The Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Function

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P60-P60
Author(s):  
Thuy-Anh N. Melvin ◽  
Americo Migliaccio ◽  
John P Carey ◽  
Charles Coleman Della Santina
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Vestibular Hypofunction ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Objective 1) Measure vestibular function before and after cochlear implantation (CI) using a battery of tests covering the full range of stimulus frequencies over which the normal angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) stabilizes gaze. Methods Semicircular canal (SCC) function was assayed using head impulse test during 3-dimensional scleral search coil eye movement recordings (HIT), dynamic visual acuity during rapid head movements (DVA), head-shake nystagmus (HSN), and caloric electronystagmography (ENG). Saccular function was determined using vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Patient self-assessment via the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and clinical head impulse testing (cHIT) were also measured. Results One of 28 post-implanted ears (4%) suffered severe loss of vestibular function in all 3 SCCs. HSN revealed no change in 11 subjects. ENG revealed new hypofunction in 1 of 16 ears (6%). Passive DVA revealed no significant change for 16 implanted ears. VEMP revealed significant increase or disappearance in threshold in 5 of 16 ears (31%). DHI scores were variable and correlated poorly with objective tests. The cHIT performed by one otolaryngologist in 14 subjects exhibited 44% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detection of severe hypofunction confirmed via quantitative HIT. Conclusions CI carries a small but nontrivial risk of iatrogenic vestibular hypofunction in the implanted ear. For bilateral simultaneous-CI, the risk of bilateral vestibular hypofunction is ∼0.16%, comparable to the likelihood of meningitis. The cHIT was highly specific for vestibular hypofunction in this study, but likely depends heavily on the examiner's threshold for abnormal.

Video head impulse test saccades and loss of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are late vestibular footprints of cochlear implantation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Niels West ◽  
Mads Klokker ◽  
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vestibular Assessment

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation may be complicated by concurrent injury to the vestibular apparatus, potentially resulting in disabling vertigo and balance problems. Information on vestibular function before implantation as measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) is scarce and literature on long-term effects is non-existing. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate how vestibular function was affected by cochlear implantation (CI), as measured by VHIT and cVEMPs in the late phase after implantation. METHODS: Retrospective repeated measurement study. Patients: Among the 436 patients elected for CI surgery during 2013 to 2018, 45 patients met the inclusion criteria (CI recipients with a vestibular assessment prior to the first CI and a repeated vestibular assessment after the CI operation). Intervention: VHIT and cVEMPs before and after cochlear implantation. Main outcome measures were vestibular function as evaluated by VHIT gain, saccades and cVEMPs. RESULTS: The mean time between first and second vestibular screening was 19 months. The mean VHIT gain on implanted ears was 0.79 before the operation and showed no change at follow-up (p = 0.65). Likewise, the number of abnormal VHIT gain values was equal before and after the operation (p = 0.31). Preoperatively, saccades were present on 12 ears (14% ) compared with 25 ears (29% ) postoperatively (p = 0.013) and were associated with significantly lower VHIT gain values. Preoperatively, positive cVEMPs were found in 20 CI ears (49% ) and 24 contralateral ears (62% ). 10 CI ears lost cVEMP postoperatively compared with 2 ears on the contralateral side (p = 0.0047). CONCLUSIONS: Even though VHIT gain has been reported to be affected in the immediate post-implantation period, the findings in this study show that VHIT gain is normalized in the long-term. However, cochlear implantation is associated with the occurrence of VHIT saccades in the long-term and these are associated with lower VHIT gain values. In addition, cVEMP responses are significantly reduced long-term on implanted ears, which agrees with other studies with shorter follow-up.

Vestibular semicircular canal function as detected by video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) is essentially unchanged in people with Parkinson’s disease compared to healthy controls

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kim E. Hawkins ◽  
Elodie Chiarovano ◽  
Serene S. Paul ◽  
Ann M Burgess ◽  
Hamish G. MacDougall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Semicircular Canal ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common multi-system neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction, but prior vestibular function test findings are equivocal. OBJECTIVE: To report and compare vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain as measured by the video head impulse test (vHIT) in participants with PD, including tremor dominant and postural instability/gait dysfunction phenotypes, with healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Forty participants with PD and 40 age- and gender-matched HC had their vestibular function assessed. Lateral and vertical semicircular canal VOR gains were measured with vHIT. VOR canal gains between PD participants and HC were compared with independent samples t-tests. Two distinct PD phenotypes were compared to HC using Tukey’s ANOVA. The relationship of VOR gain with PD duration, phenotype, severity and age were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in vHIT VOR gain for lateral or vertical canals. There was no evidence of an effect of PD severity, phenotype or age on VOR gains in the PD group. CONCLUSION: The impulsive angular VOR pathways are not significantly affected by the pathophysiological changes associated with mild to moderate PD.

Vestibular function assessment of Susac syndrome patients by the video head impulse test and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 393-399
Author(s):  
Yahav Oron ◽  
Ophir Handzel ◽  
Zohar Habot-Wilner ◽  
Keren Regev ◽  
Arnon Karni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Susac Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cVEMPs and the vHIT. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients’ vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Viewing Target Distance Influences the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain when Assessed Using the Video Head Impulse Test

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Castro ◽  
Sara Sena Esteves ◽  
Florencia Lerchundi ◽  
David Buckwell ◽  
Michael A. Gresty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Reflex Gain

Gaze stabilization during head movements is provided by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Clinical assessment of this reflex is performed using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT). To date, the influence of different fixation distances on VOR gain using the vHIT has not been explored. We assessed the effect of target proximity on the horizontal VOR using the vHIT. Firstly, we assessed the VOR gain in 18 healthy subjects with 5 viewing target distances (150, 40, 30, 20, and 10 cm). The gain increased significantly as the viewing target distance decreased. A second experiment on 10 subjects was performed in darkness whilst the subjects were imagining targets at different distances. There were significant inverse relationships between gain and distance for both the real and the imaginary targets. There was a statistically significant difference between light and dark gains for the 20- and 40-cm distances, but not for the 150-cm distance. Theoretical VOR gains for different target distances were calculated and compared with those found in light and darkness. The increase in gain observed for near targets was lower than predicted by geometrical calculations, implying a physiological ceiling effect on the VOR. The VOR gain in the dark, as assessed with the vHIT, demonstrates an enhancement associated with a reduced target distance.

Video Head Impulse Testing (vHIT) and the Assessment of Horizontal Semicircular Canal Function

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (05) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristal M. Riska ◽  
Owen Murnane ◽  
Faith W. Akin ◽  
Courtney Hall
Keyword(s):  
Semicircular Canal ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
Horizontal Semicircular Canal ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
New Instrument ◽  
Qualitative Test

Background: Vestibular function (specifically, horizontal semicircular canal function) can be assessed across a broad frequency range using several different techniques. The head impulse test is a qualitative test of horizontal semicircular canal function that can be completed at bedside. Recently, a new instrument (video head impulse test [vHIT]) has been developed to provide an objective assessment to the clinical test. Questions persist regarding how this test may be used in the overall vestibular test battery. Purpose: The purpose of this case report is to describe vestibular test results (vHIT, rotational testing, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and balance and gait performance) in an individual with a 100% unilateral caloric weakness who was asymptomatic for dizziness, vertigo or imbalance. Data Collection and/or Analysis: Comprehensive assessment was completed to evaluate vestibular function. Caloric irrigations, rotary chair testing, vHIT, and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were completed. Results: A 100% left-sided unilateral caloric weakness was observed in an asymptomatic individual. vHIT produced normal gain with covert saccades. Conclusions: This case demonstrates the clinical usefulness of vHIT as a diagnostic tool and indicator of vestibular compensation and functional status.

scholarly journals The Effect of Different Head Movement Paradigms on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain and Saccadic Eye Responses in the Suppression Head Impulse Test in Healthy Adult Volunteers

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Starkov ◽  
Bernd Vermorken ◽  
T. S. Van Dooren ◽  
Lisa Van Stiphout ◽  
Miranda Janssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Healthy Adult ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Reflex Gain ◽  
Head Impulses ◽  
Adult Volunteers

Objective: This study aimed to identify differences in vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) and saccadic response in the suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) between predictable and less predictable head movements, in a group of healthy subjects. It was hypothesized that higher prediction could lead to a lower VOR gain, a shorter saccadic latency, and higher grouping of saccades.Methods: Sixty-two healthy subjects were tested using the video head impulse test and SHIMPs in four conditions: active and passive head movements for both inward and outward directions. VOR gain, latency of the first saccade, and the level of saccade grouping (PR-score) were compared among conditions. Inward and active head movements were considered to be more predictable than outward and passive head movements.Results: After validation, results of 57 tested subjects were analyzed. Mean VOR gain was significantly lower for inward passive compared with outward passive head impulses (p < 0.001), and it was higher for active compared with passive head impulses (both inward and outward) (p ≤ 0.024). Mean latency of the first saccade was significantly shorter for inward active compared with inward passive (p ≤ 0.001) and for inward passive compared with outward passive head impulses (p = 0.012). Mean PR-score was only significantly higher in active outward than in active inward head impulses (p = 0.004).Conclusion: For SHIMP, a higher predictability in head movements lowered gain only in passive impulses and shortened latencies of compensatory saccades overall. For active impulses, gain calculation was affected by short-latency compensatory saccades, hindering reliable comparison with gains of passive impulses. Predictability did not substantially influence grouping of compensatory saccades.

Vestibular function assessment of Susac syndrome patients by the video head impulse test and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yahav Oron ◽  
Ophir Handzel ◽  
Zohar Habot-Wilner ◽  
Keren Regev ◽  
Arnon Karni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Susac Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculopathy, SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. In contrast to data regarding auditory function, data measuring vestibular function is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the video head impulse test (vHIT) can serve as a confirmatory assessment of vestibulocochlear dysfunction in cases of suspected SuS. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with SuS underwent pure tone audiometry, a word recognition test, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs), and the v-HIT. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with definite SuS, and two with probable SuS. Two patients were asymptomatic for hearing loss or tinnitus, and no sensorineural hearing loss was detected by audiograms. Four patients complained of tinnitus, and three patients reported experiencing vertigo. Three patients had abnormal cVEMPs results. All seven patients’ vHIT results were normal, except for patient #2, who was one of the three who complained of vertigo. The calculated gain of her left anterior semicircular canal was 0.5, without saccades. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the results of the vHIT and cVEMPs among a group of patients with SuS. The results suggest that the vHIT should not be the only exam used to assess the function of the vestibular system of SuS patients.

Influence of vestibular rehabilitation on the recovery of all vestibular receptor organs in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-235
Author(s):  
Anamarija Sestak ◽  
Sinisa Maslovara ◽  
Zeljko Zubcic ◽  
Andrijana Vceva
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Rehabilitation ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Vestibular Hypofunction ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Vestibular Receptor

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies in the literature demonstrate the effect of vestibular rehabilitation (VR) on all vestibular receptor organs. Furthermore, very little evidence of the effect of VR on isolated otolith dysfunction (IOD) is available. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the effect of VR on all vestibular receptor organs in patients with different types of unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). METHODS: We enrolled 80 patients with three different types of UVH; combined and isolated loss of semicircular canal and otolith organ function. All patients performed a 12-week customized program of VR and received a full battery of vestibular function tests, before and after the VR. The DHI and SF-36 were performed before, after 6 weeks, and 12 weeks of the VR. RESULTS: Parameters of the caloric test, video head impulse test, ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were significantly improved after VR. A total of 59 (74%) patients fully recovered, with no significant difference in recovery regarding the type (p = 0.13) and stage of UVH (p = 0.13). All patients reported significantly lower disability and a better quality of life after the VR based on the DHI and SF-36 score. CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular rehabilitation has a positive effect on the recovery of all vestibular receptor organs and it should be used in patients with IOD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document