Stability of the SNIS epidemic spreading model with contagious incubation period over heterogeneous networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 526 ◽  
pp. 120878
Author(s):  
Yi Yu ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Ling Lin ◽  
Ping Hu ◽  
Xuming An
2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (11) ◽  
pp. 2308-2330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Hu ◽  
Lequan Min ◽  
Yang Kuang

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Andrey Viktorovich Podlazov

I propose two modifications of the SIR model of the epidemic spread, taking into account the social and space heterogeneity of the population. Social hetero¬geneity associated with differences in the intensity of paired contacts between people qualitatively changes the basic reproductive number. Space heterogeneity associated with differences in the intensity of multiple contacts between people significantly shifts the equilibrium position, increases the characteristic times and leads to the emergence of oscillatory dynamics of finite duration.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuzhen Zhu ◽  
Yuxin Liu ◽  
Xiaochen Wang ◽  
Yuexia Zhang ◽  
Shengzhi Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract In the pandemic of COVID-19, there are exposed individuals who are infected but lack distinct clinical symptoms. In addition, the diffusion of related information drives aware individuals to spontaneously seek resources for protection. The special spreading characteristic and coevolution of different processes may induce unexpected spreading phenomena. Thus we construct a three-layered network framework to explore how information-driven resource allocation affects SEIS (Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Susceptible) epidemic spreading. The analyses utilizing microscopic Markov chain approach reveal that the epidemic threshold depends on the topology structure of epidemic network, and the processes of information diffusion and resource allocation. Conducting extensive Monte Carlo simulations, we find some crucial phenomena in the coevolution of information diffusion, resource allocation and epidemic spreading. Firstly, when E-state (exposed state, without symptoms) individuals are infectious, long incubation period results in more E-state individuals than I-state (infected state, with obvious symptoms) individuals. Besides, when E-state individuals have strong or weak infectious capacity, increasing incubation period have an opposite effect on epidemic propagation. Secondly, the short incubation period induces the first-order phase transition. But enhancing the efficacy of resources would convert the phase transition to a second-order type. Finally, comparing the coevolution in networks with different topologies, we find setting the epidemic layer as scale-free network can inhibit the spreading of the epidemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document