scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Theophylline use as Add-On Therapy In Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. A640
Author(s):  
P Wilairat ◽  
K Kengkla ◽  
C Thayawiwat ◽  
P Phlaisaithong ◽  
S Sombunmee ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Linjie Li ◽  
Wei Yao ◽  
Xing Wang ◽  
Liyuan Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with several complications and mortality in acutely ill patients. For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), the association between COPD and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed consecutive aSAH patients admitted to the West China Hospital between 2009 and 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI. The primary outcome was in hospital mortality.Results: Using a ten-year clinical database from a large university medical center, 5643 patients with aSAH were identified, of whom 377 (7.9%) also had COPD. After matching, 289 patients were included in COPD group and 1156 in non-COPD groups. COPD was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.62) and poor functional outcome at discharge (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.80). Similarly, patients with COPD had significantly longer length of hospital stay, higher odds of seizure (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.04-4.04), pneumonia (OR 3.10, 95% CI 2.38-4.04), intracranial infection (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.14-2.29), urinary tract infection (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.20) and bloodstream infection(OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.74-6.15). Conclusions: Among aSAH patients, COPD is associated with increased mortality. COPD represents a significant risk factor for pneumonia and seizure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 147997311881569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preyanate Wilairat ◽  
Kirati Kengkla ◽  
Chaiyawat Thayawiwat ◽  
Phongsathorn Phlaisaithong ◽  
Supakorn Somboonmee ◽  
...  

To examine clinical outcomes of theophylline use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA). Electronic data from five hospitals located in Northern Thailand between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively collected. Propensity score (PS) matching (2:1 ratio) technique was used to minimize confounding factors. The primary outcome was overall exacerbations. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation not leading to hospital admission, hospitalization for exacerbation, hospitalization for pneumonia, and all-cause hospitalizations. Cox’s proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). After PS matching, of 711 patients with COPD (mean age: 70.1 years; 74.4% male; 60.8% severe airflow obstruction), 474 theophylline users and 237 non-theophylline users were included. Mean follow-up time was 2.26 years. Theophylline significantly increased the risk of overall exacerbation (aHR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.11–1.96; p = 0.008) and exacerbation not leading to hospital admission (aHR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.06–2.03; p = 0.020). Theophylline use did not significantly increase the risk of hospitalization for exacerbation (aHR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.79–1.58; p = 0.548), hospitalization for pneumonia (aHR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.89–1.84; p = 0.185), and all-cause hospitalizations (aHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80–1.33; p = 0.795). Theophylline use as add-on therapy to ICS and LABA might be associated with an increased risk for overall exacerbation in patients with COPD. A large-scale prospective study of theophylline use investigating both safety and efficacy is warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanan Cui ◽  
Zijie Zhan ◽  
Zihang Zeng ◽  
Ke Huang ◽  
Chen Liang ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Elevated eosinophils in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are recognized as a biomarker to guide inhaled corticosteroids use, but the value of blood eosinophils in hospitalized exacerbations of COPD remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of eosinophils in predicting clinical outcomes in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).Methods: We analyzed data from the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inpatient registry (ACURE) study, which is an ongoing nationwide multicenter, observational real-world study in patients admitted for AECOPD. Data collected between January 2018 and December 2019 in 163 centers were first reviewed. The eligible patients were divided into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups, according to blood eosinophil with 2% of the total leukocyte count as the threshold. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to adjust for confounders.Results: A total of 1,566 patients (median age: 69 years; 80.3% male) were included and 42.7% had an eosinophilic AECOPD. Eosinophil count <2% was associated with the development of respiratory failure and pneumonia. After PS matching, 650 pairs in overall patients, 468 pairs in patients with smoking history and 177 pairs in patients without smoking were selected, respectively. Only in patients with smoking history, the non-eosinophilic AECOPD was associated with longer median hospital stays (9 vs. 8 days, P = 0.034), higher dosage of corticosteroid use, higher economic burden of hospitalization, and poorer response to corticosteroid therapy compared to the eosinophilic AECOPD. No significant difference was found in patients without smoking. Eosinophil levels had no relationship with the change of COPD Assessment Test scores and readmissions or death after 30 days.Conclusion: Elevated eosinophils were associated with better short-term outcomes only in patients with a smoking history. Eosinophil levels cannot be confidently used as a predictor alone for estimating prognosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsiang Liao ◽  
Liang-Yu Chen ◽  
Kuang-Ming Liao ◽  
Chung-Yu Chen

Purpose: Many comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, and insomnia, occur in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These patients may be prescribed benzodiazepines (BZDs). However, there are some concerns that benzodiazepines increase the risk of drug overdose, hypercapnic respiratory failure, acute exacerbation and increased mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the drug safety of BZDs in patients with COPD.Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Research database in Taiwan from 2002 to 2016 to perform a retrospective cohort study. We enrolled patients who were exposed to the first prescription of BZDs, non-BZDs or a combination (mix user) after COPD diagnosis. We performed 1:1:1 propensity score matching in three groups. The outcomes were COPD with acute exacerbation and all-cause mortality. Poisson regression analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence rate ratios for the outcomes in the groups.Results: After propensity score matching, there were 2,856 patients in each group. After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that compared to BZD users, non-BZD and mix users had nonsignificant differences in outpatient management of acute exacerbations, hospitalization management of acute exacerbations, emergency department management of acute exacerbations and all-cause mortality. BZD and mix groups showed significantly increased admission for acute exacerbation of COPD compared with that of the nonuser group, with IRRs of 2.52 (95% CI, 1.52–4.18; p = 0.0004) and 2.63 (95% CI, 1.57–4.40; p = 0.0002), respectively.Conclusion: BZD, non-BZD, and mix users showed increased COPD-related respiratory events compared to nonusers in Asian subjects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsiang Liao ◽  
Liang-Yu Chen ◽  
Kuang-Ming Liao ◽  
Chung-Yu Chen

Abstract Many comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, dyspnea, and insomnia, occur in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These patients may be prescribed benzodiazepines (BZDs). However, there are some concerns that benzodiazepines increase the risk of drug overdose, hypercapnic respiratory failure, acute exacerbation and increased mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the drug safety of BZDs in patients with COPD. We used the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan from 2002 to 2016 to perform a retrospective cohort study. We enrolled patients who were exposed to the first prescription of BZDs, non-BZDs or a combination (mix user) after COPD diagnosis. We performed 1:1:1:1 propensity score matching in three groups. The outcomes were COPD with acute exacerbation and all-cause mortality. Poisson regression analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the outcomes in the groups. After propensity score matching, there were 2856 patients in each group. After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that compared to BZD users, non-BZD and mix users had nonsignificant differences in outpatient management of acute exacerbations, hospitalization management of acute exacerbations, emergency department management of acute exacerbations and all-cause mortality. Using BZDs or non-BZDs is safe in terms of COPD exacerbation. However, BZD, non-BZD, and mix users showed increased COPD-related respiratory events compared to nonusers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document