scholarly journals Training high-performance and large-scale deep neural networks with full 8-bit integers

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 70-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukuan Yang ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
Shuang Wu ◽  
Tianyi Yan ◽  
Yuan Xie ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuyong Xing ◽  
Yuanpu Xie ◽  
Xiaoshuang Shi ◽  
Pingjun Chen ◽  
Zizhao Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nucleus or cell detection is a fundamental task in microscopy image analysis and supports many other quantitative studies such as object counting, segmentation, tracking, etc. Deep neural networks are emerging as a powerful tool for biomedical image computing; in particular, convolutional neural networks have been widely applied to nucleus/cell detection in microscopy images. However, almost all models are tailored for specific datasets and their applicability to other microscopy image data remains unknown. Some existing studies casually learn and evaluate deep neural networks on multiple microscopy datasets, but there are still several critical, open questions to be addressed. Results We analyze the applicability of deep models specifically for nucleus detection across a wide variety of microscopy image data. More specifically, we present a fully convolutional network-based regression model and extensively evaluate it on large-scale digital pathology and microscopy image datasets, which consist of 23 organs (or cancer diseases) and come from multiple institutions. We demonstrate that for a specific target dataset, training with images from the same types of organs might be usually necessary for nucleus detection. Although the images can be visually similar due to the same staining technique and imaging protocol, deep models learned with images from different organs might not deliver desirable results and would require model fine-tuning to be on a par with those trained with target data. We also observe that training with a mixture of target and other/non-target data does not always mean a higher accuracy of nucleus detection, and it might require proper data manipulation during model training to achieve good performance. Conclusions We conduct a systematic case study on deep models for nucleus detection in a wide variety of microscopy images, aiming to address several important but previously understudied questions. We present and extensively evaluate an end-to-end, pixel-to-pixel fully convolutional regression network and report a few significant findings, some of which might have not been reported in previous studies. The model performance analysis and observations would be helpful to nucleus detection in microscopy images.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Nonaka ◽  
Kei Majima ◽  
Shuntaro C. Aoki ◽  
Yukiyasu Kamitani

SummaryAchievement of human-level image recognition by deep neural networks (DNNs) has spurred interest in whether and how DNNs are brain-like. Both DNNs and the visual cortex perform hierarchical processing, and correspondence has been shown between hierarchical visual areas and DNN layers in representing visual features. Here, we propose the brain hierarchy (BH) score as a metric to quantify the degree of hierarchical correspondence based on the decoding of individual DNN unit activations from human brain activity. We find that BH scores for 29 pretrained DNNs with varying architectures are negatively correlated with image recognition performance, indicating that recently developed high-performance DNNs are not necessarily brain-like. Experimental manipulations of DNN models suggest that relatively simple feedforward architecture with broad spatial integration is critical to brain-like hierarchy. Our method provides new ways for designing DNNs and understanding the brain in consideration of their representational homology.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Saqib Akhoon ◽  
Shahrel A. Suandi ◽  
Abdullah Alshahrani ◽  
Abdul‐Malik H. Y. Saad ◽  
Fahad R. Albogamy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 4129-4140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Mills ◽  
Kevin Ryczko ◽  
Iryna Luchak ◽  
Adam Domurad ◽  
Chris Beeler ◽  
...  

We present a physically-motivated topology of a deep neural network that can efficiently infer extensive parameters (such as energy, entropy, or number of particles) of arbitrarily large systems, doing so with scaling.


2019 ◽  
Vol 324 ◽  
pp. 108311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Parvathaneni ◽  
Vishwesh Nath ◽  
Maureen McHugo ◽  
Yuankai Huo ◽  
Susan M. Resnick ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shisheng Wang ◽  
Hongwen Zhu ◽  
Hu Zhou ◽  
Jingqiu Cheng ◽  
Hao Yang

Abstract Background Mass spectrometry (MS) has become a promising analytical technique to acquire proteomics information for the characterization of biological samples. Nevertheless, most studies focus on the final proteins identified through a suite of algorithms by using partial MS spectra to compare with the sequence database, while the pattern recognition and classification of raw mass-spectrometric data remain unresolved. Results We developed an open-source and comprehensive platform, named MSpectraAI, for analyzing large-scale MS data through deep neural networks (DNNs); this system involves spectral-feature swath extraction, classification, and visualization. Moreover, this platform allows users to create their own DNN model by using Keras. To evaluate this tool, we collected the publicly available proteomics datasets of six tumor types (a total of 7,997,805 mass spectra) from the ProteomeXchange consortium and classified the samples based on the spectra profiling. The results suggest that MSpectraAI can distinguish different types of samples based on the fingerprint spectrum and achieve better prediction accuracy in MS1 level (average 0.967). Conclusion This study deciphers proteome profiling of raw mass spectrometry data and broadens the promising application of the classification and prediction of proteomics data from multi-tumor samples using deep learning methods. MSpectraAI also shows a better performance compared to the other classical machine learning approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (09) ◽  
pp. P09014-P09014 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nottbeck ◽  
Dr. C. Schmitt ◽  
Prof. Dr. V. Büscher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document