Predictors of academic performance and school engagement — Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspectives using person-centered and variable-centered approaches

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo A.S. Moreira ◽  
Paulo Dias ◽  
Filipa Machado Vaz ◽  
João Machado Vaz
Author(s):  
Donna Marie Velliaris

As part of an intervention and support strategy, this chapter discusses the evidence-based merits of a tertiary skills development (TSD) course delivered at the Eynesbury Institute of Business and Technology (EIBT) to “students at risk” (STAR). The effectiveness of the TSD course was measured via quantitative means by comparing students' academic performance before, during, and after TSD intervention. It was found that student performance analysed over three consecutive trimesters underwent a significant improvement when the support strategy was provided, followed by a small downturn in performance when the support was removed and students were again relying solely on their independent study skills and self-directed learning.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 849-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Whyte ◽  
Veronica Madigan ◽  
Eric J. Drinkwater

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Credé ◽  
Nathan R. Kuncel

Study habit, skill, and attitude inventories and constructs were found to rival standardized tests and previous grades as predictors of academic performance, yielding substantial incremental validity in predicting academic performance. This meta-analysis ( N = 72,431, k = 344) examines the construct validity and predictive validity of 10 study skill constructs for college students. We found that study skill inventories and constructs are largely independent of both high school grades and scores on standardized admissions tests but moderately related to various personality constructs; these results are inconsistent with previous theories. Study motivation and study skills exhibit the strongest relationships with both grade point average and grades in individual classes. Academic specific anxiety was found to be an important negative predictor of performance. In addition, significant variation in the validity of specific inventories is shown. Scores on traditional study habit and attitude inventories are the most predictive of performance, whereas scores on inventories based on the popular depth-of-processing perspective are shown to be least predictive of the examined criteria. Overall, study habit and skill measures improve prediction of academic performance more than any other noncognitive individual difference variable examined to date and should be regarded as the third pillar of academic success.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document