Effect of dietary sodium restriction on blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Ren ◽  
Liqiang Qin ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Zhixing Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Sodium ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Sodium Restriction ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Dietary Sodium Restriction

The effects of sulfonylureas plus metformin on lipids, blood pressure, and adverse events in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Endocrine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Hao Xiang ◽  
Yunzhou Fan ◽  
Tsend-ayush Ganchuluun ◽  
Wenhua Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of a Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitor Versus Placebo as an Add-on Therapy for People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Treated With Metformin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A469-A470
Author(s):  
Jia Leng Lim ◽  
Georgina Bergero ◽  
Yogesh Acharya ◽  
James Shaw ◽  
Aaron Liew
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Mycotic Infections

Abstract Metformin monotherapy is often insufficient to achieve or sustain glycemic targets in people with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus placebo as add-on therapy after metformin in type 2 diabetes. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was performed in the PubMed, www.clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant randomized controlled trials up until 30th October 2020 that compared sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus placebo as add-on therapy to metformin. A random-effects model was used. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (4270 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor treatment, as add-on therapy to metformin, was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c level (mean difference [MD]: -0.6%, 95% CI: -0.7, -0.5; p<0.01), fasting plasma glucose level (MD: -1.4mmol/l; 95% CI; -1.5, -1.3; p<0.01), weight (MD: -2.0kg; 95% CI: -2.2, -1.8; p<0.01), systolic blood pressure (MD: -4.7mmHg; 95% Cl: -5.4, -3.9; p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (MD: -2.0mmHg; 95% Cl: -2.5, -1.5; p<0.01). Significantly more participants achieved HbA1c <7% (odds ratio [OR]: 3.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 3.6; p<0.01) in the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor group. Genital mycotic infections (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.4, 4.6; p<0.01) were more common with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, but there was no significant statistical difference in urinary tract infections (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.0; p=0.06), in hypoglycemia (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.4; p=0.07), or in discontinuation rates due to adverse events (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.5; p=0.68) between the two groups. In summary, in comparison with placebo, add-on therapy with a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor is significantly more efficacious in lowering HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight and blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes following inadequate glycemic control with metformin. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was similar despite higher risk of genital mycotic infections.

Vitamin D ameliorates systolic but not diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 90-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Jafari ◽  
Aziz A. Fallah ◽  
Noushin Rostampour ◽  
Leila Mahmoodnia
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic

Abstract. Inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the effects of vitamin D on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to evaluate the subject through a meta-analysis. A computerized literature search on five databases was performed and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until March 2016 were identified. The eligibility criteria for articles to be selected were parallel-group RCTs in which consumption of a kind of vitamin D was compared with placebo in patients with T2D. Un-standardized mean difference and its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) was calculated from the effect sizes by using random effects model. Studies comparing intervention group (received vitamin D) with control group (received placebo) were enrolled in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis on 26 studies with 1789 type 2 diabetic subjects showed that vitamin D significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP; –0.97 mmHg, 95 % CI: –1.94, –0.001, P = 0.050), but not diastolic blood pressure (DBP; –0.10 mmHg, 95 % CI: –0.22, 0.02, P = 0.087). Subgroup analyses showed that administration of vitamin D in patients with baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D < 50 nmol/l and baseline SBP < 140 mmHg significantly reduced SBP. Moreover, the patients who received vitamin D without Ca co-supplementation showed significant reduction in SBP. Vitamin D doses (≤ 2000 or > 2000 IU/day) and method of vitamin D application (Supplementation or food fortification) did not affect the blood pressure. This study demonstrated that vitamin D improved SBP in type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, this vitamin can be considered as an adjuvant therapy in these patients.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of metformin-SGLT2i versus metformin-sulfonylureas in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desye Gebrie ◽  
Desalegn Getnet ◽  
Tsegahun Manyazewal
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter

AbstractDiabetes is a serious threat to global health and among the top 10 causes of death, with nearly half a billion people living with it worldwide. Treating patients with diabetes tend to become more challenging due to the progressive nature of the disease. The role and benefits of combination therapies for the management of type 2 diabetes are well-documented, while the comparative safety and efficacy among the different combination options have not been elucidated. We aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the comparative cardiovascular safety and efficacy of combination therapy with metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus metformin-sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 15 August 2019 without restriction in the year of publication. We included randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes who were on metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or metformin-sulphonylureas combination therapy at least for a year. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hypoglycemia, and changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We used a random-effects meta-analysis model to estimate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes. We followed PICOS description model for defining eligibility and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines for reporting results. Of 3,190 citations, we included nine trials involving 10,974 participants. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ration [RR] = 0.93, 95% CI [0.52, 1.67]), serious adverse events (RR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.79, 1.17]) and adverse events (RR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.99, 1.02]) between the two, but in hypoglycemia (RR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17], P < 0.001). Participants taking metformin-sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors showed a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (mean difference [MD] = − 0.10%, 95% CI [− 0.17, − 0.03], body weight (MD = − 4.57 kg, 95% CI [− 4.74, − 4.39], systolic blood pressure (MD = − 4.77 mmHg, 95% CI [− 5.39, − 4.16]), diastolic blood pressure (MD = − 2.07 mmHg, 95% CI [− 2.74, − 1.40], and fasting plasma glucose (MD = − 0.55 mmol/L, 95% CI [− 0.69, − 0.41]), p < 0.001. Combination therapy of metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors is a safe and efficacious alternative to combination therapy of metformin and sulphonylureas for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at risk of cardiovascular comorbidity. However, there remains a need for additional long-term randomized controlled trials as available studies are very limited and heterogeneous.

Effects of chromium supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 105098
Author(s):  
Omid Asbaghi ◽  
Naeini Fatemeh ◽  
Rezaei Kelishadi Mahnaz ◽  
Ghaedi Ehsan ◽  
Eslampour Elham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document