Improvement in cognitive biases after group psychoeducation and metacognitive training in recent-onset psychosis: A randomized crossover clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 720-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribel Ahuir ◽  
Ángel Cabezas ◽  
Maria José Miñano ◽  
Maria José Algora ◽  
Francesc Estrada ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S303-S304
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel Ahuir Perez ◽  
Ángel Cabezas ◽  
Maria José Miñano ◽  
Maria José Algora ◽  
Francesc Estrada ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s242-s242
Author(s):  
M.L. Barrigon ◽  

AimTo assess the efficacy of Metacognitive Training (MCT) in symptoms and metacognitive variables in people with a recent onset of psychosis.MethodA multicenter, randomized and controlled clinical trial was performed. One hundred and twenty-six patients were randomized to MCT or a psycho-educational intervention. Patients with a recent onset of psychosis were recruited from 9 centers of Spain. The treatment consisted in 8 weekly sessions in both groups. Patients were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 6 months of follow-up. Symptoms were assessed by the PANSS. Metacognition was assessed by a battery of questionnaires of cognitive biases and social cognition: BCIS, IPSAQ, TCI, Hinting task and Emotional Recognition Test.ResultsPANSS positive symptoms significant declined between baseline and post-treatment in psycho-educational (P = 0.04) and MCT group (P = 0.01), while general PANSS and total PANSS were significant between baseline and post-treatment in the MCT group only (P = 0.008; P = 0.005). Across time, the MCT group was superior to psycho-educational on the BCIS total and self-certainty subscale (P = 0.042). Regarding irrational beliefs, the intolerance to frustration subscale declined more strongly in the MCT in relation to psycho-educational group (P = 0.016). ToM, Personalizing Bias and JTC improved more strongly in the MCT group compared to psycho-educational group (P < 0.001–0.032). Most results remained significant at the follow-up.ConclusionsMCT could be an effective psychological intervention for people with a recent onset of psychosis in order to improve symptoms, insight, tolerance to frustration and personalizing bias.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Schilling ◽  
Steffen Moritz ◽  
Ulf Köther ◽  
Matthias Nagel

Objective: The add-on intervention “metacognitive training for borderline patients (B-MCT)” targets cognitive biases in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). We aimed to evaluate acceptance, feasibility, and subjective use of this group intervention. Methods: Forty-eight inpatients with BPD were randomly assigned to 8 sessions of B-MCT versus an active control intervention (progressive muscle relaxation). Subjective use was assessed after 4 weeks. Results: B-MCT yielded significantly superior scores relative to the control group on several parameters, for example, use, fun, recommendation, and subjective improvements in symptomatology and cognitive abilities (e.g., perspective taking). Conclusions: The trial provides preliminary evidence for the acceptance and feasibility of metacognitive training in BPD. However, randomized controlled trials with larger samples and symptomatic outcomes are needed to investigate the specific impact of B-MCT on psychopathology and cognition.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 588-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. Bollyky ◽  
Ping Xu ◽  
Atul J. Butte ◽  
Darrell M. Wilson ◽  
Craig A. Beam ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. S23
Author(s):  
Amy Putnam ◽  
Michael Lee ◽  
Weihong Liu ◽  
Heather Escosa ◽  
Todd Brusko ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Kolbeck ◽  
Lisa Schilling

Abstract. Metacognitive Training for borderline personality disorder (B-MCT) is a low-threshold group intervention program, which targets borderline-specific cognitive biases and aims to ameliorate borderline symptomatology. The goal of the intervention is to help patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) identify and weaken (meta-)cognitive biases (e. g., monocausal reasoning, high-confident responses when interpreting facial expressions) that play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of BPD. Metacognitive training for BPD utilizes a “backdoor approach” by attenuating cognitive biases with entertaining and playful exercises. The training demonstrates patients that cognitive biases are normal to a certain extent, however, can lead to dysfunctional thinking patterns and compromise patient’s judgement when escalated. Preliminary findings confirm the feasibility, acceptance, and efficacy of B-MCT. This article describes the implementation of B-MCT in detail.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke C. Schneider ◽  
Lara Bücker ◽  
Sarah Riker ◽  
Evangelos Karamatskos ◽  
Lena Jelinek

Abstract. Depression remains one of the most common psychological disorders among older adults. Their response to antidepressants: however, is often unsatisfactory, and despite the proven efficacy of psychotherapies, a large treatment gap remains. Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold group intervention. This article examines the feasibility, acceptance, and effects of D-MCT as an add-on intervention among a group of older adults (55+ years; N = 116). Participants completed measures of depression and dysfunctional attitudes, and provided subjective appraisals of the training. Per protocol analyses (n = 55) revealed a significant decrease in depressive symptoms (d = 1.06) and cognitive biases (d = 0.33). The findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptance of D-MCT among older adults with depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document