Site-specific Modeling of self-reacting point absorber in real wave spectrum

2021 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 109736
Author(s):  
Sudharsan Kalidoss ◽  
Arindam Banerjee
Author(s):  
George A. Aggidis ◽  
Mohammad T. Rahmati ◽  
Robert V. Chaplin ◽  
Andrew P. McCabe ◽  
Majid A. Bhinder ◽  
...  

This paper presents the optimum power capture of a new point-absorber wave energy converter, in irregular waves. A stepwise control system for the wave energy converter (WEC) is developed. The control system is used to efficiently extract power from irregular waves where amplitudes vary from wave to wave. The Bretschneider spectrum is used in the experiment and the device is ‘tuned’ to the peak period of the sea state. It is shown that this WEC has a reasonable capture width in irregular waves. However, the optimum mean power depends on the wave spectrum, the shape of the collector body, its freeboard and the device pivot depth.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Karin ◽  
Anubhav Jain

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110207
Author(s):  
Youssef MA Hashash ◽  
Okan Ilhan ◽  
Halil Uysal ◽  
Jonathan P Stewart ◽  
Sissy Nikolaou ◽  
...  

The Next Generation Attenuation Relationships for Central & Eastern North-America (NGA-East) Geotechnical Working Group (GWG) has presented models for site amplification in Central and Eastern North America that represent a significant change from past practice, which was based on models developed for active tectonic regions. The GWG models are ergodic in their formulation, meaning that they produce an average level of amplification conditional on VS30 and other the site parameters. We illustrate the application of these models to four sites in Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, and New York City, and compare results with site-specific ground response analyses. The results indicate that substantial advantage is possible when ergodic models conditioned only on VS30 are supplemented with a modular term that produces a peak at one or more site natural periods ( Tnat). The article demonstrates features and limitations of the GWG models for sites in Central and Eastern North America and provides useful recommendations for coupling ergodic and non-ergodic (site-specific) modeling as part of seismic hazard studies.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.J. Sadler ◽  
B.K. Gerwig ◽  
D.E. Evans ◽  
W.J. Busscher ◽  
P.J. Bauer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document