Electric field estimation of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation clinically used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in anatomical head models

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Parazzini ◽  
Serena Fiocchi ◽  
Emma Chiaramello ◽  
Yiftach Roth ◽  
Abraham Zangen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Guadagnin ◽  
M. Parazzini ◽  
S. Fiocchi ◽  
I. Liorni ◽  
Y. Roth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Balderston ◽  
Joanne C. Beer ◽  
Darsol Seok ◽  
Walid Makhoul ◽  
Zhi-De Deng ◽  
...  

AbstractResting state functional connectivity (rsFC) offers promise for individualizing stimulation targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatments. However, current targeting approaches do not account for non-focal TMS effects or large-scale connectivity patterns. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel targeting optimization approach that combines whole-brain rsFC and electric-field (e-field) modelling to identify single-subject, symptom-specific TMS targets. In this proof of concept study, we recruited 91 anxious misery (AM) patients and 25 controls. We measured depression symptoms (MADRS/HAMD) and recorded rsFC. We used a PCA regression to predict symptoms from rsFC and estimate the parameter vector, for input into our e-field augmented model. We modeled 17 left dlPFC and 7 M1 sites using 24 equally spaced coil orientations. We computed single-subject predicted ΔMADRS/HAMD scores for each site/orientation using the e-field augmented model, which comprises a linear combination of the following elementwise products (1) the estimated connectivity/symptom coefficients, (2) a vectorized e-field model for site/orientation, (3) rsFC matrix, scaled by a proportionality constant. In AM patients, our connectivity-based model predicted a significant decrease depression for sites near BA9, but not M1 for coil orientations perpendicular to the cortical gyrus. In control subjects, no site/orientation combination showed a significant predicted change. These results corroborate previous work suggesting the efficacy of left dlPFC stimulation for depression treatment, and predict better outcomes with individualized targeting. They also suggest that our novel connectivity-based e-field modelling approach may effectively identify potential TMS treatment responders and individualize TMS targeting to maximize the therapeutic impact.


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 829-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Iannone ◽  
Antonio Pedro de Mello Cruz ◽  
Joaquim Pereira Brasil-Neto ◽  
Raphael Boechat-Barros

ABSTRACT Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has recently been investigated as a possible adjuvant treatment for many neuropsychiatric disorders, and has already been approved for the treatment of drug-resistant depression in the United States and in Brazil, among other countries. Although its use in other neuropsychiatric disorders is still largely experimental, many physicians have been using it as an off-label add-on therapy for various disorders. More recently, another technique, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has also become available as a much cheaper and portable alternative to TMS, although its mechanisms of action are different from those of TMS. The use of off-label therapeutic TMS or tDCS tends to occur in the setting of diseases that are notoriously resistant to other treatment modalities. Here we discuss the case of anxiety disorders, namely panic and post-traumatic stress disorders, highlighting the uncertainties and potential problems and benefits of the clinical use of these neuromodulatory techniques at the current stage of knowledge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3595-3614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Balderston ◽  
Camille Roberts ◽  
Emily M. Beydler ◽  
Zhi-De Deng ◽  
Thomas Radman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Amad ◽  
Renaud Jardri ◽  
Chloé Rousseau ◽  
Yann Larochelle ◽  
John P.A. Ioannidis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document