Journal of Vocational Behavior's 50th anniversary: Looking back and going forward

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 103540
Author(s):  
Mark L. Savickas

scholarly journals Home > All Content > Vol 47, No 2A (2016) States, Markets and Society – New Relationships for a New Development Era Cover Page Edited by: Melissa Leach December 2016 Volume 47 Issue 2A ‘How does change happen?’ and ‘How should change happen and how can it be enabled?’ are key questions analysed in this IDS Bulletin, drawing on the Institute of Development Studies’ reflections on States, Markets and Society as a theme of its 50th Anniversary year. The year generally, and this Bulletin issue specifically, looks back in order to look forward to future challenges and how to meet them. While the first part of this IDS Bulletin draws on a selection of archive articles to highlight key debates over the decades, the second part looks forward by drawing on contributions to IDS’ 50th Anniversary conference, which took place in July 2016. The roles and relationships of the public and private sectors and civil society have been central themes in analysis and action around the social, economic and political change that constitutes development. However, articles in this issue suggest that over-dominance of market forces over government, business and civil society accounts for many of today’s development challenges, and suggest a rebalancing of the current States–Markets–Society triad to give greater weight and influence to state and societal forces to those of the market. An agenda is also considered for new alliances and relationships, suggesting that cross-cutting themes and inter- and transdisciplinary approaches will be required – by international partnerships – to integrate high quality research with the knowledge of people working in state, business and civil society organisations, mobilising evidence for impact. In such ways, this IDS Bulletin charts some contours of a future map of development studies, in a new era. SUBSCRIBE FOR PRINT States, Markets and Society – Looking Back to Look Forward New Relationships for a New Development Era Melissa Leach ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Introduction: States, Markets and Society – Looking Back to Look Forward Melissa Leach DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.175 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Politics, Class and Development (Editorial) Robin Luckham DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.176 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE The Retreat of the State (Editorial) John Dearlove, Gordon White DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.177 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Alternatives in the Restructuring of State-Society Relations: Research Issues for Tropical Africa David Booth DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.178 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Towards a Political Analysis of Markets Gordon White DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.179 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Strengthening Civil Society in Africa: The Role of Foreign Political Aid Mark Robinson DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.180 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE No Path to Power: Civil Society, State Services, and the Poverty of City Women Hania Sholkamy DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.181 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE States or Markets – Twenty-five Years On Christopher Colclough DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.182 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Inequality and Exclusion in the New Era of Capital Violet Barasa DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.183 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Inclusive Innovation, Development and Policy: Four Key Themes Amrita Saha DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.184 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Consequences of Inequality for Sustainability Sunita Narain DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.185 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Accelerating Sustainability: The Variations of State, Market and Society Dynamics in Diverse Contexts

IDS Bulletin ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2A) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy Lofty Hannah

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hennessy ◽  
Manolis Mavrikis ◽  
Carina Girvan ◽  
Sara Price ◽  
Niall Winters

Author(s):  
Brad A. Meisner

Abstract This article contains excerpts from the opening and closing remarks delivered at CAG2021 – the Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology (CAG) – which was hosted virtually from October 21 to 23, 2021. This event commemorated CAG’s 50th anniversary and included 645 delegates from across Canada and the world. The conference theme, “Hindsight 20/20: Looking Back for a Vision Forward in Gerontology,” focused on the burgeoning gerontological work that examines the various and complex ways that COVID-19 has affected older people and aging, as well as the need to develop a stronger emphasis on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion in the field of gerontology.


Author(s):  
R. D. Heidenreich

This program has been organized by the EMSA to commensurate the 50th anniversary of the experimental verification of the wave nature of the electron. Davisson and Germer in the U.S. and Thomson and Reid in Britian accomplished this at about the same time. Their findings were published in Nature in 1927 by mutual agreement since their independent efforts had led to the same conclusion at about the same time. In 1937 Davisson and Thomson shared the Nobel Prize in physics for demonstrating the wave nature of the electron deduced in 1924 by Louis de Broglie.The Davisson experiments (1921-1927) were concerned with the angular distribution of secondary electron emission from nickel surfaces produced by 150 volt primary electrons. The motivation was the effect of secondary emission on the characteristics of vacuum tubes but significant deviations from the results expected for a corpuscular electron led to a diffraction interpretation suggested by Elasser in 1925.


Author(s):  
W.M. Stobbs

I do not have access to the abstracts of the first meeting of EMSA but at this, the 50th Anniversary meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, I have an excuse to consider the historical origins of the approaches we take to the use of electron microscopy for the characterisation of materials. I have myself been actively involved in the use of TEM for the characterisation of heterogeneities for little more than half of that period. My own view is that it was between the 3rd International Meeting at London, and the 1956 Stockholm meeting, the first of the European series , that the foundations of the approaches we now take to the characterisation of a material using the TEM were laid down. (This was 10 years before I took dynamical theory to be etched in stone.) It was at the 1956 meeting that Menter showed lattice resolution images of sodium faujasite and Hirsch, Home and Whelan showed images of dislocations in the XlVth session on “metallography and other industrial applications”. I have always incidentally been delighted by the way the latter authors misinterpreted astonishingly clear thickness fringes in a beaten (”) foil of Al as being contrast due to “large strains”, an error which they corrected with admirable rapidity as the theory developed. At the London meeting the research described covered a broad range of approaches, including many that are only now being rediscovered as worth further effort: however such is the power of “the image” to persuade that the above two papers set trends which influence, perhaps too strongly, the approaches we take now. Menter was clear that the way the planes in his image tended to be curved was associated with the imaging conditions rather than with lattice strains, and yet it now seems to be common practice to assume that the dots in an “atomic resolution image” can faithfully represent the variations in atomic spacing at a localised defect. Even when the more reasonable approach is taken of matching the image details with a computed simulation for an assumed model, the non-uniqueness of the interpreted fit seems to be rather rarely appreciated. Hirsch et al., on the other hand, made a point of using their images to get numerical data on characteristics of the specimen they examined, such as its dislocation density, which would not be expected to be influenced by uncertainties in the contrast. Nonetheless the trends were set with microscope manufacturers producing higher and higher resolution microscopes, while the blind faith of the users in the image produced as being a near directly interpretable representation of reality seems to have increased rather than been generally questioned. But if we want to test structural models we need numbers and it is the analogue to digital conversion of the information in the image which is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document