scholarly journals Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author(s):  
Kouichi Misaki ◽  
Kazuya Futami ◽  
Takehiro Uno ◽  
Iku Nambu ◽  
Akifumi Yoshikawa ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Annio ◽  
Ryo Torii ◽  
Ben Ariff ◽  
Declan P. O'Regan ◽  
Vivek Muthurangu ◽  
...  

Abstract The analysis of the blood flow in the great thoracic arteries does provide valuable information about the cardiac function and can diagnose the potential development of vascular diseases. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR) is often used to characterize patients' blood flow in the clinical environment. Nevertheless, limited spatial and temporal resolution hinders a detailed assessment of the hemodynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could expand this information and, integrated with experimental velocity field, enable to derive the pressure maps. However, the limited resolution of the 4D flow CMR and the simplifications of CFD modeling compromise the accuracy of the computed flow parameters. In this article, a novel approach is proposed, where 4D flow CMR and CFD velocity fields are integrated synergistically to obtain an enhanced MR imaging (EMRI). The approach was first tested on a two-dimensional (2D) portion of a pipe, to understand the behavior of the parameters of the model in this novel framework, and afterwards in vivo, to apply it to the analysis of blood flow in a patient-specific human aorta. The outcomes of EMRI are assessed by comparing the computed velocities with the experimental one. The results demonstrate that EMRI preserves flow structures while correcting for experimental noise. Therefore, it can provide better insights into the hemodynamics of cardiovascular problems, overcoming the limitations of MRI and CFD, even when considering a small region of interest. EMRI confirmed its potential to provide more accurate noninvasive estimation of major cardiovascular risk predictors (e.g., flow patterns, endothelial shear stress) and become a novel diagnostic tool.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Berg ◽  
Daniel Stucht ◽  
Gábor Janiga ◽  
Oliver Beuing ◽  
Oliver Speck ◽  
...  

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) opens up multiple opportunities to investigate the hemodynamics of the human vascular system. However, due to numerous assumptions the acceptance of CFD among physicians is still limited in practice and validation through comparison is mandatory. Time-dependent quantitative phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging PC-MRI measurements in a healthy volunteer and two intracranial aneurysms were carried out at 3 and 7 Tesla. Based on the acquired images, three-dimensional (3D) models of the aneurysms were reconstructed and used for the numerical simulations. Flow information from the MR measurements were applied as boundary conditions. The four-dimensional (4D) velocity fields obtained by CFD and MRI were qualitatively as well as quantitatively compared including cut planes and vector analyses. For all cases a high similarity of the velocity patterns was observed. Additionally, the quantitative analysis revealed a good agreement between CFD and MRI. Deviations were caused by minor differences between the reconstructed vessel models and the actual lumen. The comparisons between diastole and systole indicate that relative differences between MRI and CFD are intensified with increasing velocity. The findings of this study lead to the conclusion that CFD and MRI agree well in predicting intracranial velocities when realistic geometries and boundary conditions are provided. Due to the considerably higher temporal and spatial resolution of CFD compared to MRI, complex flow patterns can be further investigated in order to evaluate their role with respect to aneurysm formation or rupture. Nevertheless, special care is required regarding the vessel reconstruction since the geometry has a major impact on the subsequent numerical results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document