Results of Herbert screw fixation in scaphoid fracture: A prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
Ramji Lal Sahu
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Ravi Mehrotra ◽  
Sanjeev Mahawar ◽  
Dhruv Lashkare ◽  
Raj * Jaiswal

The study aimed to assess clinical, radiological as well as functional outcome in patients of scaphoid fracture following open reduction as compared to percutaneous xation with Herbert Screw. This study was conducted at Department of orthopedics, for 1 year on 30 patients of scaphoid fracture. Fractures were rst tried for percutaneous xation using volar approach, ORIF with volar approach was used when adequate reduction was not achieved. Patients were followed at 2 week interval till union. Clinical assessment at nal followup was performed using MMWS. The mean mean duration of presentation after injury of 19.9 days (3 to 162 days). The mean MMWS score was 93.8 (90-100) for percutaneous and 83.8 (70-95) for ORIF. Since fracture treated with percutaneous xation are associated with early union and early return to functional activity as compared to ORIF, Herbert screw for xation with percutaneous technique for scaphoid fracture must be encouraged for displaced or undisplaced fracture


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
AshishBalkrishna Patidar ◽  
RahulPushpendra Mehta ◽  
SantoshKumar Sharma ◽  
GorishankerBasantilal Vyas ◽  
Vivek Singh ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
N P Parajuli ◽  
D Shrestha ◽  
D Dhoju ◽  
R Shrestha ◽  
V Sharma

Background Most scaphoid fractures though heal uneventfully with cast treatment, immobilization with cast is associated with complication like wrist stiffness. Open reduction and fixation with Herbert Screw though technically demanding procedure can yield excellent results and prevents complication like nonunions and loss of wrist function. Objectives To assess clinical outcome and radiological union of scaphoid fracture after operative management following Herbert screw fixation in patient attending Dhulikhel Hospital. Methods All scaphoid fracture, treated from Feb 2007 till Feb 2011, were retrospectively studied in Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital. Fifteen patients with scaphoid fractures were treated with Herbert screw. Fourteen were males and one was female. Serial radiographs were taken to assess radiographic union and functional outcome was assessed using Modified Mayo wrist score. Results Out of 15 patients, 13 scaphoid had waist fractures and two had proximal pole factures. All scaphoid were treated with open reduction and Herbert screw fixation either by volar approach or by dorsal approach. All fractures maintained good alignment post operatively. Nine (60%) patients had excellent results with normal wrist range of motion, five (33.3%) patients had good results and one (6.7%) patient had poor outcome. In 14 (93.3%) patients good radiological union was seen at final follow up at six months time. Conclusion Fixation with Herbert screw for scaphoid fracture is an effective and convenient way of treatment with satisfactory functional outcome and less complication.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6342 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2011;9(4):267-73


Hand Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
In-Ho Jeon ◽  
Chang-Wug Oh ◽  
Byung-Chul Park ◽  
Joo-Chul Ihn ◽  
Poong-Taek Kim

The purpose of this study is to document the percutaneous Herbert screw fixation technique with free-hand method to stabilise acute unstable scaphoid fractures and evaluated the clinical results. Thirteen patients with less than 14 day-old fractures were fixed by percutaneous Herbert screw and reviewed retrospectively for a minimum of 24 months (average, 37 months). All were men with an average age of 22 years. According to Herbert's classification, all fractures were classified as of the acute unstable (B2). Fracture union was achieved in all cases at a mean of 9.2 weeks (eight to 12 weeks). Return to work or school ranged from one day to three weeks according to their occupation. This percutaneous fixation technique using Herbert screw is a reliable and effective alternative for acute scaphoid fractures, which enables the patient to use the hand earlier with high satisfaction and minimum complication.


1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. ESBERGER

It has been suggested that a positive scaphoid compression test will reliably confirm the presence of a fractured scaphoid in those patients presenting with an injury clinically suggestive of this, but without a fracture visible on initial X-rays. A prospective study was carried out in 99 patients presenting with an injury clinically suggestive of a scaphoid fracture. 74 patients had positive scaphoid compression tests with 24 of these patients having a scaphoid fracture visible on initial X-ray and seven having a fracture diagnosed either by repeat X-ray or bone scan 2 weeks after injury. 25 patients had a negative test, with ten having a scaphoid fracture visible on initial X-ray and three on repeat X-ray at 2 weeks. These results show that this test had a sensitivity of 70.5%, a specificity of 21.8% and predictive value of 41.9%. A positive scaphoid compression test is an unreliable diagnostic aid for a scaphoid fracture.


1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 750-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. WAIZENEGGER ◽  
M. L. WASTIE ◽  
N. J. BARTON ◽  
T. R. C. DAVIS

In a prospective study we performed bone scans on 84 patients who had sustained a wrist injury and in whom a scaphoid fracture was clinically suspected but could not be confirmed on the original set of five routine “scaphoid view” radiographs. In 40 patients the bone scan was normal and in 25 there was increased uptake in areas other than the scaphoid. In 19 there was localized increased uptake in the scaphoid bone. In seven of these a scaphoid fracture was subsequently demonstrated on repeat radiographs (five cases) or a CT scan (two cases). In the remaining 12 no fracture could be demonstrated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 990-994
Author(s):  
Dr. Sanjay Deo ◽  
Dr. Amol Patil ◽  
Dr. Avinash Kumar ◽  
Dr. Shubhanshu Gupta ◽  
Dr. Shreyas Kappalguddi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document