Post-thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis: The role of follow-up Doppler ultrasound

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
Francisco Galeano-Valle ◽  
Jorge del-Toro-Cervera ◽  
Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Predictors of long-term post-thrombotic syndrome following high proximal deep vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Engeseth ◽  
Tone Enden ◽  
Per Morten Sandset ◽  
Hilde Skuterud Wik
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent chronic complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb, but predictors of PTS are not well established. We aimed to examine predictors of PTS in patients with long-term PTS following proximal DVT. Methods During 2006–09, 209 patients with a first time acute upper femoral or iliofemoral DVT were randomized to receive either additional catheter-directed thrombolysis or conventional therapy alone. In 2017, the 170 still-living participants were invited to participate in a cross-sectional follow-up study. In the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test, PTS was defined in line with clinical practice by four mandatory, predefined clinical criteria: 1. An objectively verified DVT; 2. Chronic complaints (> 1 month) in the DVT leg; 3. Complaints appeared after the DVT; and 4. An alternative diagnosis was unlikely. Possible predictors of PTS were identified with multivariate logistic regression. Results Eighty-eight patients (52%) were included 8–10 years following the index DVT, and 44 patients (50%) were diagnosed with PTS by the predefined clinical criteria. Younger age and higher baseline Villalta score were found to be independent predictors of PTS, i.e., OR 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99), and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02–1.49), respectively. Lack of iliofemoral patency at six months follow-up was significant in the bivariate analysis, but did not prove to be significant after the multivariate adjustments. Conclusions In long-term follow up after high proximal DVT, younger age and higher Villalta score at DVT diagnosis were independent predictors of PTS.

Prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome: role of fibrinolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiberio Rocca ◽  
Andrea Manfrini ◽  
Luca Traina ◽  
Pierfilippo Acciarri ◽  
Vincenzo Gasbarro
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

Contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence in chronic venous disease – A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Duarte-Gamas ◽  
João P Rocha-Neves ◽  
António Pereira-Neves ◽  
Marina Dias-Neto ◽  
Niels Baekgaard
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Iliac Vein ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Antithrombotic Treatment ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Anticoagulation Treatment ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

Objective Stenting of the iliac veins is increasingly considered in the presence of symptomatic obstructive chronic lesions in the iliac vein segment. However, it is often necessary to extend the stented zone into the inferior vena cava, increasing the risk of contralateral iliac vein thrombosis. This study aims to review the current literature concerning the incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis after stenting across the iliocaval confluence. Methods A systematic review from potentially relevant published articles reporting contralateral deep vein thrombosis after iliac venous stenting between January 2007 and February 2019 was performed. Results A total of 764 references were retrieved initially. Twelve studies reporting events of contralateral deep vein thrombosis were selected for review, with a total of 1864 patients. Contralateral deep vein thrombosis incidence varied between 0% and 15.6%. The post-interventional and follow-up anticoagulation regimens were heterogeneous between studies. The decision to maintain patients on anticoagulation and the duration of treatment was based on the presence of comorbidities, hypercoagulable states, post-thrombotic syndrome and history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Patients with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions were either anticoagulated for three or six months after stenting or received no anticoagulation. Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome were anticoagulated for longer periods. Most studies (eight studies) used an oral vitamin K antagonist agent. The data on compliance with anticoagulation treatment is scarce and few references present data on whether contralateral deep vein thrombosis occurred during anticoagulation treatment. The use of antiplatelet agents in addition to the anticoagulant treatment in the follow-up period was also variable. Conclusion The incidence of contralateral deep vein thrombosis due to iliac vein jailing is not negligible and reported being as high as 15.6%. Large-scale studies on the ideal antithrombotic treatment and its impact are necessary. It is possible that patients with stent crossing the iliocaval confluence might benefit from long-term antithrombotic treatment.

Long-term follow-up of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity: survival, risk factors and post-thrombotic syndrome

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 503-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk J. Baarslag ◽  
Maria M.W. Koopman ◽  
Barbara A. Hutten ◽  
May W. Linthorst Homan ◽  
Harry R. Büller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Survival Risk ◽  
Deep Vein

Does prescription of medical compression prevent development of post-thrombotic syndrome after proximal deep venous thrombosis?

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Perrin ◽  
Bo Eklöf
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Elastic Compression ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

Aim The aim of this review is to try to explain the controversy by critical analysis of previously published randomized controlled trials on the value of elastic compression stockings in the treatment of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis in prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome, which forms the scientific basis for our present management. Methods A research was made through Medline and Embase databases to identify relevant original articles, not abstracts, with the following keywords: post-thrombotic syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, compression stockings, prevention and compliance. Results We identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) before the SOX trial including 798 patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis. Brandjes (1997): at two years’ follow-up, elastic compression stockings reduced post-thrombotic syndrome by 50%; Ginsberg (2001): no difference in post-thrombotic syndrome with or without elastic compression stockings after more than two years’ follow-up; Partsch (2004): elastic compression stockings with routine above knee and early ambulation reduced the incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome after two years’ follow-up; Prandoni (2004) showed significantly less post-thrombotic syndrome after elastic compression stockings for two years with a five-year follow-up; Aschwanden (2008) showed no difference with elastic compression stockings after three years’ follow-up. Conclusion Prescription of elastic compression stockings for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome is now in doubt. Immediate compression after diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis to prevent swelling and reduce pain, permitting early ambulation in combination with adequate anticoagulation has proven benefit, although a secondary analysis of the SOX trial refutes this belief. Continued long-term compression treatment is questioned. Two major questions remain: Is the lack of positive outcome on the development of post-thrombotic syndrome after proximal deep vein thrombosis due to the fact that there were a few patients with iliofemoral extension in the quoted randomized controlled trials who may benefit from prolonged medical compression treatment? Compliance is the major issue, and the two randomized controlled trials with excellent control of compliance showed significant reduction in the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome, but we know that in daily practice the adherence is closer to Kahn’s data.

Endovascular management of proximal lower limb deep venous thrombosis – A prospective study with six-month follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Patra ◽  
BC Srinivas ◽  
CM Nagesh ◽  
B Reddy ◽  
CN Manjunath
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Proximal Lower Limb

Background Catheter-directed thrombolysis with assisted mechanical thrombolysis is the standard of medical care for proximal deep vein thrombosis. We studied the immediate and intermediate (six months) safety and effectiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis. Methodology Thirty consecutive patients aged between 20 and 70 years with proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis formed the study group. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was done with streptokinase infuse through a catheter kept in the ipsilateral popliteal vein. Unfractionated heparin was given along with streptokinase. Mechanical thromboaspiration using guiding catheter was performed in addition to thrombolytic therapy. After six months, post-thrombotic syndrome and deep venous patency were assessed by using Villalta scale and duplex ultrasound, respectively. Results Thirty patients with proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Mean age of the study patients was 41.7 ± 15 years. Mean duration of illness was 13.3 ± 12 days. The mean duration of thrombolysis was 4.5 ± 1.3 days. Grade III (complete) lysis was achieved in 10 (33%) and Grade II (50–90%) lysis in 20 (67%) of patients. Patients with significant residual lesion in Grade II lysis following catheter-directed thrombolysis underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone (12/20) or venous stenting (8/20). All patients improved clinically following catheter-directed thrombolysis or assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis. Four patients (13%) developed pulmonary embolism during course of hospital stay and among them two (6.5%) patients died. Eleven patients (37%) had minor bleeding or hematoma at local site, and seven (23%) developed anemia requiring blood transfusion and four (13%) patients had thrombocytopenia. After six months, iliofemoral patency was found in 20 (72%) and post-thrombotic syndrome was seen in six (21%) patients. Two (6.5%) patients died during follow-up due to nephrotic syndrome and carcinoma breast. Conclusion Catheter-directed thrombolysis and conventional manual aspiration thrombectomy are an effective treatment for proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis with good short and intermediate outcome.

Review on the value of graduated elastic compression stockings after deep vein thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Kakkos ◽  
Stella Daskalopoulou ◽  
Marios Daskalopoulos ◽  
Andrew Nicolaides ◽  
George Geroulakos
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Elastic Compression ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryGraduated elastic compression stockings (GECS) are commonly used in the primary prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT); however, their role in preventing recurrent DVT and also post-thrombotic syndrome is less well established. The aim of this review was to investigate the effect of GECS after DVT. A literature search was performed by two independent searchers in order to identify randomised controlled trials on the effect of GECS in preventing recurrent DVT and post-thrombotic syndrome. Four randomised trials, including 537 patients, were identified. Two of the studies demonstrated that below-knee GECS significantly reduced post-thrombotic syndrome during follow-up, while a smaller study showed equivocal results. GECS reduced the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome from 54% to 25.2% [relative risk (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.61] with the number needed to treat (NNT) being 4 (95% CI 2.7-5.0).The rate of recurrent asymptomatic DVT was also significantly reduced by GECS (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.64; NNT 5); the reduction in symptomatic DVT was not significant (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.50-1.26; NNT 34). In conclusion, there is level Ia evidence to suggest that GECS can significantly reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after DVT, and therefore these should be routinely prescribed. The evidence for recurrent DVT is less conclusive. Further research is needed towards standardising PTS diagnostic criteria and evaluating more effective preventive measures after DVT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document