scholarly journals Circulating cell-free DNA: Translating prostate cancer genomics into clinical care

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 100837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delila Gasi Tandefelt ◽  
Johann de Bono
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1006-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Goodall ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Wei Yuan ◽  
Helen Mossop ◽  
Nuria Porta ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changqing Yin ◽  
Changliang Luo ◽  
Wei Hu ◽  
Xu Ding ◽  
Chunhui Yuan ◽  
...  

As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of cfDNA in PCa. A total of 19 articles were included in this analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then investigated two main subgroups in this meta-analysis, including qualitative analysis of abnormal level of cfDNA and qualitative analysis of single-gene methylation alterations. Overall, the results of quantitative analysis showed sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86). For qualitative assessment, the values were 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22–0.48), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.00), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. Our results suggest the pooled specificity of each subgroup is much higher than the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, they are not recommended for PCa screening alone, because their sensitivities are not higher than the conventional serum biomarkers PSA. We conclude that analysis of cfDNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for PCa screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document