V6-09 TRAINING IN A NOVEL FLUOROSCOPY SIMULATOR (IPERC) REDUCES EMULATED RADIATION TIME ASSOCIATED TO PUNCTURE AND IMPROVES KIDNEY ACCESS TIME IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY SIMULATION AMONG UROLOGISTS WITH SCARCE SURGICAL EXPERIENCE

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ramón Torres Anguiano ◽  
Efraín Maldonado Alcaraz ◽  
Jorge Moreno Palacios ◽  
Guillermo Montoya Martínez ◽  
Virgilio Augusto López Sámano ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Ganesh Bhakta Acharya ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Hari Bahadur KC ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Aravind Kumar Shah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Dilation of the track can be achieved by multiple incremental flexible Amplatz type, Alken metal telescoping dilators, or balloon in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Balloon dilator is the most expensive method. Both of the incremental dilation techniques are more time consuming with higher failure rates. Hence, a prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of “single shot” dilation of the nephrostomy tract by amplatz dilator with serial alken metallic telescopic dilation technique in PCNL. Methods: Of the 138 renal stone patients who underwent PCNL from January 2015 to December 2015, 100 patients were randomized into two groups. Serial tract dilation with alken metallic dilators was used in group A (n=50), and one shot dilation technique in Group B (n=50). The access tract dilation time, success rate, blood loss and complications were evaluated. Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of mean age, location and size (largest diameter) of the stone (p>0.05). No difference was observed in the procedural success rate between groups A and B (96% v 94% respectively, p=0.64). Mean access time was similar in both groups (5.89+2.67 vs 4.98+2.0 mins, p=0.06). Complications between the groups were not significantly different. There were 6 patients with previous open stone surgery in both the groups. Previous open stone surgery did not impact procedural success rate, access time and complications in both groups. Conclusion: One-shot dilation technique is equally as effective, safe and well tolerated as metal telescopic dilation techniques even in patients with history of ipsilateral open stone surgery.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro L. Rodrigues ◽  
António H. J. Moreira ◽  
Nuno F. Rodrigues ◽  
A. C. M. Pinho ◽  
Jaime C. Fonseca ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhamshid Okhunov ◽  
Vincent Bird ◽  
Arash Akhavein ◽  
Daniel Moreira ◽  
Arvin George ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-159
Author(s):  
Somboon Phaijitwichian ◽  

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, access tract dilation time and fluoroscopic time between the one-shot dilation technique and telescopic metal dilatation technique in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Nakornping Hospital. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2020 to July 2021 were included in the study and they were randomly divided into two groups. In group 1 (32 patients), telescopic metal dilation was used, in group 2 (33 patients), the one-shot technique was used. Success rates of dilation, access tract dilation time and fluoroscopic time were evaluated. Results: The success rate of dilation was 100% in both groups. The access tract dilation time was 835.63 ± 309.68 seconds in group 1 and 569.42 ± 314.75 seconds in group 2 (p = 0.001). The fluoroscopic time was 48.16 ± 22.16 seconds in group 1 and 41.97 ± 23.99 seconds in group 2 (p = 0.29). The access tract dilation time of the one-shot dilation technique was statistically significantly shorter than that in the telescopic metal dilatation group. The mean fluoroscopic time of the one- shot dilation technique was shorter than in telescopic metal dilatation but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: One-shot dilation technique is as effective as telescopic metal dilatation, with a significant reduction in access tract dilation time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Alexandru Iordache ◽  
Catalin Baston ◽  
Guler-Margaritis Silviu-Stelian ◽  
Emil Angelescu ◽  
Vasile Cerempei ◽  
...  

Nowadays percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for renal staghorn calculus or large (>20 mm) pelvic or caliceal stones, as well as for the failure of other treatment options. This review aims to evaluate the contemporary use of ultrasound imaging in PCNL, by comparing it to conventional fluoroscopy, reviewing data regarding the complication and success rate of nephrostomy tract creation and stone free rate (SFR), as well as data concerning the learning curve for these procedures and cost indicators. The evidence acquired shows that the ultrasound guided access (USGA) is a comparable method with the classic fluoroscopic guided access (FGA), with a similar safety profile, with a significant reduction in radiation exposure, up to radiation free complete PCNL. USGA PCNL seems to lead to decreased bleeding and need for transfusion, especially when the Doppler mode is used, and also to a slightly higher SFR than conventional FGA PCNL. USGA PCNL reduces the overall costs of the procedure by about 30% and can be safely learnt and performed by urologists. For an experienced endourologist, familiar withFGA PCNL, the learning curve for shifting to USGA PCNL is of approximately 20 procedures. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-117
Author(s):  
Abdul Matin Anamur Rashid Choudhury ◽  
Tohid Mohammad Saiful Hossain ◽  
Tasmina Parveen

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of one-shot dilation (OSD) in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: This is a prospective, single -center study conducted between January 2017 to June 2019. Patients who underwent PCNL using one shot dilatation (21 – 24 Fr) for access in PCNL were included in the study. Access time, fluoroscopy time, successful dilation time, stone free rate, decrease hemoglobin level and transfusion rate, complication rate, length of post operative hospital stay, cost were recorded. Data was analyzed and reported using summary statistics. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in this survey. 30 patients in one shot dilation (OSD) group.The mean age was 39.5 years. Control group of 30 patients were included in standard PCNL procedure where method of tract dilation was done by regid Amplatz dilators. Access time and fluoroscopy time in OSD group was approximately shorter. Statistically it was significant. Successful dilation and stone free rate were subsequently 98% and was significant. Data collected included patient access time, radiation exposure, total operating time, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, tract dilatation failures, complications and transfusions. Conclusion: The use of one shot and standard prone position under general anaesthesia combines the advantages of these both methods including less radiation exposure and shorter access and operative time. One shot dilation technique is safe, economical and feasible technique with added advantage,lesser radiation exposure and lesser chance of blood transfusion. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 2, July 2020 p.114-117


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
Amy E. Krambeck ◽  
Andrew J. LeRoy ◽  
Audrey L. Rohlinger ◽  
David E. Patterson ◽  
Matthew T. Gettman

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Xun Li ◽  
Guohua Zeng ◽  
Jian Yuan ◽  
Chichang Shan ◽  
Kaijun Wu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document