Experimental Analysis and Site-Specific Modeling of Channel Parameters at Mobile Station in an Urban Macrocellular Environment

2008 ◽  
Vol E91-B (4) ◽  
pp. 1132-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. SIVASONDHIVAT ◽  
J.-i. TAKADA ◽  
I. IDA ◽  
Y. OISHI
Author(s):  
Ashish Malik ◽  
S. K. Singh ◽  
Mohit Kumar

Abstract For economical design, scour around the bridge piers is required to be controlled. In the present study, an attempt has been made to minimize scour depth by placing a triangular prism on the downstream side of a circular pier (35 mm dia) with one of its noses facing the direction of flow and other facing opposite to the direction of flow. Three different bed samples collected from Ghaggar, Patialki-Rao and the Kotla super-passage have been placed in a rectangular flume. Discharge values were varied from 0.0015 to 0.0186 m3/sec. Results are compared for observed scour-depth for upstream (U/S) and downstream (D/S) piers with and without protection. Arrangement with a triangular prism of 2.5 times the diameter of the circular pier in the upstream direction of the flow is very effective in reducing scour depth. Further, it is possible to reduce the scour depth with an average efficiency of 65% for Ghaggar, 56% for Patialaki-Rao and 64% for the Kotla super-passage with respect to the circular pier. The comparison of observed values of scour-depth with computed values of Lacey's scour-depth was underestimated with a maximum of ±70%. Hence, a new site-specific relationship between scour depth, discharge intensity and silt factor has been proposed. Validation of the new proposed relationship with observed data is in a good agreement ±20%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Karin ◽  
Anubhav Jain

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110207
Author(s):  
Youssef MA Hashash ◽  
Okan Ilhan ◽  
Halil Uysal ◽  
Jonathan P Stewart ◽  
Sissy Nikolaou ◽  
...  

The Next Generation Attenuation Relationships for Central & Eastern North-America (NGA-East) Geotechnical Working Group (GWG) has presented models for site amplification in Central and Eastern North America that represent a significant change from past practice, which was based on models developed for active tectonic regions. The GWG models are ergodic in their formulation, meaning that they produce an average level of amplification conditional on VS30 and other the site parameters. We illustrate the application of these models to four sites in Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, and New York City, and compare results with site-specific ground response analyses. The results indicate that substantial advantage is possible when ergodic models conditioned only on VS30 are supplemented with a modular term that produces a peak at one or more site natural periods ( Tnat). The article demonstrates features and limitations of the GWG models for sites in Central and Eastern North America and provides useful recommendations for coupling ergodic and non-ergodic (site-specific) modeling as part of seismic hazard studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1850168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nenad Milosevic ◽  
Caslav Stefanovic ◽  
Zorica Nikolic ◽  
Milos Bandjur ◽  
Mihajlo Stefanovic

In this paper, we consider a cooperative mobile-to-mobile wireless short-term Weibull fading channel. The source mobile station communicates with the destination via a relay. The channel is considered to be interference-limited, and the interference is present at both relay and the destination. The exact closed-form expressions for the destination mobile station signal-to-interference ratio probability density function and the cumulative distribution function are derived. Approximate numerically efficient closed-form expressions for the level crossing rate and the average fade duration are also derived, using Laplace approximation for a three-fold integral. The influence of the fading channel parameters on the mentioned statistical measures is investigated. The theoretical results are verified by the Monte-Carlo simulation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.J. Sadler ◽  
B.K. Gerwig ◽  
D.E. Evans ◽  
W.J. Busscher ◽  
P.J. Bauer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document