scholarly journals Feasibility, Reliability and Validity of The Decision Tool Unipolar Depression (DTUD) In Identifying Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Need of Highly Specialized Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A529 ◽  
Author(s):  
FC van Krugten ◽  
M Kaddouri ◽  
M Goorden ◽  
AJ van Balkom ◽  
HG Ruhé ◽  
...  
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman

During the past two decades, a number of studies have found that depressed patients frequently have manic symptoms intermixed with depressive symptoms. While the frequency of mixed syndromes are more common in bipolar than in unipolar depressives, mixed states are also common in patients with major depressive disorder. The admixture of symptoms may be evident when depressed patients present for treatment, or they may emerge during ongoing treatment. In some patients, treatment with antidepressant medication might precipitate the emergence of mixed states. It would therefore be useful to systematically inquire into the presence of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depressed patients. We can anticipate that increased attention will likely be given to mixed depression because of changes in the DSM–5. In the present article, I review instruments that have been utilized to assess the presence and severity of manic symptoms and therefore could be potentially used to identify the DSM–5 mixed-features specifier in depressed patients and to evaluate the course and outcome of treatment. In choosing which measure to use, clinicians and researchers should consider whether the measure assesses both depression and mania/hypomania, assesses all or only some of the DSM–5 criteria for the mixed-features specifier, or assesses manic/hypomanic symptoms that are not part of the DSM–5 definition. Feasibility, more so than reliability and validity, will likely determine whether these measures are incorporated into routine clinical practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Ratzke ◽  
Doris Hupfeld Moreno ◽  
Clarice Gorenstein ◽  
Ricardo Alberto Moreno

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate the Structured Clinical Interview for Mood Spectrum into Brazilian Portuguese, measuring its reliability, validity, and defining scores for bipolar disorders. METHOD: Questionnaire was translated (into Brazilian Portuguese) and back-translated into English. Sample consisted of 47 subjects with bipolar disorder, 47 with major depressive disorder, 18 with schizophrenia and 22 controls. Inter-rater reliability was tested in 20 subjects with bipolar disorder and MDD. Internal consistency was measured using the Kuder Richardson formula. Forward stepwise discriminant analysis was performed. Scores were compared between groups; manic (M), depressive (D) and total (T) threshold scores were calculated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Kuder Richardson coefficients were between 0.86 and 0.94. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 (CI 95 % 0.93-0.97). Subjects with bipolar disorder had higher M and T, and similar D scores, when compared to major depressive disorder (ANOVA, p < 0.001). The sub-domains that best discriminated unipolar and bipolar subjects were manic energy and manic mood. M had the best area under the curve (0.909), and values of M equal to or greater than 30 yielded 91.5% sensitivity and 74.5% specificity. CONCLUSION: Structured Clinical Interview for Mood Spectrum has good reliability and validity. Cut-off of 30 best differentiates subjects with bipolar disorder vs. unipolar depression. A cutoff score of 30 or higher in the mania sub-domain is appropriate to help make a distinction between subjects with bipolar disorder and those with unipolar depression.


2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (08) ◽  
pp. 1080-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajjad A. Khan ◽  
Dennis A. Revicki ◽  
Mariam Hassan ◽  
Julie C. Locklear ◽  
Lisa Aronson Friedman ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0171659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédérique C. W. van Krugten ◽  
Meriam Kaddouri ◽  
Maartje Goorden ◽  
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom ◽  
Claudi L. H. Bockting ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 192 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liz Forty ◽  
Daniel Smith ◽  
Lisa Jones ◽  
Ian Jones ◽  
Sian Caesar ◽  
...  

SummaryIt is commonly – but wrongly – assumed that there are no important differences between the clinical presentations of major depressive disorder and bipolar depression. Here we compare clinical course variables and depressive symptom profiles in a large sample of individuals with major depressive disorder (n=593) and bipolar disorder (n=443). Clinical characteristics associated with a bipolar course included the presence of psychosis, diurnal mood variation and hypersomnia during depressive episodes, and a greater number of shorter depressive episodes. Such features should alert a clinician to a possible bipolar course. This is important because optimal management is not the same for bipolar and unipolar depression.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. C. W. van Krugten ◽  
M. Goorden ◽  
A. J. L. M. van Balkom ◽  
J. Spijker ◽  
W. B. F. Brouwer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Lu ◽  
Yingtan Wang ◽  
Guanglei Xun

Abstract Background: At present, no well-established biomarkers were ever found to distinguish unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar disorder (BD). This study aimed to provide a clearer comparison of UA levels between BD and major depressive disorder. Methods: Peripheral UA of 119 patients with BD in acute stage (AS) and 77 in remission stage (RS), and 95 patients with UD in AS and 61 in RS were measured, so were 180 healthy controls. Results: UA levels in BD group were higher than UD and HC groups regardless of the AS or RS, while differences in UA levels between UD group and HC group were not significant. Differences in UA levels of BD-M (bipolar mania/hypomania) were higher than BD-D (bipolar depression) subgroups, and UA levels of BD-M and BD-D subgroups were higher than UD and HC groups. The comparison of number of participants with hyperuricemia among groups confirmed the above results. There were no significant differences in UA levels of between drug-use and drug-free/naïve subgroups. Conclusion: The study suggests patients with BD had a higher level of UA than UD, especially in mania episode.


2012 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Ta Li ◽  
Ya-Mei Bai ◽  
Yu-Lin Huang ◽  
Ying-Sheue Chen ◽  
Tzeng-Ji Chen ◽  
...  

BackgroundPeople with major depressive disorder who fail to respond to adequate trials of antidepressant treatment may harbour hidden bipolar disorder.AimsWe aimed to compare the rates of a change in diagnosis to bipolar disorder among people with major depressive disorder with stratified responses to antidepressants during an 8-year follow-up period.MethodInformation on individuals with major depressive disorder identified during 2000 (cohort 2000, n = 1485) and 2003 (cohort 2003, n = 2459) were collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1 000 000 health service users in Taiwan. Participants responding well to antidepressants were compared with those showing poor responses to adequate trials of antidepressants.ResultsIn 7.6–12.1% of those with a diagnosis of unipolar major depressive disorder this diagnosis was subsequently changed to bipolar disorder, with a mean time to change of 1.89–2.98 years. Difficult-to-treat participants presented higher rates of change to a bipolar diagnosis (25.6% in cohort 2000; 26.6% in cohort 2003) than easy-to-treat participants (8.8–8.9% in cohort 2000; 6.8–8.6% in cohort 2003; P<0.0001). Regression analysis showed that the variable most strongly associated with the change in diagnosis was antidepressant use history. The difficult-to-treat participants were associated most with diagnostic changing (cohort 2000: odds ratio (OR) = 1.88 (95% CI 1.12–3.16); cohort 2003: OR = 4.94 (95% CI 2.81–8.68)).ConclusionsThis is the first large-scale study to report an association between antidepressant response history and subsequent change in diagnosis from major depressive disorder to bipolar disorder. Our findings support the view that a history of poor response to antidepressants in unipolar depression could be a useful predictor for bipolar diathesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document