Temsirolimus, the mTOR inhibitor, induces autophagy in adenoid cystic carcinoma: In vitro and in vivo

2014 ◽  
Vol 210 (11) ◽  
pp. 764-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlei Liu ◽  
Shengyun Huang ◽  
Zhanwei Chen ◽  
Huachun Wang ◽  
Haiwei Wu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Savarese ◽  
Andrea Abate ◽  
Ram Manohar Basnet ◽  
Luigi Lorini ◽  
Cristina Gurizzan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy characterized by high incidence of relapse. When relapsing, ACC has an indolent but relentless behaviour, thus leading to a poor long-term prognosis. The treatment of choice of relapsing ACC remains surgery followed by radiotherapy, whenever feasible. Therapeutic weapons are limited to systemic drugs. The most widely used chemotherapy regimen is the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin, however with low response rate and not long lasting; there is also a lack of alternatives for second line therapies in case of disease progression. Therefore, a more comprehensive strategy aimed at identifying at preclinical level the most promising drugs or combination is clearly needed. Methods In this study, the cytotoxic effects of two standard chemotherapy drugs, cisplatin and doxorubicin, and of five targeted therapy-drugs was tested in vitro, on an h-TERT immortalized ACC cell line. The same drugs were also tested in vivo, on zebrafish embryos with ACC tumoral cell xenograft. Then, combinations of one standard chemotherapy drug plus one targeted therapy drug were also evaluated, in order to find the best treatment strategy for ACC. Results Data obtained demonstrated that both vorinostat and olaparib significantly increased the standard chemotherapy cytotoxic effects, suggesting new interesting therapeutic options for ACC. Conclusion Data obtained in the present study provide valid new therapeutic strategies for ACC to be translated in a prospective clinical trial.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 706-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Shi ◽  
Jinying Zhang ◽  
Hongyu Liu ◽  
Liangliang Wu ◽  
Hongyu Jiang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
XINJIE YANG ◽  
PU ZHANG ◽  
QIN MA ◽  
LIANG KONG ◽  
YUAN LI ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Hayman ◽  
Amy Wahba ◽  
Barbara H. Rath ◽  
Heekyong Bae ◽  
Tamalee Kramp ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3017-3017
Author(s):  
Chiara Tarantelli ◽  
Eugenio Gaudio ◽  
Petra Hillmann ◽  
Filippo Spriano ◽  
Ivo Kwee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an important therapeutic target in lymphomas. PQR309 is a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor that has shown in vitroanti-lymphoma activity (Tarantelli et al, ASH2015) and is in phase 2 trial (NCT02249429, , NCT02723877, NCT02669511). PQR620 is a novel mTORC1/2 inhibitor that has shown preclinical activity in solid tumor models (Beaufils et al, AACR 2016). Here, we present the in vitro and in vivo anti-lymphoma activity of PQR620 as single agent and also the in vivo results of PQR620 or PQR309 containing combinations with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax. Materials and Methods. The drug concentration causing 50% inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50) was obtained in lymphoma cell lines [diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), no.=26; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), no.=8; anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma, no.=5; others, no=5] exposed to increasing doses of PQR620 for 72h using a Tecan D300e Digital Dispenser on 384well plates. For in vivo experiments, NOD-Scid (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J) mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 10 x106 (RIVA) or with 5 x106(SU-DHL-6) cells. Results. PQR620 had a median IC50 of 250 nM (95%CI, 200-269 nM) when tested on 44 lymphoma cell lines. Activity was higher in B cell (no.=36) than in T cell tumors (no.=8) (median IC50s: 250 nM vs 450 nM; P=0.002). At 72h, anti-tumor activityof PQR620 was mostly cytostatic and apoptosis induction was seen only in 6/44 cell lines (13%), Sensitivity to PQR620 or apoptosis induction did not differ between DLBCL and MCL, and they were not affected by the DLBCL cell of origin, by TP53 status or by the presence of MYC or BCL2 translocations. The activity of PQR620 as single agent underwent in vivo evaluation in two DLBCL models, the germinal center B cell type DLBCL (GCB-DLBCL) SU-DHL-6 and the acivated B cell-like DLBCL (ABC-DLBCL) RIVA. Treatments with PQR620 (100mg/kg dose per day, Qdx7/w) started with 100-150 mm3 tumors and were carried for 14 (SU-DHL-6) or 21 days (RIVA). In both models, PQR620 determined a 2-fold decrease of the tumor volumes in comparison with control, with significant differences in both SU-DHL-6 (D7, D9, D11, D14; P < 0.005) and RIVA (D14, D16, D19, D21; P < 0.005). Based on the previously reported synergy between the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 and venetoclax (Tarantelli et al, ASH 2015), we evaluated the combination of the PQR620 or PQR309 with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (100 mg/kg, Qdx7/w) in the SU-DHL-6 model. Both the venetoclax combination with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor and the venetoclax combination with mTORC1/2 inhibitor were superior to the compounds given as single agents, leading to the eradication of the xenografts. The combination of PQR620 with venetoclax showed highly significant differences either versus control or single agents during all days of the experiment (D4, D7, D9, D11, D14; P < 0.001). Similarly, the combination of PQR309 with venetoclax showed highly significant differences versus venetoclax (D7, D9, D11, D14; P < 0.001) and PQR309 (D7, D9, D11; P < 0.005) alone. Conclusions. The novel mTORC1/2 inhibitor PQR620 had in vitro and in vivo anti-lymphoma activity as single agent. In vivo experiments showed that both PQR620 and the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 can strongly benefit from the combination with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax. Disclosures Hillmann: PIQUR Therapeutics AG: Employment. Fabbro:PIQUR Therapeutics AG: Employment. Cmiljanovic:PIQUR Therapeutics AG: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 255-255
Author(s):  
N. Awasthi ◽  
P. L. Yen ◽  
M. A. Schwarz ◽  
R. Schwarz

255 Background: Gemcitabine (Gem, G) has limited benefits as single agent or in combination for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways are frequently dysregulated in diverse human cancers including PDAC. NVP-BEZ235 (BEZ, B) is a novel dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor that has been shown to have antitumor activity in multiple tumor types. Endothelial monocyte activating polypeptide II (EMAP, E) is an antiendothelial and antiangiogenic agent that enhances Gem and docetaxel activity in PDAC. We tested the combination benefits of BEZ and Gem in addition to EMAP in experimental PDAC. Methods: In vitro cell proliferation and protein expression were analyzed by WST-1 assay and Western blotting. In vivo animal survival experiments were performed in NOD-SCID PDAC xenografts. Results: Cultured cells of PDAC (AsPC-1), endothelial (HUVECs), and fibroblast origin (WI-38) all expressed AKT and mTOR protein. BEZ inhibited in vitro cell proliferation of AsPC-1 and HUVECs cells, with some additive effects in combination with Gem or EMAP, after 72 hours of incubation. In AsPC-1, treatment of BEZ (100 nM), Gem (100 nM) and EMAP (1 μM) caused 34, -7, -16, 62, 51, 3, and 59 percent inhibition in proliferation in the B, G, E, B+G, B+E, G+E and B+G+E groups. In HUVECs, percent inhibition in proliferation was 35, 33, 15, 55, 35, 31 and 53 in the B, G, E, B+G, B+E, G+E and B+G+E groups, respectively. Compared to controls (median survival: 16 days), an animal survival increase after BEZ and EMAP therapy alone (both 21 days) and Gem therapy alone (28 d) was observed. Further increases in survival occurred in combination therapy groups B+G (30 d, p=0.007), B+E (27 d, p=0.02), G+E (31 d, p=0.001) and B+G+E (33 d, p=0.004). Conclusions: Bez has experimental PDAC antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo that is further enhanced by combination of Gem and EMAP. These findings demonstrate advantages of combination therapy strategies targeting multiple pathways in pancreatic cancer treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document