scholarly journals A comparative analysis between two statistical deviation–based consensus measures in Group Decision Making problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 571-578
Author(s):  
M.J. del Moral ◽  
F. Chiclana ◽  
J.M. Tapia ◽  
C. Tapia–Garcia ◽  
E. Herrera–Viedma
Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong ◽  
Hou ◽  
Gong

To address issues involving inconsistencies, this paper proposes a stochastic multi-criteria group decision making algorithm based on neutrosophic soft sets, which includes a pair of asymmetric functions: Truth-membership and false-membership, and an indeterminacy-membership function. For integrating an inherent stochastic, the algorithm expresses the weights of decision makers and parameter subjective weights by neutrosophic numbers instead of determinate values. Additionally, the algorithm is guided by the prospect theory, which incorporates psychological expectations of decision makers into decision making. To construct the prospect decision matrix, this research establishes a conflict degree measure of neutrosophic numbers and improves it to accommodate the stochastic multi-criteria group decision making. Moreover, we introduce the weighted average aggregation rule and weighted geometric aggregation rule of neutrosophic soft sets. Later, this study presents an algorithm for neutrosophic soft sets in the stochastic multi-criteria group decision making based on the prospect theory. Finally, we perform an illustrative example and a comparative analysis to prove the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengxian Li ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Cun Wei ◽  
...  

Extended q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) is an excellent tool to depict the qualitative assessing information in multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) environments. The EDAS method is very effective especially when the conflicting attributes exist in the MAGDM issues in which the optimal alternative should have the biggest value of PDAS and the smallest value of NDAS. In this paper, we put forward the EDAS method for MAGDM issues under q-ROFSs, which makes use of average solution (AS) for assessing the chosen alternatives. The positive distance from AS (PDAS) and negative distance from AS (NDAS) is derived through the score of q-ROFSs. Then, the sorting order or the optimal alternative can be acquired by computing integrative appraisal score. Finally, a numerical example for buying a refrigerator is given to testify our developed EDAS method and some comparative analysis are also raised to further show the precious merits of this method.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arooj Adeel ◽  
Muhammad Akram ◽  
Ali N.A. Koam

In a few years, hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) have had an impact on several different areas of decision science. However, a number of researches have utilized the Elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE) methods to determine the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems with hesitant information. The aim of this research article is to develop new multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) methods, such as the m-polar hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE-I (mHF ELECTRE-I) method and hesitant m-polar fuzzy ELECTRE-I (HmF ELECTRE-I) method. Proposed MCGDM techniques based on the hybrid models, m-polar hesitant fuzzy sets (mHFS-sets) and hesitant m-polar fuzzy sets (HmF-sets), which are the natural generalizations of HFSs and m-polar fuzzy sets (mF sets). These models enable us to deal with multipolar information under hesitancy. We use the proposed methods to deal the complex problems in which the membership degree of an element of given set uses the m different numeric and fuzzy values, to rank all the alternatives and to determine the best alternative. We present two practical examples that illustrate the procedure of the proposed methods. We also discuss the differences and comparative analysis of the proposed methods. Finally, we develop an algorithm that implements our decision-making procedures by using computer programming.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document