scholarly journals Market Access and Reimbursement: The Increasing Role of Real-World Evidence

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. A450-A451 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pietri ◽  
P. Masoura
Author(s):  
Denis Horgan ◽  
Gennaro CILIBERTO ◽  
Pierfranco Conte ◽  
Giuseppe CURIGLIANO ◽  
Luis Seijo ◽  
...  

Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by take-up in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. The potential that genomics has brought to biomarker testing in diagnosis, prediction and research is being realised, pre-eminently in many cancers, but also in an ever-wider range of conditions. One of the paradigmatic examples is BRCA1/2 testing in ovarian, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancers. Nevertheless, development is impeded by data deficiencies, and lack of policy alignment on standards, approval – and the role of real-world evidence in the process - and reimbursement. The acute nature of the problem is compellingly illustrated by the particular challenges facing the development and use of tumour agnostic therapies, where the gaps in preparedness for taking advantage of this innovative approach to cancer therapy are sharply exposed. Europe should already have in place a guarantee of universal access to a minimum suite of biomarker tests and should be planning for an optimum testing scenario with a wider range of biomarker tests integrated into a more sophisticated health system articulated around personalised medicine. Improving healthcare and winning advantages for Europe's industrial competitiveness and innovation require an appropriate policy framework – starting with an update to outdated recommendations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Klonoff

Real-world evidence (RWE) is the clinical evidence about benefits or risks of medical products derived from analyzing real world data (RWD), which are data collected through routine clinical practice. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of RWE studies, how these studies differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), how to overcome barriers to current skepticism about RWE, how FDA is using RWE, how to improve the quality of RWE, and finally the future of RWE trials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18515-e18515
Author(s):  
Melissa Stahl ◽  
Alissa M Winzeler ◽  
Ali Zaman ◽  
Nicole Shelby ◽  
James Lin Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (S2) ◽  
pp. 33-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamlesh Khunti ◽  
Mohamed Hassanein ◽  
Moon-Kyu Lee ◽  
Viswanathan Mohan ◽  
Aslam Amod

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Batra ◽  
W. Y. Cheung

The term “real-world evidence” (rwe) describes the analysis of data that are collected beyond the context of clinical trials. The use and application of rwe have become increasingly common and relevant, especially in oncology, because there is growing recognition that randomized controlled trials (rcts) might not be sufficiently representative of the entire patient population that is affected by cancer, and that specific clinical research questions might be best addressed by real-world data. In this brief review, our main aim is to highlight the role of rwe in informing cancer care, particularly focusing on specific examples from colorectal cancer. Our hope is to illustrate the ways in which rwe can complement rcts in improving the understanding of cancer management and how rwe can facilitate cancer treatment decisions for real-world patients encountered in routine clinical care.


Allergy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Paoletti ◽  
Danilo DiBona ◽  
Derek K. Chu ◽  
Davide Firinu ◽  
Enrico Heffler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document