Artificial structures as biological “influencers”: Hydrozoa and Anthozoa diversity in a Colombian Caribbean Marina

2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 113058
Author(s):  
Adriana Gracia C. ◽  
Jeferson Durán-Fuentes ◽  
Nadiezhda Santodomingo ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Buitrago
2021 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice E. Hall ◽  
Roger J. H. Herbert ◽  
Richard Stafford

AbstractCoastal habitats are important for commercially exploited and protected species of fish and larger mobile invertebrates. The addition of artificial structures within the marine environment has the potential to alter the connectivity between habitats and to affect metapopulations of a region. Baited remote underwater videos (BRUV) were used to investigate the spatial and seasonal variation in abundance of adult and juvenile mobile species associated with subtidal natural and artificial habitats within Poole Bay on the south coast of England in 2019. Metrics included the relative maximum abundance (MaxN), number of species seen (S), assemblage structure and size range of fish. Higher values of MaxN and S were recorded on artificial structures in the spring and early summer; however, this pattern was reversed by mid-summer and early autumn when more fish were recorded on the natural reefs. Yet overall differences in MaxN and S between habitats were not significant. Differences in assemblage composition between habitats varied monthly, but this was mostly driven by particular sites. Although most fish observed were juveniles, there were some seasonal differences in the size of fish using natural and artificial sites, especially bib (Trisopterus luscus), black bream (Spondyliosoma cantharus), bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and pollack (Pollachius pollachius). The artificial habitats in this region appeared to be important in certain months, so temporal studies of this type need to be incorporated within surveys, particularly those in proximity to protected areas.


2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 106104
Author(s):  
Atteyeh S. Natanzi ◽  
Bryan J. Thompson ◽  
Paul R. Brooks ◽  
Tasman P. Crowe ◽  
Ciaran McNally

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 634
Author(s):  
Euichi Hirose ◽  
Noburu Sensui

Ascidians are marine sessile chordates that comprise one of the major benthic animal groups in marine ecosystems. They sometimes cause biofouling problems on artificial structures underwater, and non-indigenous, invasive ascidian species can potentially and seriously alter native faunal communities. Ascidian larvae are usually tadpole-shaped, negatively phototactic, and adhere on substrates by secreting a glue from their adhesive organs. Although larvae often prefer hydrophobic surfaces, such as a silicone rubber, for settlement, hydrophobic materials are often used to reduce occurrence of fouling organisms on artificial structures. This inconsistency may indicate that an attractive surface for larvae is not always suitable for settlement. Micro-scale structures or roughness may enhance the settlement of ascidian larvae, but settlement is significantly reduced by a nano-scale nipple array (or moth-eye structure), suggesting functional properties of similar structures found on the body surfaces of various invertebrates. The substrate preferences of larvae should be one of the important bases in considering measures against biofouling, and this review also discusses the potential uses of materials to safely reduce the impacts of invasive species.


2021 ◽  

Ocean sprawl is the proliferation of engineered artificial structures in coastal and offshore marine environments. These include ship hulls; infrastructure associated with land reclamation and urbanization (e.g., seawalls, bridges, floating docks); fisheries (artificial reefs, aquaculture installations); coastal defence structures (e.g., breakwaters, groynes); resource extraction (oil and gas rigs, renewable energy devices); and shipwrecks. Only fixed permanent and semipermanent structures are considered here and ship hulls are not included. Single structures can scale up with dramatic consequences for the local environment. Extreme examples of this include: the “New Great Wall” of China—seawalls enclosing coastal wetlands covering 60 percent of the total length of the Chinese coastline; “The World”, Dubai—an archipelago of over three hundred artificial islands constructed in the shape of a world map; and the “Steel Archipelago,” which describes more than four thousand oil and gas structures in the Gulf of Mexico. The placement of these fixed artificial structures modifies the local physical and chemical environment with cascading impacts on the composition, functioning, and service provision of surrounding species, habitats, and ecosystems. These structures also provide novel habitat which can offer surface for attachment, food, and protection for myriad marine species. They can act as fish aggregating devices, attracting fishing and other human activities. These structures may also have wide-reaching impacts through acting as barriers or conduits to ecological connectivity—the movement of organisms, materials, and energy between habitat units within seascapes. An improved understanding of the biological communities associated with artificial structures, coupled with the global drive for sustainable development, is driving an explosion of research into the design of multifunctional structures with built-in secondary ecological or socioeconomic benefits. Results to date have been promising but greater integration of the fields of ecology, engineering, and social sciences is necessary to better connect theory and practice in this emerging discipline.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Teresa Monteiro Cunningham ◽  
Andreia de Carvalho Saul

The aim of this work was to study the spatial partition dynamics of fish at artificial structures. Holed structured concrete blocks were used to construct eight identical artificial structures and disposed between 3m-6m depths. Installation was made in two steps during 1996 (May/June and November/December) and daily observations were carried out during 30 consecutive days SCUBA diving. The artificial reef areas were used in discriminated ways by the fish community and was most probably influenced by several factor, mainly biotic. The results of the Krustal-Wallis test led to the refutation of the hypothesis that the artificial structure spaces were shared and randomly used by fish.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e52739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Serrano ◽  
Rafel Coma ◽  
Marta Ribes ◽  
Boris Weitzmann ◽  
María García ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document