Effects of New 1-Step Posterior Reconstruction Method on Recovery of Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective, Single-Blind, Parallel Group, Randomized, Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (3) ◽  
pp. 935-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Wook Jeong ◽  
Jung Keun Lee ◽  
Jong Jin Oh ◽  
Sangchul Lee ◽  
Seong Jin Jeong ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen B. Williams ◽  
Mehrdad Alemozaffar ◽  
Yin Lei ◽  
Nathanael Hevelone ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1331-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqui H Morris ◽  
Alexandra John ◽  
Lucy Wedderburn ◽  
Petra Rauchhaus ◽  
Peter T Donnan

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of dynamic Lycra® orthoses as an adjunct to arm rehabilitation after stroke and to explore the magnitude and direction of change on arm outcomes. Design: This is a single-blind, two-arm parallel group, feasibility randomized controlled trial. Setting: In-patient rehabilitation. Subjects: The study participants were stroke survivors with arm hemiparesis two to four weeks after stroke receiving in-patient rehabilitation. Interventions: Participants were randomized 2:1 to wear Lycra® gauntlets for eight hours daily for eight weeks, plus usual rehabilitation ( n = 27), or to usual rehabilitation only ( n = 16). Main measures: Recruitment, retention, fidelity, adverse events and completeness of data collection were examined at 8 and 16 weeks; arm function (activity limitation; Action Research Arm Test, Motor Activity Log) and impairment (Nine-hole Peg Test, Motricity Index, Modified Tardieu Scale). Structured interviews explored acceptability. Results: Of the target of 51, 43 (84%) participants were recruited. Retention at 8 weeks was 32 (79%) and 24 (56%) at 16 weeks. In total, 11 (52%) intervention group participants and 6 (50%) control group participants (odds ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.2 to 7.8) had improved Action Research Arm Test level by 8 weeks; at 16 weeks, this was 8 (61%) intervention and 6 (75.0%) control participants (odds ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 0.1 to 13.1). Change on other measures favoured control participants. Acceptability was influenced by 26 adverse reactions. Conclusion: Recruitment and retention were low, and adverse reactions were problematic. There were no indications of clinically relevant effects, but the small sample means definitive conclusions cannot be made. A definitive trial is not warranted without orthoses adaptation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document