Abstract No. 148: Ex vivo and in vivo testing of a novel nitinol coil radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device for treating large tumors in liver tissue

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. S65
Author(s):  
A. Furse ◽  
B. Miller ◽  
J.R. Kachura ◽  
C. McCann ◽  
M.D. Sherar ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 254 (2) ◽  
pp. 430-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liat Appelbaum ◽  
Jacob Sosna ◽  
Robert Pearson ◽  
Sarah Perez ◽  
Yizhak Nissenbaum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Zhao ◽  
Ohad Ziv ◽  
Reza Mohammadpour ◽  
Benjamin Crosby ◽  
Walter J. Hoyt ◽  
...  

AbstractRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the outcome is often compromised due to the lack of direct real-time feedback to assess lesion transmurality. In this work, we evaluated the ability of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PSOCT) to measure cardiac wall thickness and assess RF lesion transmurality during left atrium (LA) RFA procedures. Quantitative transmural lesion criteria using PSOCT images were determined ex vivo using an integrated PSOCT-RFA catheter and fresh swine hearts. LA wall thickness of living swine was measured with PSOCT and validated with a micrometer after harvesting the heart. A total of 38 point lesions were created in the LA of 5 living swine with the integrated PSOCT-RFA catheter using standard clinical RFA procedures. For all lesions with analyzable PSOCT images, lesion transmurality was assessed with a sensitivity of 89% (17 of 19 tested positive) and a specificity of 100% (5 of 5 tested negative) using the quantitative transmural criteria. This is the first report of using PSOCT to assess LA RFA lesion transmurality in vivo. The results indicate that PSOCT may potentially provide direct real-time feedback for LA wall thickness and lesion transmurality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Takaki ◽  
Yuki Kodama ◽  
Hisao Miyamoto ◽  
Yuto Iijima ◽  
Yoshinari Kikuchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmira Ghahramani Z. ◽  
Peter D. Grimm ◽  
Bahar Saremi ◽  
Jiang Wang ◽  
Syed A. Ahmad ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1522-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Furse ◽  
Brock J. Miller ◽  
Claire McCann ◽  
John R. Kachura ◽  
Michael A. Jewett ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo Na Kim ◽  
Hyunchul Rhim ◽  
Dongil Choi ◽  
Young-sun Kim ◽  
Min Woo Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 089875642110109
Author(s):  
Jane E. Pegg ◽  
Jennifer E. Rawlinson ◽  
Jennifer L Kelley ◽  
Eric Monnet

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of suture pattern and repair length on the load to failure in an ex vivo canine gingival model. Healthy mandibular gingiva and mucosa were harvested from fresh cadavers euthanized for purposes unrelated to the study. Samples were randomly assigned by length and pattern. Lingual and buccal free gingival margins were apposed using a simple interrupted (SI), cruciate (XT), simple continuous (SC), or unidirectional knotless continuous barbed suture (SF) closure technique with USP 4-0 poliglecaprone 25i, ii applied over 2 lengths (3 cm and 6 cm). A custom template was used to ensure uniform suture bite application. Surgical time was recorded. Using a soft tissue mechanical testing frame, samples were tensioned to failure. Testing was video recorded and reviewed in conjunction with the tension trace data for tension at initial failure (Tfail) and maximum tension sustained (Tmax). Two factor ANOVA by length and pattern was performed followed by individual one way T-tests. Statistically significant findings were XT-SC-SF patterns were quicker to perform than SI. SF was more likely to fail by suture breakage than tissue tearing, and SF withstood less tension at the 3 cm length than SI-XT-SC. No significant difference was detected in Tmax or Tfail between SI and SC or XT. The study demonstrates that SC and XT are comparable to SI in tension resistance and faster to perform suggesting that SC and XT could replace SI for extraction site closure although further in vivo testing is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document