Indicators of nutritional screening in hospital records of newly diagnosed Hispanic and Asian-American adult cancer patients in Connecticut

Quality control of data collected in the United States by the Cancer End Results Program utilizing punchcards prepared by participating registries in accordance with a Uniform Punchcard Code is discussed. Existing arrangements decentralize responsibility for editing and related data processing to the local registries with centralization of tabulating and statistical services in the End Results Section, National Cancer Institute. The most recent deck of punchcards represented over 600,000 cancer patients; approximately 50,000 newly diagnosed cases are added annually.Mechanical editing and inspection of punchcards and field audits are the principal tools for quality control. Mechanical editing of the punchcards includes testing for blank entries and detection of in-admissable or inconsistent codes. Highly improbable codes are subjected to special scrutiny. Field audits include the drawing of a 1-10 percent random sample of punchcards submitted by a registry; the charts are .then reabstracted and recoded by a NCI staff member and differences between the punchcard and the results of independent review are noted.

Download Full-text

Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in high-risk patients and newly diagnosed breast cancer patients; a systematic review

International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries ◽

10.24911/ijmdc.51-1538825110 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Basmah Altuwayjiri

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Quantitative Analysis ◽

High Risk ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Download Full-text

Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients

The Women s Oncology Review ◽

10.3109/14733400400013055 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. 237-240

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Counseling And Testing ◽

Brca1 Brca2

Download Full-text

Patient Portal and Navigation Program in Providing Information for Asian American Cancer Patients

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct03867916 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Asian American ◽

Patient Portal ◽

Navigation Program

Download Full-text

Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients

European Radiology ◽

10.1007/s00330-021-07956-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽

Julian Kirchner ◽

Lale Umutlu ◽

Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽

Robert Seifert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Bone Metastases ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Bone Scintigraphy ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Primary Breast Cancer ◽

Whole Body ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Initial Staging

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.

Download Full-text