Anticoagulation quality control in Primary Care with vitamin K antagonists

2017 ◽  
Vol 148 (12) ◽  
pp. 571-572
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Aguirre Rodriguez ◽  
Manuel Jimenez de la Cruz ◽  
Abraham Hidalgo Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists

Quality control of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in primary care patients in Poland: a multi-centre study

2018 ◽  
pp. 764-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolanta Sawicka-Powierza ◽  
Krzysztof Buczkowski ◽  
Sławomir Chlabicz ◽  
Zbigniew Gugnowski ◽  
Katarzyna Powierza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Centre Study ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Comparison of Three Methods to Assess Therapeutic Quality Control of Treatment with Vitamin K Antagonists

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 1260-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Prins ◽  
W. Ken Redekop ◽  
Jan Tijssen ◽  
Siem Heisterkamp ◽  
Harry Büller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Hybrid Method ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Linear Interpolation ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Therapeutic Level

SummaryDuring treatment with vitamin K antagonists, International Normalized Ratios (INR) are determined periodically to maintain a therapeutic level of anticoagulation. We evaluated two existing methods for therapeutic quality control (linear interpolation and equidivision), with regard to their validity and reproducibility. In addition, we proposed and evaluated a (hybrid) method that takes into account potential effects of dosage modifications when INRs are far out of the target range. Validity was assessed by deleting intermediary INR results and estimating this INR based on the two surrounding INRs with each of the three methods. The estimated INRs were then compared with the observed INR.Reproducibility of time spent in an INR range was evaluated for each of the three methods by deleting at random increasing proportions of INRs and comparing these estimates with the situation without deletions. We found that estimates of time spent in INR categories obtained with equidivision were most reproducible, but least valid. The hybrid method showed slightly higher validity and reproducibility in comparison with linear interpolation. Since these differences were small, linear interpolation is preferable to the hybrid method, since the calculations involved are easier.

Idiopathic venous thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 52-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Kyrle
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Antithrombin Deficiency ◽  
Optimal Duration ◽  
Risk Of Treatment

SummaryVenous thrombosis is a chronic disease with a recurrence rate of approximately 30% within 5-8 years. The optimal duration of secondary thromboprophylaxis in these patients entails balancing the risk of recurrence against the risk of treatment-associated bleeding. There is agreement that patients with a first idiopathic venous thrombosis should receive vitamin K antagonists for at least 3-6 months. Convincing trials showing a clinical benefit in terms of morbidity or mortality with respect to expansion of anticoagulation beyond 6 months are lacking. Nevertheless, some subgroups of patients with venous thrombosis may benefit from indefinite anticoagulation. Thus, patients with antithrombin deficiency, combined or homozygous defects, more than one unprovoked episode of thrombosis, the lupus anticoagulant or high factor VIII plasma levels are good candidates for long-term prevention.

Spectrophotometric Assays of Prothrombin in Plasma of Patients Using Oral Anticoagulants

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1296-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Bertina ◽  
W van der Marel-van Nieuwkoop ◽  
E A Loeliger
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Factor Ii ◽  
K Deficiency

SummaryTwo spectrophotometric assays for prothrombin have been developed and compared with a one stage coagulant and an immunological assay. One of these assays (called the XAPC assay) uses a combination of factor Xa, phospholipid, Ca2+ and factor V as activator of prothrombin, and measures only normal prothrombin. The second (the ECAR assay) uses Echis carinatus venom as activator. This assay measures both normal prothrombin and PIVKA II (protein induced by vitamin K antagonists/absence). Combination of the results obtained by the XAPC and ECAR assays provides rapid and reliable information on the degree of “subcarboxylation” of prothrombin (oral anticoagulation, vitamin K deficiency).For patients on long term anticoagulant treatment the prothrombin time (Thrombotest) shows better correlation with the ratio prothrombin/prothrombin plus PIVKA II (XAPC/ ECAR) than with the factor II concentration. For patients starting the anticoagulant treatment there is no correlation between the Thrombotest time and the XAPC/ECAR ratio.It seems doubtful that (a) spectrophotometric factor II assay(s) will be as useful as the prothrombin time in the control of oral anticoagulation.

New Drugs for Thromboembolic Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Jose L Merino ◽  
Jose López-Sendón ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia and its prevalence is increasing in developed countries. This progressive increase and the negative impact of this arrhythmia on the patient’s prognosis make AF one of the main healthcare problems faced today. This has led to intense research into the main aspects of AF, one of them being thromboembolism prevention. AF patients have a four to five times higher risk of stroke than the general population. Several factors increase thromboembolic risk in patients with AF and the use of risk scores, such as the Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age Greater than 75, Diabetes, and Prior Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHADS2), have been used to identify the best candidates for anticoagulation. Antithrombotic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for embolic prevention. The clinical use of these drugs is based on the risk–benefit ratio, where benefit is the reduction of stroke and systemic embolic events and risk is mostly driven by the increase in bleeding events. Generally, antiplatelets are indicated for low-risk patients in light of the fact anticoagulants are the drug of choice for moderate- or high-risk patients. Vitamin K antagonists have been the only option for oral anticoagulation for the last 50 years. However, these drugs have many pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic problems. The problems of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists have led to the investigation of new drugs that can be administered orally and have a better dose–response relationship, a shorter half-life and, in particular, higher efficacy and safety without the need for frequent anticoagulation controls. The drugs that have been studied most thoroughly in patients with AF are inhibitors of the activated coagulation factor X and inhibitors of coagulation factor II (thrombin), including ximelagatran and dabigatran. In addition, non-pharmacological therapies have been developed to prevent recurrent embolism in certain patient populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document