Long-term consequences of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy

Objective: Surgical management remains the mainstay treatment for bile duct injury (BDI) post-cholecystectomy. Achieving long-term patency and lessening anastomotic failure depends on important factors including the types of repairs, timing of repairs, and surgical expertise. The present study focused on the impact of these factors on the surgical outcomes of BDI repair. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine patients who were treated with BDI post cholecystectomy at the surgical department between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were categorized as 11 in-house and 48 referral patients, of which 22 patients had bile duct repairs prior to referral. Surgical outcomes and factors, including types of repairs, timing of repairs, and surgical expertise, impacting on the treatment results were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.6 years. The BDI incidence in the authors’ hospital was 0.14%. Complications occurred in 21 patients (35.6%), of which intraabdominal collection was the most common at 10 patients (16.9%). The median length of hospital stay was 16 days for in-house patients and 17 days for the referral group (p=0.542). The mortality rate was 1.7%. The overall patency was 93% with mean follow up 106.4 months. Concerning the primary patency rate, the partial segments IV/V liver resection and hepaticojejunostomy techniques had better long-term patency compared to primary repairs at 92.3% versus 37.5% (p=0.017), and biliary bypass at 92.3% versus 80% (p=0.44). BDI repairs performed by primary surgeons increased the risk of anastomotic failure in comparison to those done by hepatobiliary surgeons with 10-year patency at 53.3% versus 95.4% (p=0.014). Delayed repairs longer than six weeks after injury offered positive long-term outcomes compared to early repairs done within six weeks after injury, with a 10-year patency at 85.4% versus 31.3% (p<0.001). Conclusion: Delayed repair performed by the hepatobiliary surgeon with appropriate surgical techniques decreased anastomosis stricture and achieved good overall surgical outcomes in the management of post cholecystectomy BDI. Keywords: Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Surgical management

Download Full-text

Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury

Digestive Surgery ◽

10.1159/000496432 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (1) ◽

pp. 10-21 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Anne Marthe Schreuder ◽

Olivier R. Busch ◽

Marc G. Besselink ◽

Povilas Ignatavicius ◽

Antanas Gulbinas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Treatment ◽

Bile Duct ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Bile Duct Injury ◽

Surgical Revision ◽

Biliary Cirrhosis ◽

Long Term Outcome ◽

Anastomotic Strictures ◽

Long Term Impact

Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including anastomotic strictures, recurrent cholangitis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis. Methods: We provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on the long-term outcome of BDI. Considering the availability of only limited data regarding treatment of anastomotic strictures in literature, we also retrospectively analyzed patients with anastomotic strictures following a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) from a prospectively maintained database of 836 BDI patients. Results: Although clinical outcomes of endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical treatment of BDI are good with success rates of around 90%, quality of life (QoL) may be impaired even after “clinically successful” treatment. Following surgical treatment, the incidence of anastomotic strictures varies from 5 to 69%, with most studies reporting incidences around 10–20%. The median time to stricture formation varies between 11 and 30 months. Long-term BDI-related mortality varies between 1.8 and 4.6%. Of 91 patients treated in our center for anastomotic strictures after HJ, 81 (89%) were treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation, with a long-term success rate of 77%. Twenty-four patients primarily or secondarily underwent surgical revision, with recurrent strictures occurring in 21%. Conclusions: The long-term impact of BDI is considerable, both in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL. Treatment should be performed in tertiary expert centers to optimize outcomes. Patients require a long-term follow-up to detect anastomotic strictures. Strictures should initially be managed by percutaneous dilatation, with surgical revision as a next step in treatment.

Download Full-text