scholarly journals MP76-18 NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING ALLOWS FOR ACCURATE AND AUTOMATED EXTRACTION OF DATA FROM PROSTATE BIOPSY PATHOLOGY REPORTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Joice ◽  
Brant Chee ◽  
Natasha Gupta ◽  
Michael Johnson
2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander P. Glaser ◽  
Brian J. Jordan ◽  
Jason Cohen ◽  
Anuj Desai ◽  
Philip Silberman ◽  
...  

Purpose Bladder cancer is initially diagnosed and staged with a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Patient survival is dependent on appropriate sampling of layers of the bladder, but pathology reports are dictated as free text, making large-scale data extraction for quality improvement challenging. We sought to automate extraction of stage, grade, and quality information from TURBT pathology reports using natural language processing (NLP). Methods Patients undergoing TURBT were retrospectively identified using the Northwestern Enterprise Data Warehouse. An NLP algorithm was then created to extract information from free-text pathology reports and was iteratively improved using a training set of manually reviewed TURBTs. NLP accuracy was then validated using another set of manually reviewed TURBTs, and reliability was calculated using Cohen’s κ. Results Of 3,042 TURBTs identified from 2006 to 2016, 39% were classified as benign, 35% as Ta, 11% as T1, 4% as T2, and 10% as isolated carcinoma in situ. Of 500 randomly selected manually reviewed TURBTs, NLP correctly staged 88% of specimens (κ = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86). Of 272 manually reviewed T1 tumors, NLP correctly categorized grade in 100% of tumors (κ = 1), correctly categorized if muscularis propria was reported by the pathologist in 98% of tumors (κ = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99), and correctly categorized if muscularis propria was present or absent in the resection specimen in 82% of tumors (κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.73). Discrepancy analysis revealed pathologist notes and deeper resection specimens as frequent reasons for NLP misclassifications. Conclusion We developed an NLP algorithm that demonstrates a high degree of reliability in extracting stage, grade, and presence of muscularis propria from TURBT pathology reports. Future iterations can continue to improve performance, but automated extraction of oncologic information is promising in improving quality and assisting physicians in delivery of care.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Oliwa ◽  
Steven B. Maron ◽  
Leah M. Chase ◽  
Samantha Lomnicki ◽  
Daniel V.T. Catenacci ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Robust institutional tumor banks depend on continuous sample curation or else subsequent biopsy or resection specimens are overlooked after initial enrollment. Curation automation is hindered by semistructured free-text clinical pathology notes, which complicate data abstraction. Our motivation is to develop a natural language processing method that dynamically identifies existing pathology specimen elements necessary for locating specimens for future use in a manner that can be re-implemented by other institutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pathology reports from patients with gastroesophageal cancer enrolled in The University of Chicago GI oncology tumor bank were used to train and validate a novel composite natural language processing-based pipeline with a supervised machine learning classification step to separate notes into internal (primary review) and external (consultation) reports; a named-entity recognition step to obtain label (accession number), location, date, and sublabels (block identifiers); and a results proofreading step. RESULTS We analyzed 188 pathology reports, including 82 internal reports and 106 external consult reports, and successfully extracted named entities grouped as sample information (label, date, location). Our approach identified up to 24 additional unique samples in external consult notes that could have been overlooked. Our classification model obtained 100% accuracy on the basis of 10-fold cross-validation. Precision, recall, and F1 for class-specific named-entity recognition models show strong performance. CONCLUSION Through a combination of natural language processing and machine learning, we devised a re-implementable and automated approach that can accurately extract specimen attributes from semistructured pathology notes to dynamically populate a tumor registry.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos R Oliveira ◽  
Patrick Niccolai ◽  
Anette Michelle Ortiz ◽  
Sangini S Sheth ◽  
Eugene D Shapiro ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Accurate identification of new diagnoses of human papillomavirus–associated cancers and precancers is an important step toward the development of strategies that optimize the use of human papillomavirus vaccines. The diagnosis of human papillomavirus cancers hinges on a histopathologic report, which is typically stored in electronic medical records as free-form, or unstructured, narrative text. Previous efforts to perform surveillance for human papillomavirus cancers have relied on the manual review of pathology reports to extract diagnostic information, a process that is both labor- and resource-intensive. Natural language processing can be used to automate the structuring and extraction of clinical data from unstructured narrative text in medical records and may provide a practical and effective method for identifying patients with vaccine-preventable human papillomavirus disease for surveillance and research. OBJECTIVE This study's objective was to develop and assess the accuracy of a natural language processing algorithm for the identification of individuals with cancer or precancer of the cervix and anus. METHODS A pipeline-based natural language processing algorithm was developed, which incorporated machine learning and rule-based methods to extract diagnostic elements from the narrative pathology reports. To test the algorithm’s classification accuracy, we used a split-validation study design. Full-length cervical and anal pathology reports were randomly selected from 4 clinical pathology laboratories. Two study team members, blinded to the classifications produced by the natural language processing algorithm, manually and independently reviewed all reports and classified them at the document level according to 2 domains (diagnosis and human papillomavirus testing results). Using the manual review as the gold standard, the algorithm’s performance was evaluated using standard measurements of accuracy, recall, precision, and F-measure. RESULTS The natural language processing algorithm’s performance was validated on 949 pathology reports. The algorithm demonstrated accurate identification of abnormal cytology, histology, and positive human papillomavirus tests with accuracies greater than 0.91. Precision was lowest for anal histology reports (0.87, 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and highest for cervical cytology (0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.99). The natural language processing algorithm missed 2 out of the 15 abnormal anal histology reports, which led to a relatively low recall (0.68, 95% CI 0.43-0.87). CONCLUSIONS This study outlines the development and validation of a freely available and easily implementable natural language processing algorithm that can automate the extraction and classification of clinical data from cervical and anal cytology and histology.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
KevinS Hughes ◽  
JullietteM Buckley ◽  
SuzanneB Coopey ◽  
John Sharko ◽  
Fernanda Polubriaginof ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Imler ◽  
Justin Morea ◽  
Charles Kahi ◽  
Thomas F. Imperiale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document