statistically significant, they were small and not clinically important. Conclusion This study does not support the use of weighted and internal rotation radiographs in the classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document